Hi,
After I open the lh inflated surface, I want to open another pial surface
according to the freesurfer tutorial. But, the computer showed that
"core dumped"
"alloc: invalid block 0xb65d20: 0 0 75"
I tried many times, it showed the same above notes every time.
So, I don't known what's wit
Hi there,
I am comparing regions of activation from two different sets of
functional data, and would like to make a statement about the
likelihood that the area of overlap (i.e., the common area of
significant activation for both contrasts) is due to chance (or, more
precisely, my confide
Doug,
mri_surf2surf --hemi lh \ --srcsubject fsaverage \
--srcsurfval lh.ADnorm.thickness.mgh \ --fwhm 10 \
--trgsurfval lh.ADnorm.thickness.10.mgh
ERROR: Option --srcsubject unknown
this is the error that i'm getting.
--- Doug Greve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might be using a slightly o
where did you get the .gcs file?
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Nurunisa Neyzi wrote:
Hi,
when I try to redo the parcellation with another gcs file, and type the
command:
mris_ca_label 2560_4 lh lh.sphere.reg gcs_jan07/lh.outputclassifier.gcs
lh.renewparc.annot
I get the following error/log:
$Id: mris
You might be using a slightly order version that does not support the
--s option. If so, then you'll need to spec the src and trg subjects
explicitly.
Chacko Cherian wrote:
Hello users,
I wanted to use mri_surf2surf for surface smoothing
but it gives me an error saying --s is not an option.
Nurunisa,
Are you running v3.0.4 of freesurfer? If so, can you run the 'bugr'
script and send the results to me? This will tell me some 'bug report'
platform information. I'm guessing though that I may need to get your
data and recreate the error here locally, but we can start with the
basic in
Hi,
when I try to redo the parcellation with another gcs file, and type the
command:
mris_ca_label 2560_4 lh lh.sphere.reg gcs_jan07/lh.outputclassifier.gcs
lh.renewparc.annot
I get the following error/log:
$Id: mris_ca_label.c,v 1.16 2006/02/14 20:25:59 nicks Exp $
$Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.441 200
Hello all,
We are doing studies correlating neuropsychological measures of
executive function in
normal and clinical populations, epilepsy and sickle cell disease. I am
looking at the issue
of the amount of time allowed between acquiring the volumetric MR and
performing the battery
of neuropsych
almost, it will also change the center of ras coords (stored in the
volume), which may not matter to you, but changes how you get from voxel
indices to mm coords in the scanner. This is all documented (thanks to
Doug!) on our wiki.
Bruce
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, yanxia wrote:
Thanks, Bruce.
2.
Thanks, Bruce.
2. No, it's all done in what we call "conformed" space, which is the
original volume interpolated to 256^3, 1mm iso and 8 bits/voxel
If the original volume is 256^3, 1mm iso and 8 bits/voxel, whether
all output results are same as the original space?
Yan
At 10:17 AM 1/30/200
1. Yes.
2. No, it's all done in what we call "conformed" space, which is the
original volume interpolated to 256^3, 1mm iso and 8 bits/voxel
On Tue, 30
Jan 2007, yanxia wrote:
Thanks, Bruce.
I have another questions:
1> If the input binary segmentation is topologically correct, whether the
Thanks, Bruce.
I have another questions:
1> If the input binary segmentation is topologically correct, whether
the surface generated with the utility mri_tessellate is topologically correct.
2> All output results with "recon-all -s bert -autorecon-all" are
based on normalized space (template
Hi Joan,
1) When I call up aparc+aseg on the T1 image, I get the cortex that has been
parcellated, but I do not get the parcellation -- that information is in the
.annot files that seem to be viewable only using tksurfer and not tkmedit.
Is there a way to see the full parcellation on T1.mgz?
Hi all --
I'm still having difficulty with 2 problems that I think are solvable,
but I can't figure them out.
1) When I call up aparc+aseg on the T1 image, I get the cortex that has
been parcellated, but I do not get the parcellation -- that information
is in the .annot files that seem to be
14 matches
Mail list logo
