Re: [Freesurfer] Data interest of the CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011

2017-06-29 Thread Corinna Bauer
Great, thank you! Best, Corinna On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Thomas Yeo wrote: > Hi Corinna, > > You can download here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/yj1gbpmpgho7wtm/Yeo_ > JNeurophysiol11_SplitLabels.zip?dl=0 > > Regards, > Thomas > > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Corinna Bauer > wrote

Re: [Freesurfer] Data interest of the CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011

2017-06-28 Thread Thomas Yeo
Hi Corinna, You can download here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/yj1gbpmpgho7wtm/Yeo_JNeurophysiol11_SplitLabels.zip?dl=0 Regards, Thomas On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Corinna Bauer wrote: > Dear Dr. Yeo, > > Our research group is currently trying to segment the Yeo atlas into > separate label

Re: [Freesurfer] Data interest of the CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011

2017-06-28 Thread Corinna Bauer
Dear Dr. Yeo, Our research group is currently trying to segment the Yeo atlas into separate labels, but just came across this thread which indicates that you have already done this. Would you be willing to re-share the link to your previously extracted individual labels from your 7 and 17 networks

Re: [Freesurfer] Data interest of the CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011

2015-05-18 Thread Thomas Yeo
Hi Annie, Can you share with us how you resolved the issue, so that other people who might search the email list for similar issues might benefit? Thanks, Thomas On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:39 PM, 陳昱潔 wrote: > Hi Dr. Yeo: > > Thank you very much we already solved the problem! > > Very appreciate

Re: [Freesurfer] Data interest of the CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011

2015-05-17 Thread Thomas Yeo
Hi Annie, I am a little unsure why this might happen. Did you inspect if $SUBJECTS_DIR/5204/label/lh.Yeo2011_17Networks_N1000.annot is correct? Cheers, Thomas On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:52 PM, 陳昱潔 wrote: > Hi Dr. Yeo : > > Thank you very much for helping us a lot! > I ran the command this below:

Re: [Freesurfer] Data interest of the CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011

2015-05-15 Thread Thomas Yeo
Hi Annie, Can you tell us the exact mri_surf2surf command you use? Cheers, Thomas On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 5:24 PM, 陳昱潔 wrote: > Hi Dr. Yeo, > > Thank you very much for your help! It is the exactly we need! > Only a little question that when we ran mris_surf2surf > Something seems wrong , but I

Re: [Freesurfer] Data interest of the CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011

2015-05-14 Thread Thomas Yeo
Hi Annie, I have previously extracted individual regions from the 7 and 17 networks. You can download them here (https://www.dropbox.com/s/u23nn3ov18tlhfs/Yeo_JNeurophysiol11_SplitLabels.zip?dl=0). Please see the README in the folder for more explanations. There should be a precuneus DMN region.

Re: [Freesurfer] Data interest of the CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011

2015-05-12 Thread Thomas Yeo
Hi Annie, I assume this means 5202 is your subject ID? Maybe you should check if /home/annie/test_run_allindex/5202/label/lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot exist? If so, you can run mris_anatomical_stats to generate statistics for the parcellation. Cheers, Thomas On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:29 PM,

Re: [Freesurfer] Data interest of the CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011

2015-05-12 Thread Thomas Yeo
Hi Annie, mri_surf2surf is complaining that it cannot write out the annotation. Just to clarify, is your subject called test_run_allindex? In other words, is the variable s equal to test_run_allindex? Does the directory "/home/annie/test_run_allindex/label/" exist? If not, then you first need to

Re: [Freesurfer] Data interest of the CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011

2015-05-05 Thread Thomas Yeo
Hi Annie, Please cc the freesurfer list when you reply because there might be other people more qualified to answer your question. Based on what you are saying, I think you can first use mri_surf2surf (with the "sval-annot" flag) to transform the 2011 functional networks .annot file from fsaverag

Re: [Freesurfer] Data interest of the CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011

2015-05-01 Thread Thomas Yeo
Hi Yu-Chieh, I am cc-ing the freesurfer list who may help you with your issues. Can you explain what exactly you are trying do? The parcellation is released in different resolutions including fsaverage5. Why can't you just use the fsaverage5 parcellation? Cheers, Thomas On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6