Hi Kasper,
because that is the way it is designed. Whenever recon-all runs on
longitudinal data, it needs to know where the cross and base are (just
in case that this info is needed somewhere). So the correct call is the
one with the -long telling it that this is a longituidnal run (and not
j
Hi Martin,
When doing cross-sectional analysis on a longitudinal data set and the qdec
table is ordered as followed:
fsid Gender Group Age
d115a.long.d115_base 1 1 19
d120a.long.d120_base 0 1 22
Why does the presmoothing not have to be:
recon-all -s d115a.long.d115_base -qcache
recon-all -s d120a
Hi Kasper,
That needs to be the cross-sectinal name (whenever you also pass a base,
it will automatically create the ..long.. names internally).
cheers, Martin
On 03/11/2016 08:51 AM, Kasper Jessen wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the answer :-)
To presmooth the data onto target, with the fol
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the answer :-)
To presmooth the data onto target, with the following command:
recon-all -long -qcache
The , does that have to be the longitudinal name (d115a.long.d115_base)
or the cross-sectional name (d115a)?
Best wishes
Kasper
2016-03-09 22:38 GMT+01:00 Martin Reute
Hi Kasper,
short answer: yes.
long answer
1. yes
2. yes (you need to create a table in cross sectional format (no
fsid-base column) and the fsid needs to be the tp.long.base names for
baseline visit. the path should point to where these *.long.*
directories are located).
2. yes (fsaverage sh
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
We have a longitudinal study design with up to 5 time points. However, we
both want to do a baseline cross-sectional analysis and later a
longitudinal analysis. All subjects have been run through the longitudinal
pipeline (only the base was edited). We want to start analys
