Dear list,
I ran the recon-all and the Freesurfer 5.1 longitudinal pipeline in a
structural MRI dataset and I would like to use Monte Carlo as the method for
correction for multiple comparisons. However, the longitudinal LME tutorial
includes only FDR correction (lme_mass_FDR2).
Is it possible
Hi Kim
we of course always strive to make things more accurate, but in the end
it will depend on the details of your acquisition and such. I don't think
I have a better answer than that, other than to say look at the
segmentations and see if you think they are more accurate in one case
than th
Dear Prof. Fischl
Thanks for the prompt response.
The more specific reason of my query is that there was a difference in
statistical significance between two FS versions.
For example, the result of group comparison of left thalamic volumes
(ANCOVA controlling for age and eICV) is statistically si
Hi Kim
there are probably lots of little reasons for the differences. This is
always true for different versions, and the reason we never mix versions
cheers
Bruce
On
Sun, 23 Mar 2014, jh kim wrote:
> Dear FS lists
> When I measured subcortical GM volumes in the same subjects by using both
> v
Dear FS lists
When I measured subcortical GM volumes in the same subjects by using both
version 5.1 and 5.3, I have observed a considerable difference in volumes
between the two versions.
For instance, please see the left thalamic volumes below.
I cannot figure out why there is much difference bet
Hello Stacey,
this issue came up recently, please find attached some responses. I hope
this helps.
Cheers,
Jorge
On 21/03/2014 21:56, Stacey M Schaefer wrote:
Hello freesurfer gurus,
We acquire 2 BRAVO T1s on a GE 3T during the same scan session on most of our
study participants, but be
