Hi Emma,
I might not be the only one who is unsure what you mean by a vertex-wise
cortical surface area measure. Do you mean something like what is illustrated
in figures 2 and 3 here:
http://www.pnas.org/content/107/29/13135.figures-only
… which is similar, but not identical to the local gyr
Dear Freesurfers,
I recently heard that there are several disadvantages to using a measure of
cortical surface area in Freesurfer, specifically due to conducting a
vertex-wise analysis. Can someone help me understand why a measure of
surface area using this approach might be flawed? Thanks!
___
I don't really know, sorry. You could to an inter- and intra-rater test
by editing some of the images twice
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Sneha Pandya wrote:
> Thanks again, yes that's what it looks like, but I just have one concern, if
> I have to manually edit dura and wm in all the slices and in most
Thanks again, yes that's what it looks like, but I just have one concern, if I
have to manually edit dura and wm in all the slices and in most of the
subjects, will it still give me reliable cortical thickness measure?
Thanks,
Sneha
From: freesurfer-boun.
Hi Sneha
then I think manually editing is your best bet (sorry)
Bruce
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Sneha Pandya wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Yes, there is a lot of dura. Unfortunately we do not have either flair or
> T2 as a reference to remove dura. I tried running gcut to cut off dura,
> it still won't h
Hi Bruce,
Yes, there is a lot of dura. Unfortunately we do not have either flair or T2 as
a reference to remove dura. I tried running gcut to cut off dura, it still
won't help and I still had to manually edit whole volume to get rid of it. If
it helps I can send you orig.mgz, nu.mgz and brainma
Hi Sneha
it looks like it is grabbing a bunch of dura. Do you happen to have a
hires T2 or flair image? If so, you can use that in recon-all
postprocessing to remove the dura. If not you can try using the graph
cuts skull stripping to get rid of some of it. I can't tell the accuracy
of the sur
glad to hear it
Bruce
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Smith, Michael wrote:
We re-ran that subject and it seemed to fix the problem, thanks! We will test
it out on the other subjects with the same issue and see how that goes, but it
looks like everything is good. Thanks again!
-Original Message
We re-ran that subject and it seemed to fix the problem, thanks! We will test
it out on the other subjects with the same issue and see how that goes, but it
looks like everything is good. Thanks again!
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-b
No, use fmc.sm2.F99.lh.iter05
On 10/10/14 1:55 AM, Reza Rajimehr wrote:
> Thanks Doug! I got it to work. The outputs are like
> fmc.sm2.F99.lh.iter05.nii.gz
>
> Should I still specify stem as fmc.iter05 in mkanalysis-sess?
>
> Reza
>
>
> Try added something like "-expkey iter05". When you make th
Hi,I would like to exclude areas which were incorrectly segmented and could not be corrected after editing and re-running recon-all from the cortical thickness measure. Thank you again.Best,ruthiOn 09 Oct 2014, at 19:57, Douglas Greve wrote:
What analys
11 matches
Mail list logo