Hi Brendan
if you send us the sample we can take a look, but in general the
thickness is the average of the distance from the white to the pial with
the distance from the pial to the white. Sometimes things can seem like a
knot or tangle, but really it's just that the surface is almost parallel
Hi, I have a set of fairly old MRIs which have been run on freesurfer.
Occasionally scans have scrambled pial or white matter boundaries - a
knot-like appearance especially in sulci. I am wondering how freesurfer
estimates cortical thickness in these regions. For example, does it take
the pial boun
Dear Bruce,
Thank you very much for your patient instruction! In fact, I
used *"file--load
overlay*", then with below error information. Maybe I can try mris_calc.
Thanks again!
Best regards!
Joe
2010/2/2 Bruce Fischl
> it looks like you are trying to load the volume
yes, the pick atlas is just an atlas in standard space, so you lose all
the subject-specific info
doug
Sharmili 57 wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I want to do Cortical thickness analysis for regions defined by the
> wfu atlas in a MEG study. How can I define these areas in Freesurfer?
> It is imprecise to
sorry, I don't think we do, although doing it in matlab would be easy
enough
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, John Gelburg wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am using tksurfer to paint in single subject contrast (step 6 here:
> http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SpmPainting). However, I would
> like to see two
it looks like you are trying to load the volume measures as a surface, not
as an overlay. Use file->load overlay. Note that you can also use mris_calc
to generate the volume
measures.
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, keepmoon wrote:
> Dear Bruce,
>
>This is the all information in tci:
sorry, what is the WFU atlas?
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Sharmili 57 wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I want to do Cortical thickness analysis for regions defined by the wfu atlas
> in a MEG study. How can I define these areas in Freesurfer? It is imprecise
> to use the atlases implemented in Freesurfer, isn't it?
you need to run recon-all on your T1.nii, then register your spectroscopy
images to the recons (we use bbregister for this). Then you can use our
segmentations to analyze the spectroscopy data.
cheers,
Bruce
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, magnet
scanner wrote:
> Hi, Bruce,
>
> Thanks for your quick respo
Hi, Bruce,
Thanks for your quick response. here is what I am going to do with my
spectroscopy data;
1. mri_convert to convert all my T1 and T2 images to nifti format
mri_convert -it dicom {T1 filename} -ot nii {T1.nii} --out_orientation
RPS
mri_convert -it dicom{T2 filename} -ot nii {T2.ni
Hey,
I want to do Cortical thickness analysis for regions defined by the wfu atlas
in a MEG study. How can I define these areas in Freesurfer? It is imprecise to
use the atlases implemented in Freesurfer, isn't it?
Thanks for your help
Sharmili
_
Hi Mag,
no, the conform is a necessary step, but it wouldn't be applied to your
spectroscopy data in any case. You would register that to the anatomicals
(that were conformed). Is that what you mean?
Bruce
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, magnet
scanner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please excuse me if this is an old q
Hi,
Please excuse me if this is an old question. I was wondering if there is a
way of not doing conform when segmentation on the whole brain since I am
dealing with spectroscopy data and need affine matrix. So I have to make
sure the matrix is the same.
Thanks,
Mag
__
Dear Bruce,
This is the all information in tci:
%
$ tksurfer xalbertM lh inflated
surfer: current subjects dir: /home/Joe/study
surfer: not in "scripts" dir ==> using cwd for session root
surfer: session root data dir ($session) set to:
surfer: /home/Joe/study
surfer: Readin
Dear List,
I got a question/problem regarding unpacksdcmdir and mri_convert (of version
4.5.0 centos4_x86_64). When I unpack the siemens DICOMs (syngo B17, from a
recent tim trio) as bshorts, mri_info reports the proper FOV of 96; when I
unpack them as nii, I get a wrong FOV of 64 (also the xs
can you send us the complete output in the tcl window (the one with the %
prompt)
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, keepmoon wrote:
> Dear Bruce and All,
>
> In my *View--Configure*there are three button which are activated
> (*Light, caption and phase Encoded Dat Display*), without "*functional
> ov
we keep the subcortical information in a different atlas. The
surface-based one contains info about cortical geometry, which doesn't
apply for non-cortical structures
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Guang Zeng wrote:
>
> Hi, there,
>
> Kind of wondering, why FreeSurfer Surface Atlas does not contain subcor
Hi, there,
Kind of wondering, why FreeSurfer Surface Atlas does not contain subcortical
region?
Thanks!
Guang
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go
Dear Bruce and All,
In my *View--Configure*there are three button which are activated
(*Light, caption and phase Encoded Dat Display*), without "*functional
overlay*" option.
And in these activated buttons: light(light 0,...,light 3, with the
value, 0.4, 0.0, 0.6, 0.2. and bright
Postdoctoral position in multimodal imaging (autism) available
I would like to make known the availability of a two year postdoctoral position
in my laboratory. Strong MRI/DTI/Spectroscopy signal processing analysis skills
plus experience with and commitment to multimodal imaging are require
Hi Chunhui
you should not need to reorient your data. What version are you using?
cheers,
Bruce
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010,
chenchunhuichina wrote:
Hello Bruce, and Freesurfers,
Sorry for asking an old question, but I really need more confirmation.
I am running recon-all to processing my structura
have you tried changing the threshold in configure->functional overlay?
What kind of values do you see?
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, keepmoon wrote:
> Dear all experters,
>
>First I am appreciated for the help of Bruce.
> I tried to following his instruction, but I still have some problem and I
>
Dear all experters,
First I am appreciated for the help of Bruce.
I tried to following his instruction, but I still have some problem and I
can't show any result on the flated surface. I don't know whether my method
to calculate the volume is wrong or I display it wrongly. Expecting som
in some regions like left amygdata, the difference exceed 5%
2010-02-02
Chunhui Chen
_
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning
Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China 100875
发件人: Bruce Fischl
发送时间: 2010-01-22 12:38:11
收件人: chenchunhuichina
抄送:
主题: Re: Re: [Fr
Hello Bruce, and Freesurfers,
Sorry for asking an old question, but I really need more confirmation.
I am running recon-all to processing my structural data, but i am not sure do I
have to reorient the data or not. The data were acquired in sagital view, and
dicom data were converted into nift
24 matches
Mail list logo