External Email - Use Caution
Hi, Doug.
I manually checked for the sig values, and all I got were positive. Is this
unexpected?
Should I write someone to get those binaries? I tried to run it again, and was
not successful.
Many many thanks!
--
Pedro
> On May 29, 2018, at 12:29
Many thanks!
Pedro Rosa.
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 13:48, Iglesias, Eugenio wrote:
>
> You can! It just makes your results harder to reproduce (running recon-all
> with one version, and the subfields with the other).
>
> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
> Translational Imaging Group
> University College Lo
Hi, Doug.
Is it possible to run FreeSurfer 6 Hippocampal-subfields on FreeSurfer 5.3
recons, or this also should not be done?
Best,
Pedro Rosa.
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 11:58, Douglas Greve wrote:
>
>
> PLEASE DO NOT USE ANYTHING LABELLED AS "6.0" FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN
> TESTING. WHEN WE RELEA
Thanks again!
Pedro Rosa.
> On Apr 14, 2016, at 19:25, Douglas N Greve wrote:
>
> yes, assuming you ran mri_glmfit with that label as a mask
>
>> On 04/14/2016 06:06 PM, Pedro Rosa wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Many many thanks. It worked:
>>
>> mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir teste2 --cache-dir
>> /$FREESURFER_
Many thanks!
> On Mar 16, 2016, at 15:18, Marie Schaer wrote:
>
>
> You still have to “smooth” even if you choose fwhm=0 to project the data in
> the fsaverage space.
>
> So if I were you I would start with fwhm=5mm, check in the qdec console what
> is the final fwhm of your data (or check
