External Email - Use Caution
Mean correlation values to the seed from activations of a pcc.mgh map from
each individual subject.
On Thursday, October 31, 2019, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <
dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
> mean over what? a parcellation? an activation cluster?
>
> On
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Andrew,
I am very sorry for the delay of my answer.
Everything works with the patch.
Thank you so much!
Cheers,
Maxime
On Oct 10, 2019, at 11:39 AM, Hoopes, Andrew wrote:
Hi Maxine,
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Kersten,
Thanks you so much for your reply and sorry I missed your earlier message. I'll
implement the suggestions you've suggested. Thanks again.
Kind regards,
Bronwyn Overs
Research Assistant
Neuroscience Research Australia
Mar
mean over what? a parcellation? an activation cluster?
On 10/31/2019 3:15 PM, Amrita Bedi wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Thank you Dr Greve, that issue is resolved.
I do have another question. I’m now trying to extract mean correlation values
to the seed from each individual subje
External Email - Use Caution
Thank you Dr Greve, that issue is resolved.
I do have another question. I’m now trying to extract mean correlation
values to the seed from each individual subject and not sure how to go
about this.
On Thursday, October 31, 2019, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D
You have to specify that this is a DOSS analysis with
--fsgd CMTX_b.fsgd doss
On 10/31/19 12:38 PM, Georgina Angelopoulou wrote:
>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Dear Douglas,
>
> Thank you once again for your reply and your help.
>
> Attached please find the fsgd file (CMTX_b.fsgd)
You can run mri_surfcluster with your fdr threshold as the --thmin
value. This will output cluster number (ocn) map. This will assign the
cluster number to a vertex. You can then use mri_segstats with --seg
ocn.mgz --excludeid 0 and input being the mean thickness or area maps.
When you use area
The MGX method is only valid in voxels that have some gray matter in
them (defined as 1% in the command line below), so any WM is set to 0
(probably accounts for the big hole that you see). The mgx output is
divided into cortical GM and subcortical GM, so you are probably looking
at the cortica
There are not any restrictions, just do the same as you would for a
non-paired analysis. In any event, you are creating a linear model
y = a +b1*x1 + b2*x2 ...
where y is the input (paired diff) and x1, x2, etc, are your factors.
You are the one who knows your data and what models would be approp
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Greve,
Thank you for your quick respons.
Yes, I believe that is what I mean. Let me illustrate with some (fictive) data;
We were able to prove these data for the entire hemisphere as can be seen below.
Group 1
Group 2
Difference
Sig.
Th
External Email - Use Caution
Hello,
Wondering if anyone has had issues with PETsurfer partial volume correction.
When I have used it, there are large 'holes' in the white matter. I am mostly
interested in the hippocampal area, which seems unaffected by these holes, but
I'm not
External Email - Use Caution
My doubt is, if it is possible to use a FSGD file to add variables to a
--paired-diff analysis. If it is, what would be the right way to format the
FSGD file.
Thanks in advance.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 3:01 PM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <
dgr...@mgh.harv
External Email - Use CautionDear Douglas,
age_sim.mtx
Description: Binary data
CMTX_b.fsgd
Description: Binary data
Thank you once again for your reply and your help.Attached please find the fsgd file (CMTX_b.fsgd) including age row scores and the contrast file. The command line
You are not creating the 4D_VOLUME_OUTPUT.lh.nii.gz file correctly
Try
mri_concat --o 4D_VOLUME_OUTPUT.lh.nii.gz --i
*/Bold/PCC_Bold1_L/bilat*/pcc.nii.gz
Where you have "bilat*", that should only be one folder
On 10/31/19 12:04 PM, Amrita Bedi wrote:
>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
External Email - Use Caution
-- Forwarded message --
From: *abedi...@citymail.cuny.edu * <
abedi...@citymail.cuny.edu>
Date: Thursday, October 31, 2019
Subject: Fw: glm error
To: Amrita Bedi
Amrita Bedi
*Biomedical Engineering - Class of 2018*
*The City College
I'm not sure what you mean. Do you want the mean thickness of a cluster
and/or its surface area?
On 10/30/19 6:02 PM, Aicha Dijkshoorn wrote:
>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Dear developers,
>
> For a case-control study we are comparing the cortical thickness and
> cortical surface
16 matches
Mail list logo