oduced in
> case you want to visualize something on an average brain, but all the
> pointwise and average FA/MD/etc values are extracted in the native DWI
> space of each subject.
>
> Best,
> a.y
>
> On Sun, 5 Jul 2015, Pedro Rosa - GMail wrote:
>
> &g
Dear Developers,
Tracula’s Statistics wiki suggests one to use the statistical software of
choice. Could it be glmfit?
For that, I think I would need to concatenate each tract-by-voxel diffusion
data from each subject (e.g., each diffusion data of course separately) in
common space (e.g., MNI)
Thanks, Doug!
Pedro Rosa
On Monday, May 11, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
> It sounds like you did the right thing.
>
> On 05/10/2015 02:41 PM, Pedro Rosa - GMail wrote:
> > Dear developers,
> > I am running an analysis with dt_recon, and it seems that
Dear developers,
I am running an analysis with dt_recon, and it seems that my DWI files are
organized into three series (one larger, and two smaller, that I believe are
ADC and Trace). Inputing a DICOM file to dt_recon generates a .nii file from
one of the series only (the larger one, once it h
veira Junior
> Netfilter & SpeedComm Telecom
> -- www.netfilter.com.br (http://www.netfilter.com.br)
> -- For mobile: http://itunes.apple.com/br/artist/netfilter/id365306441
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Pedro Rosa - GMail (mailto:pedrogomesr...@gmail.com)> wrot
Dear FreeSurfer users,
Has anyone succeeded in running FreeSurfer 5.3 in a cloud processing system,
such as Amazon EC2?
I have seen prior posts in regard of FreeSurfer 5.1
(https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2011-November/021181.html),
but not for 5.3.
Regards,
Pedro Rosa.
__
; Bruce
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2015, Pedro Rosa - Gmail
> wrote:
>
> > Dear FreeSurfers,
> > I was correcting the topology of some subjects, and could not fix some
> > subjects whose insula is misplaced into the temporal lobe / subcortical
> > regions. Inspecting wm.mg
Dear FreeSurfers,
I was correcting the topology of some subjects, and could not fix some subjects
whose insula is misplaced into the temporal lobe / subcortical regions.
Inspecting wm.mgz in tkmedit, it seems that there are wm voxels into the
hippocampus, perhaps leading surfaces to be built th
t; > >voxel sizes: 1.0938, 1.0938, 1.5000
> > >
> > > This can induce a bias. You need to keep imaging parameters fixed in a
> > > longitudinal study, else you'll not know if changes are anatomical
> > > changes or induced by the different
Dear FreeSurfers,
I have read in the Mailing list
(http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg32753.html and
others) other users asking questioning in regard of a Warning from FreeSurfer
5.3 longitudinal pipeline (-base step):
\n**
> ?dl=0
> > Thanks a lot,
> > Pedro.
> >
> > On Mar 5, 2015, at 23:32, Bruce Fischl
> > mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu)> wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm, if you upload it we will take a look
> > Bruce
> >
> >
> >
> > On M
etc...?
>
>
>
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 9:08 PM, Pedro Rosa - Gmail (mailto:pedrogomesr...@gmail.com)> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Bruce.
> > Yes, it it the T1.mgz. Is it a large topological error? Can I correct it
> > editing wm.mgz?
> > Thanks,
> > Pedro.
> >
gt;
>
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 8:28 PM, Pedro Rosa - Gmail (mailto:pedrogomesr...@gmail.com)> wrote:
>
> > Dear FreeSurfer,
> > I have found several subjects to have temporal lobe misegmentations
> > (usually neocortical, as attached, but sometimes mesial temppora
Dear FreeSurfer,
I have found several subjects to have temporal lobe misegmentations (usually
neocortical, as attached, but sometimes mesial tempporal), and less frequently
in the insula.
I could find in the manual editing page from the Wiki a way to fix this. How
should I do it?
Thanks a lot,
Dear all,
I would like to know whether a RAM memory replacement in a Mac computer would
change FreeSurfer 5.3 processing.
I have a sample that was almost completely processed, but there are a few
subjects whose acquisition are yet to be done. I would like know whether I
could process such images
intensity parameters are reasonable? Things like max gray
> at csf border and such. If not, you can set them explicitly using the
> expert opts - this usually works
> Bruce
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Pedro Rosa - Gmail
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I am resending
Dear Freesurfer List,
Reading the Wiki for the GLM procedures, I understood that that covariates that
are “0” in the contrast matrix are “regressed out”
(http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Fsgdf2G2V).
I would like to know if this is also true for the LME contrasts
(http://surfer.nmr.mg
17 matches
Mail list logo
