Sure, glad it worked out. I like the easy solutions :)
> On Dec 13, 2013, at 10:21 PM, Ryan Mruczek wrote:
>
> Yes, and they indeed do not match up on the two machines. I transferred
> twice, not sure why there would be this issue with just the lh files. I
> changed ftp programs and that see
Yes, and they indeed do not match up on the two machines. I transferred twice,
not sure why there would be this issue with just the lh files. I changed ftp
programs and that seems to work. Thanks for pointing me toward in the (now)
obvious route of doing the checksums.
Cheers,
Ryan
On Dec 1
Hi Bruce,
I upload the sugject "lilei" to your e-mail which is the segmentation
incorrectly in -surfs.
Thanks for your helping check it.
All the best.
2013-12-14
Rujing Zha
发件人:Bruce Fischl
发送时间:2013-12-14 05:27
主题:Re: [Freesurfer] segmentation incorrectly after recon-all
收件人:"Rujing Zha"
Thank you Bruce,
I read that mris_sample_parc "samples a volumetric parcellation onto a
surface".
I understand that this is like creating from a file of the type of aseg a
corresponding file of the type of aparc.annot.ctab.
Is this not true? Do I actually have to create the aparc.annot.ctab typ
Hi Markus
you need to create that file (or update FreeSurferColorLUT.txt) to reflect
whatever you have in /Documents/myROIfile.mgz
cheers
Bruce
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Markus Gschwind wrote:
Dear Bruce,
Thank you for your answer. I have not yet gotten it correctly.
1) Where does that file com
Dear Bruce,
Thank you for your answer. I have not yet gotten it correctly.
1) Where does that file come from? Should I create it? how?
2) what is missing in the command of mris_sample_parc? Why does it now
work?
3) what does the second error mean?
CTABfindAnnotation: ct was NULL
No such file or
can you checksum the files on both machines?
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Ryan Mruczek wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I created surfaces for a particular subject on one machine, and subsequently
> copied the entire subjects surface directory to another machine (both running
> OSX, although different versions). O
Hi Markus
that file translates indices/annotations into colors to display and human
reasable names.
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Markus Gschwind wrote:
I can precise the question, actually there are three:
1) ist the command correct?
mris_sample_parc -v -sdir subject001 rh
Hi All
I created surfaces for a particular subject on one machine, and subsequently
copied the entire subjects surface directory to another machine (both running
OSX, although different versions). On the second machine, I cannot load the lh
surfaces files. For example
% tksurfer LS lh white
I guess you should upload the subject and we will take a look
On Fri, 13 Dec
2013, Rujing Zha wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Here is my -aseg pitcutre in the attachment. The Sgmtn lable is
Right-choroid-plexus. It is my understand that the aseg looks fine. Bruce,
can you tell me how to fix the -surfs?
Thank
Hello Pablo,
Please send me the recon-all.log file for the subject and I will take a
look.
-Zeke
On 12/13/2013 03:41 PM, pablo najt wrote:
> Dear FS,
> I am checking on the outputs of recon-all -all using the flag -openmp 8.
> As I did with standard recon-all -all comand line I was trying to ch
Dear FS,
I am checking on the outputs of recon-all -all using the flag -openmp 8. As I
did with standard recon-all -all comand line I was trying to check
brainmask.mgz, but there is not such file. Is there anything wrong with my
outputs? Or I should be checking a different file?
Thank you,
Pablo
Hi Paul, I was finally able to track down the bug. You can get a new
version from here:
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/5.3.0-patch/mri_convert.macos
copy it to $FREESURFER_HOME/bin/mri_convert
doug
On 12/08/2013 06:28 PM, prasser wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Sorry for the dela
Hi Anastasia, I was hoping to upgrade to Freesurfer 5.3 in order to use the new
motion detection feature of Tracula. The issue is that all of the preprocessing
has already been completed in Freesurfer 5.2 with the older version of Tracula.
Would I need to redo all the preprocessing in 5.3 in ord
Thanks a lot Jorge, that's a big help.
On 12 December 2013 23:54, jorge luis wrote:
> Hi Sean
>
> An important issue in the LME model concerns the centering of the times
> of measurement. It changes the interpretation of both the mean response and
> the variance of the random effects. If tij
I would have thought that it would have gotten all of them. You can try
something like --cwp .9
On 12/13/2013 01:03 PM, Jon Wieser wrote:
> HI doug
> thanks, that worked. it captured from 3-13 clusters for each contrast,
> not quite the 30-45 that I was seeing in the GUI.
> perh
Yes, the edges might not be right on because it is being sampled into a
2mm space. If you play with the --fillthresh you might be able to make
it line up better.
On 12/13/2013 12:55 PM, Emily Boeke wrote:
> Ok, it doesn't seem shifted anymore, but it is still not exactly the same as
> the lab
Ok, it doesn't seem shifted anymore, but it is still not exactly the same as
the label. Is this to be expected?
Emily
On Dec 13, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
>
> sorry, the command I gave you is not quite right. Use
>
> --regheader $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/mri/orig.mgz
>
> instea
use the command I gave you before just add --cwp .99 to it
doug
On 12/13/2013 12:25 PM, Jon Wieser wrote:
> Hi doug
> it's requesting the --sim option
>
> mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir MTA_ADHD_MJ --cwp .99
> ERROR: must spec --sim
>
>
>
> mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir MTA_ADHD_MJ --cwp .99 --si
Thanks Doug, now it is working perfectly!
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Douglas N Greve
wrote:
>
> Run
> tkregister2 --mov MEG_ROI.nii --targ path/to/spm8/canonical/single_subj_T1.nii
> --regheader --reg reg1.dat
> mri_matrix_multiply -im reg1.dat -im Mikel_SingleSubject_to_Colin.dat -om
> fi
Hi doug
it's requesting the --sim option
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir MTA_ADHD_MJ --cwp .99
ERROR: must spec --sim
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir MTA_ADHD_MJ --cwp .99 --sim
ERROR: flag --sim requires four arguments
what args do I give the --sim!
Jon
- Original Message -
From: "Doug
sorry, it is --cwp
On 12/13/2013 12:12 PM, Jon Wieser wrote:
> HI Doug
> MRI_glmfit-sim didn't recognize the --cwd option
>
>
> mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir MTA_ADHD_MJ --cwd .99
> ERROR: Flag --cwd unrecognized.
> --glmdir MTA_ADHD_MJ --cwd .99
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Do
HI Doug
MRI_glmfit-sim didn't recognize the --cwd option
mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir MTA_ADHD_MJ --cwd .99
ERROR: Flag --cwd unrecognized.
--glmdir MTA_ADHD_MJ --cwd .99
- Original Message -
From: "Douglas N Greve"
To: "Jon Wieser"
Cc: "freesurfer"
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 1
Run
tkregister2 --mov MEG_ROI.nii --targ
path/to/spm8/canonical/single_subj_T1.nii --regheader --reg reg1.dat
mri_matrix_multiply -im reg1.dat -im Mikel_SingleSubject_to_Colin.dat
-om final.reg.dat
Then use final.reg.dat
doug
On 12/13/2013 11:56 AM, Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga wrote:
> Hi Doug,
Hi Doug,
this is what I did. This system worked in other occasions. Could it be the
problem how the volume MEG_ROI.nii was created? My colleague had a Matlab
matrix of 256x256x256 and he converted it to a .nii file.
The registration matrix between single_subj_T1.nii and Colin27 is the
following on
Hi Doug,
this is what I did. This system worked in other occasions. Could it be the
problem how the volume MEG_ROI.nii was created? My colleague had a Matlab
matrix of 256x256x256 and he converted it to a .nii file.
The registration matrix between single_subj_T1.nii and Colin27 is the
following on
I'm sure that those clusters are not very significant. Try running
mri_glmfit-sim with --cwd .99 to capture all clusters
doug
On 12/12/2013 03:27 PM, Jon Wieser wrote:
> HI Doug,
> here's a screen shot, showing the clusters and a scatter plot for one of the
> 45 clusters.
> for this dataset, u
Try registering path/to/spm8/canonical/single_subj_T1.nii to Colin with
bbregister
doug
On 12/13/2013 11:09 AM, Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga wrote:
> Hi list,
> I am trying to visualize a .nii ROI coming from MEG, which is in
> Colin27 space.
>
> I can visualize it perfectly in mricron and tkmedit
sorry, the command I gave you is not quite right. Use
--regheader $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/mri/orig.mgz
instead
doug
On 12/13/2013 09:17 AM, Emily Boeke wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> I tried the mri_label2vol command but the mask created does not match the
> label. The mask is shifted so that it's post
Hi list,
I am trying to visualize a .nii ROI coming from MEG, which is in Colin27
space.
I can visualize it perfectly in mricron and tkmedit with the following
command:
tkmedit -f path/to/spm8/canonical/single_subj_T1.nii -overlay MEG_ROI.nii
-fthresh 0.5
(single_subj_T1.nii is Colin27)
but when
Hi Doug,
I tried the mri_label2vol command but the mask created does not match the
label. The mask is shifted so that it's posterior to the label (by ~15 slices),
and the shape of the blob is a little different. Any idea why this may be?
Emily
On Dec 12, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Douglas N Greve wrote
Is that ventricle? Check the aseg and correct it if needed
Cheers
Bruce
> On Dec 13, 2013, at 3:12 AM, "Rujing Zha" wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> How can I fix the false segmentation in the attachment.
> Thanks.
> All the best.
>
> 2013-12-13
> Rujing Zha
>
> _
I can precise the question, actually there are three:
1) ist the command correct?
mris_sample_parc -v -sdir subject001 rh ~/Documents/myROIfile.mgz
> rh.myROIfile.annot
>
2) I do not understand the meaning of this claimed file
cma_parcellation_colors.txt
Actually this does not exist. In the Wik
33 matches
Mail list logo