Hi Dorian
if you want to avoid overlap you might need to cobble together a procedure
yourself - probably converting the annots to labels then removing the
overlap and recombining into an annot. It wouldn't be that hard to do in
matlab.
For you second question you are probably best off drawin
On 06/23/2014 01:35 PM, Dorian P. wrote:
> Thank you Bruce and Douglas,
>
> I meant to combine them because I did not want overlaps.
I don't think we have any tools to mix and match them.
>
> Can I advance one more question as we are here. How can I get an
> average thickness of the entire latera
Thank you Bruce and Douglas,
I meant to combine them because I did not want overlaps.
Can I advance one more question as we are here. How can I get an average
thickness of the entire lateral temporal lobe (inferior, medial, temporal
gyri)? The average of the three gyri may not be useful as one gy
>>For Destrieux there is only the aparc.a2009s+aseg.mgz. Does this file
have also the WM parcellation?
Not by default, bu you can create one easily enough with
cd $SUBJECTS_DIR/subject
mri_aparc2aseg --s subject --labelwm --hypo-as-wm --rip-unknown
--volmask --o mri/wmparc.a2009s.mgz --a2009
Hi Dorian
you don't need to combine them in any specific way if all you want is to
look at ROI-based stats. Just take the ones from each atlas that you
like.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Dorian P. wrote:
Dear Freesurfer followers/developers,
I am doing a study involving temporal lobes
Dear Freesurfer followers/developers,
I am doing a study involving temporal lobes and the parcellations from
Desikan and Destrieux atlases have very different results. I like the full
gyrus parcellation of Desikan but the temporal pole is very small and
limited, while in Destriux the temporal pole
