gt; though - I am more concerned about your subject with only 53 vertices in
> it. You can visualize it by loading the ?h.cortex.label onto the inflated
> surface. Everything not in the label should be set to 0
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Taha Abdullah
The entire medial wall has thickness values of 0 because there is no
> cortex there. There needs to be a surface in that area because we need a
> closed surface.
>
> On 10/12/16 8:10 PM, Taha Abdullah wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> Quick question, I ran recon-all with the qcache op
9,000
vertices. Is there a method I can use to have a thickness value for each of
the 163000+ vertices? I am not sure if this is a possible registration
issue to mni305.
Thanks in advance,
Taha
--
*Taha Abdullah*
*Department of Physiology,*
*Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
surface, and also to get
> thickness statistics (thickness is just the distance between corresponding
> points on the white and pial surface). You don't need to do anything to map
> from white to inflated within an individual.
>
> Best,
> a.y
>
>
> On Fri, 19 Aug 201
wrote:
>
> Hi Taha - Trying getting a .dat registration file from bbregister and
> using that as the input to mri_vol2surf. There's a multimodal tutorial on
> the freesurfer wiki that might be of help.
>
> Best,
> a.y
>
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Taha Abdullah wrot
all zeros. I am not entirely sure what I am doing wrong
here, it is probably somewhere in the last two commands. Possibly using
mri_segstats or mri_read.m? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Apologize in advance for the long email.
--
Taha Abdullah
Department of Physiology
Northwestern
ach vertex? We don't have
> anything to do that, but you can do it in matlab, eg,
> M = fast_vol2mat(MRIread('lh.yourdata.mgh'));
> M will be a 240x127000 matrix
>
>
> On 5/4/16 8:36 PM, Taha Abdullah wrote:
>
> Hello Doug,
>
> Sorry for the confusing a
gt; that for you. Flattening is irrelevant for this as it only changes the
> xyz coordinate of the vertex and not the vertex identity.
> doug
>
>
> On 04/29/2016 11:24 AM, Taha Abdullah wrote:
> > Hello Freesurfer Experts,
> >
> > Long story short--I would like to ex
t the aseg). You can run the individual
>> steps through the end of mri_ca_label if you want to stop there
>>
>> cheers
>> Bruce
>>
>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Taha Abdullah wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
e the surfaces give better
> estimates of cortex and such (and we use them to automatically correct the
> aseg). You can run the individual steps through the end of mri_ca_label if
> you want to stop there
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Taha Abdullah wrote:
&
such file or
dir, specifically the /surf/lh.white.
Is there a better way to run this type of analysis to save disk space and
time? Possibly using -autorecon2'; would love any input. Thank you in
advance!
--
Taha Abdullah
Department of Physiology
Northwestern University
Masters of Sc
ion
or advice would be great! I put the commands just to give an idea of my
workflow (most of the command lines are from the email server or the FS
Wiki) and if there are any issues with my steps please let me know so I can
correct them before starting the group analysis.
Best,
Taha
--
Taha Ab
12 matches
Mail list logo