Dear Bruce,Thanks for your quick reply. I posted this question on the Neurolens-forum as well. I
too think it is just a problem of two different coordinate system. Rick
(of the Neurolens forum) mentioned that the pial surface coordinate to
world coordinate system is stated in a COR.info file. Howe
It depends on what you believe about how group membership affects the
change of the thickness with age. If you believe that it does not
affect it, then use doss. Otherwise use dods. You will lose a dof with
dods.
doug
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Antao Du wrote:
I want to test the difference of cor
I want to test the difference of cortical thickness in two groups and age is
accounted for as a covariate. Should I use "different offset, same slope" or
"different offset, different slope" in GLM model?
Thanks,
Antao
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesur
Oh, sorry, I forgot you were doing that. Setting -trgsubject to
fsaverage actually simplifies things a lot as you do not need to run
the paint command (or mri_surf2surf from the last email) as everything
will be on fsaverage to begin with.
doug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Doug, ju
It is definitely possible to display time courses in tksurfer, but I
usually load them from the cmd line with -timecourse. I don't think I've
ever done it from the gui. Kevin will have to look into that error.
If you'd like to try loading from the cmd line then:
cd fegroup/bold/ISI1TR_BERT_E
Thanks Doug, just a quick check that I understood correctly:
>
> There are two issues here:
>
> 1. Make sure that all of your subjects have been reconstructed with
> the same version of freesurfer (it looks like you have done this).
Correct
> 2. If you've used an "older" version of freesurfe
Dear Fellow Freesurfers,
I am trying to display HDR waveforms (time courses) for group level FIR
analyses in tksurfer.
When opening the group analysis data with tkmedit and a functional
overlay, obviously some sort of time course data is loaded, because I can
scroll back and forth between the dif
There are two issues here:
1. Make sure that all of your subjects have been reconstructed with
the same version of freesurfer (it looks like you have done this).
2. If you've used an "older" version of freesurfer for the recon, then
render (ie, paint) your results on average7 (the default
Do you mean that you have an average subject that you want to use or
that you need to make one? The talairach brain is an average.
doug
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Paymon Hosseini wrote:
hi
i used the following commands to create a group subjects:
func2tal-sess -res 4 -analysis rk_enc2_sm5 -sf s
As far as the orientation goes, mri_convert will assume that the spm
.mat file uses an RAS geometry. You should look at the volume in
tkmedit and go through each orientation to make sure that each looks
correct. ie, for sag the nose should be to the right, for ax the nose
should be at the top. Fo
hi
i used the following commands to create a group subjects:
func2tal-sess -res 4 -analysis rk_enc2_sm5 -sf sessid -df sesspar
isxavg-fe-sess -analysis rk_enc2_sm5 -sf sessid -df sesspar -group
Y15ENC2_sm5_grp -space tal
stxgrinder-sess -analysis rk_enc2_sm5 -all -space tal -s Y15ENC2_sm5_
Hi,
Backround: I am running a fixed effects group analysis with fsaverage
(mne305) as the target brain, and merging the activations across subjects
on the spherical surface. The individual functional sessions have been
co-registered to the individuals' structural brain reconstruction (i.e.
the reg
I think it's probably just displaying them in different coordinate
systems. tksurfer displays in an RAS coordinate system in which (0,0,0)
is essentially the center of the volume, whereas Neurolens is probably
displaying scanner coordinates. Does it matter to you? Not sure I
understand - is it
Hi,
I'm a relatively new FS user. Ive a single subject
functional dataset analyzed in FSL. I ran recon-all autorecon1 ,2 and 3 on the
subject's SPGR. Everything worked fine. i ran reg-feat2anat to register my
functionals to the anatomical but when i hit compare button in tkregister2 , the
great! I couldn't get it to crash here either, but our machines all have
a lot of RAM.
Bruce
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Lars M. Rimol wrote:
Hi,
I just ran make_average_subjects with increased swap (from 2G to 8G) on 178
subjects and now it worked, which would seem to indicate that it may have
been
Hi,
I just ran make_average_subjects with increased swap (from 2G to 8G) on
178 subjects and now it worked, which would seem to indicate that it
may have been a memory issue? I did not crash with 3, 10 and 113
subjects with 2G swap.
yours,
LMR
>Hmmm, I've run it on >100 subjects without trouble.
Dear freesurfer-users,I want to plot the freesurfer surface rendering (xxx.pial) in the program Neurolens. Loading the image gives no problem and Neurolens gives a beautiful rendering. However, when loading the pial surface in tksurfer I see a difference between the two renderings. The surface in t
17 matches
Mail list logo