Speaking about match menus
I remember a menu program that I used way back in the day
I was able to build a menu and each item could be a sub menu or a
program or bat file.
It was basic but simple.
Anyone remember the menus from way back when, I prob recognize the name
if I saw it. :)
bmenu may
Couldn't there be a optional syncfat program that one could run at the
boot of freedos, and before shut down?
Could synchronize the FreeDos LFN and the M$ Dos storages mediums. It
may not,since isn't live access, violate
the patent. Many Programs write/read directly to and from the fat tables
wi
Visual Basic for Dos (1.0)
1) Anyone know if this runs on FreeDos
2) If it does does anyone know where to get it?
FreeBasic
1) Does it have GUI?
2) Will it run QuickBasic programs?
QuickBasic
Are there any alternatives for FreeDos, Or would that be FreeBasic
thanks,
Usul
-
>
>> FreeBasic
>> 1) Does it have GUI?
>>
I meant can you write applications with GUI under freedos with freebasic
Forms, textboxes simple stuff.
usul
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements
Has anyone ever considered an open source equivalent to windows 3.11?
Compatible like Reactos is compatible? At least on the surface, enough
to where
most basic applications would run?
usul
--
This SF.net email is spons
I have a VM with MS DOS 6.22, Windows 3.11, and Win32s available in a
QEMU VM. If you need comparative testing, let me know.
Thanks I am sure I will need lots of testing.
I also need to buy it cause I barely remember how it looked and worked. :)
---
* Calmira for GUI or someone could write a Program Manager for GUI like
Windows 3.x. Personally, I like the style of Windows 3.x over the
Windows 95 style of GUI.
I can't remember if Win 3.1 had context menus or not and I kind of like
a start menu/taskbar but thats not 3.11. If I do this right C
"If you own a computer that had MS-DOS 6.22 and Windows 3.1
on it at one point, but your install media are fried, try this
abandonware site."
Regardless of the age of the product and the ownership, if one has the
orig
media there shouldn't be a problem.
At least thats what I think, :)
usul
Travis Siegel wrote:
> Personally, I fail to see how lfn could be patented in the first place.
US Patent Law is screwed up. For example the company that I just left
has a patent on putting hardware on
carts for delivery to clients. Something like that should never have
been allowed.
But even if
Is internet access required for FDUPDATE? Or can the files be on a CD?
> - FDUPDATE makes wget downloading the index file from my server correctly,
> - FDUPDATE open the index file and load the package database correcyly,
> - It propose an update, basing on what has been found on user's system,
>
Windows 3x Issues
I was reading the Undocumented Dos book and according to it Win 3.x goes
to extraordinary lengths to insure that the operating system it is
running on os MSDos and not one of the alternatives.
Plus it replaces parts of DOS while running. (Either for underhanded as
the book hin
Bernd Blaauw wrote:
> Christian Masloch schreef:
>
>> Since disassembling MS-DOS is "considered legal" by UDOS and RBIL authors
>> (and these sources are "considered legal" by all members of the FreeDOS
>> project) I think there's no problem using some DLL examination tool.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
12 matches
Mail list logo
