Re: [Freesurfer] RE: make_average_surface

2005-10-07 Thread Brian Schweinsburg, Ph.D.
Dear Antao, Check the recent archives with the subject "make_average_subject error?" and the recent exchange with Nick. On Doug's advice, I added 'xv' to the beginning of each make_average* script So, #!/bin/tcsh -efxv Instead of #!/bin/tcsh -ef This produced the output that allowed the freesurf

RE: [Freesurfer] RE: make_average_surface

2005-10-07 Thread Antao Du
There is no any output when I add --echo. Antao > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nick > Schmansky > Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 3:04 PM > To: Antao Du > Cc: Freesurfer Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] RE: make_average_surface

Re: [Freesurfer] RE: make_average_surface

2005-10-07 Thread Nick Schmansky
Brian, Glad it worked. Clearly that portion of the script needs to be updated for better compatibility. The messages you are seeing (about nu_8_dxyz.mnc and COR-.info) can be ignored, as they are not errors. In the newest dev release, these messages have been suppressed, because they do not ind

Re: [Freesurfer] RE: make_average_surface

2005-10-07 Thread Brian Schweinsburg, Ph.D.
Nick, This appears to have done the trick. Make_average_subject ran and created the surfaces. It echos the following error message many times, but I assume this does not matter as it occurs with recon-all as well: INFO: Volume /tmp/mritotal_9750/nu_8_dxyz.mnc cannot be found. It also specifies the

Re: [Freesurfer] RE: make_average_surface

2005-10-07 Thread Nick Schmansky
Can you tell me which OS you are running? Type: cat /etc/redhat-release and uname -a On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 15:00 -0700, Antao Du wrote: > Hi, When I run make_average_surface --subjects AD1293 AD1297 AD1299 --out > average_cn, it finished within 1 second without any output and any error

Re: [Freesurfer] RE: make_average_surface

2005-10-07 Thread Nick Schmansky
This is a puzzling problem. Unfortunately I don't have access to a FC4 system to try to recreate what you are seeing. However, can you edit your make_average_subject/surface/volume scripts to comment-out these lines (shown here with comment-out chars added): #set n = `echo $argv | grep -e --help

Re: [Freesurfer] RE: make_average_surface

2005-10-07 Thread Brian Schweinsburg, Ph.D.
This sounds like a problem I am having, The same script works fine on my mac, but not on my FC4 machine. Here is the output, and a message I sent to before. I changed the flags to ³efxv² as Doug recommended, and here is the output for make_average_subject, make_average_volume and make_average_sur

Re: [Freesurfer] RE: make_average_surface

2005-10-07 Thread Nick Schmansky
Add --echo to the command to print its activity, and then send me the output. On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 15:00 -0700, Antao Du wrote: > Hi, When I run make_average_surface --subjects AD1293 AD1297 AD1299 --out > average_cn, it finished within 1 second without any output and any error > message. I don't

[Freesurfer] RE: make_average_surface

2005-10-07 Thread Antao Du
Hi, When I run make_average_surface --subjects AD1293 AD1297 AD1299 --out average_cn, it finished within 1 second without any output and any error message. I don't know what is wrong. Any helps there? I have not updated my freesurface so I downloaded make_average_surface from a post by Nick in Jul

Re: [Freesurfer] Group analysis

2005-10-07 Thread Brian T. Quinn
hi Daniel- i've encountered this before. see whta the value of fthresh is currently: puts $fthresh if it is an integer. add a decimal place to it: set fthresh 1.0 you may have to check each of the following: fthresh fmid fslope thanks, brian On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Daniel Goldenholz wrote: Hell

Re: [Freesurfer] subcortseg with files processed with older version

2005-10-07 Thread Nick Schmansky
Kristine, I think the subcortical labeling step requires the NU files, so these would have to be created for your old subjects. You can do this with: recon-all -nuintensitycor -subjid This will create the nu file (or files, if orig files are COR files). No other files are touched (no edits los

Re: [Freesurfer] difference between dev version and the final stable version?

2005-10-07 Thread Kevin Teich
I have a question about the current dev release - how different is the new 'stable' release going to be different from it? Probably not very different, but we are still working on a few critical bug fixes, and adding some final touches to the GUI programs. Can I start processing some brains u

[Freesurfer] Coregistration?

2005-10-07 Thread Nate Parks
Hello, I was wondering if anybody has any insight into the best way to coregister functionals with anatomicals in Freesurfer. I am looking for an automated method of coregistration. I noticed the spm_coregister command, but I am working with AFNI BRIK files, and I assume this requires Analyze for

Re: [Freesurfer] invalid command name "PNG"

2005-10-07 Thread Nick Schmansky
Xander, I haven't encountered this error message, and can't seem to track down its origin. Is it possible to upgrade your 2003 version of freesurfer to a newer version? If not, if you can email me the csurf file found in the $FREESURFER/bin directory, I might be able to figure out the problem.

Re: [Freesurfer] Group analysis

2005-10-07 Thread Daniel Goldenholz
Hello. I used paint-sess-new and surf-sess-new, and they opened a nice overlay without trouble. When I selected the configure overlay command from the menu, I get an error - 'error! expression didn't have a numeric value' The details are below. What can I do? expression didn't have numeric va

Re: [Freesurfer] Group analysis

2005-10-07 Thread Doug Greve
I don't think it will matter. Sunaina Fotedar wrote: Dear all, Would it be feasible to do a group analysis with the present developmental release of freesurfer on the subjects which were individually analyzed on the previous(old) version of freesurfer? In other words, is the Group analys

[Freesurfer] Group analysis

2005-10-07 Thread Sunaina Fotedar
Dear all, Would it be feasible to do a group analysis with the present developmental release of freesurfer on the subjects which were individually analyzed on the previous(old) version of freesurfer? In other words, is the Group analysis module of present version sensitive to the version in w