When I ran the following command (with our data), I got the average beta values
for each segmentation i.e. only 5 beta values (as opposed to 5 beta values for
each subject).
mri_segstats --seg ocn.mgh --i beta.mgh --excludeid 0 --avgwf
beta.clusters.dat
That said, is it necessarily to run the
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Doug,
Sorry to bother, maybe my last message got lost.
Do you think you can advice me on this type of registration? Thanks!
Best
Francesca
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019, 11:44 PM Francesca Strappini <
francescastrapp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What is the bes
When I ran the following command (with our data), I got the average beta values
for each segmentation i.e. only 5 beta values (as opposed to 5 beta values for
each subject).
mri_segstats --seg ocn.mgh --i beta.mgh --excludeid 0 --avgwf
beta.clusters.dat
That said, is it necessarily to run the
Hi Michael
you can use either --projfrac-avg or --projdist-avg (dist I guess if you
want to specify 10mm). Note that this is an average along 1D (the surface
normal direction), not in a volume window
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Michael
Jordan wrote:
External Email - Use Ca
External Email - Use Caution
Sorry, I just found in a previous post by doug that ADC is the same as MD?
*Daniel Callow*
*PhD Student, Neuroscience and Cognitive Science*
Exercise for Brain Health Lab
University of Maryland, College Park
*ddcc2...@gmail.com *
443-254-6298
__
External Email - Use Caution
Hello,
There is no mean diffusivity output with dt_recon. How would you suggest to
create MD images? Could you simply divide the adc.nii.gz map by 3?
Best,
*Daniel Callow*
*PhD Student, Neuroscience and Cognitive Science*
Exercise for Brain Health Lab
External Email - Use Caution
Hello,
I am still having the same issue as in my previous post. I have
successfully run dt_recon and upon looking at the images there seems to be
no issue with the registrations of outputs including the FA, lowb and other
images.
I wanted to mask my F
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Bruce,
thank you it worked!
Another short question:
I want mri_surf2vol to assign the average of all volume voxel values within
10 mm to the corresponding vertices.
So if there is only one voxel value greater than zero in the volume, all
vertices
the cortex.label is built based on a bunch of rules (e.g. surface
locations next to the CC are not cortex), and so varies across subject
depending on structure size and geometry
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, 310913949
wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Freesurfer P
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Freesurfer Pros??
I want to know how the label file is generated?Is it the *h.cortex.label
generated after mapping the vertices into the space of the fsaverage? If yes,
why different subjects dont have the same vertices number of the
lh.corte
10 matches
Mail list logo