ough they would be generated in the same way across subjects with
> either method
>
>
>
> *From:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <
> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> *On Behalf Of *Leonardo Cardoso
> Saraiva
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 10, 2023 4:07 P
> more accurate than the ones mapped from fsaverage. Probably not enough to
> make a significant difference though
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
> *From:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <
> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> *On Behalf Of *Leonardo Cardoso
> Sa
ternal Email - Use Caution*
>
> Which annot files are you comparing? Some of them (eg, aparc) have an
> extra procedure where the labels boundaries are fine-tuned, so that could
> cause the difference. Your command looks right.
>
> On 8/30/2023 1:28 PM, Leonardo Cardoso Sara
, Leonardo Cardoso Saraiva <
leonardo.sara...@usp.br> escreveu:
> Dear Freesurfer Experts,
>
> I am using .annot files to extract parcellated vertex-wise morphometric
> features from surf files (e.g., area value from ?h.area file). For each
> vertex, I want to determine the par
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Freesurfer Experts,
I am using .annot files to extract parcellated vertex-wise morphometric
features from surf files (e.g., area value from ?h.area file). For each
vertex, I want to determine the parcel it belongs to and its associated
morphometri
