aggressive, although it can be turned down if your sequence doesn’t
have enough CNR in some regions
Cheers
Bruce
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
On Behalf Of AmirHussein Abdolalizadeh
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2023 7:25 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: [Freesurfer] Basal
I definitely meant to type *Dear in my email.
Cheers,
Maryam
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Syeda Wajiha Maryam
wrote:
> Fear Freesurfer Experts,
>
> I have a feeling this question has been asked already but I'm still
> confused about it. Is there a way to extract the basal ganglia structure
sure, we segment putamen, pallidum and caudate as part of the aseg.mgz
(and nucleus accumbens, although that is less well-defined)
On Thu, 11 Feb
2016, Syeda Wajiha Maryam wrote:
> Fear Freesurfer Experts,
>
> I have a feeling this question has been asked already but I'm still confused
> about
Fear Freesurfer Experts,
I have a feeling this question has been asked already but I'm still
confused about it. Is there a way to extract the basal ganglia structure
using freesurfer?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Regards,
Maryam
___
Freesurfer mail
Hi John
what parts of the basal ganglia do you want? We label
caudate/putamen/pallidum/accumbens separately. You can combine them all
together and get one ROI if you want. They should all be in the wmparc.mgz
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, John Anderson
wrote:
Hi Experts,
I want to do
Hi Experts,
I want to do tractography for the cortico spinal tract between two ROIs ( ROI1: precentral gyrus; ROI2: basal ganglia). I created the first ROI using mask form wmparc.mgz. How can I create mask for the basal ganglia ( there is no label for it). Do I need to segmenta the basal ganglia s
Hi Dhinakaran,
4 and 5 aren't part of our current automated segmentation. Sorry, I'm not
sure how visible they are in a 1mm T1-weighted image
Bruce
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010,
Dhinakaran Chinappen wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Hope your research is going smoothly.
>
> My question refers to the basal ganglai
Dear all,
Hope your research is going smoothly.
My question refers to the basal ganglai components. I previously shot an
email which Prof. Fischl was kind enough to reply to: the basal ganglia is
not computed as a structure of its own in FreeSurfer.
These are the structures of the basal ganglia
Hi Dhinakaran,
we compute the volumes of structures within the basal ganglia (e.g.
caudate, putamen, pallidum), which you can just add up, or analyze
separately
cheers,
Bruce
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Dhinakaran Chinappen wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I was wondering if there is a direct measurement to ge
Dear all,
I was wondering if there is a direct measurement to get the basal ganglia
volume? I looked into the stats files but could get my hands on it. Is there
a particular calculation to carry out?
Thanks in advance,
Dhinakaran Chinappen.
___
Freesurf
Hi Paul,
yes, we know this happens - it's because of the way the manual training
set was constructed, so that it has voxels labeled cortex there that
shouldn't exist. The accumbens in general isn't all that accurate as it has
no real intensity signatures at its boundaries, so we don't use it a
p.s. sorry, I should have looked at the images first. Everything I said
still applies, but this looks worse than it should. If you put it one our
filedrop I'll take a look
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Paul Greenberg wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble getting an accurate subcortical segmentation (aseg.m
12 matches
Mail list logo