Re: [Freedos-user] Results of testing fdbasecd.iso dated...

2006-08-22 Thread saywhat
Blair Campbell wrote: > Those are more likely ISOLinux issues, and most users will probably > not be using PART (which seems to interpret ISOLinux somehow as a > virus, which would somewhat seem like a PART bug to me at least). I figured that ISOLinux might be the culprit since PART was detec

Re: [Freedos-user] Results of testing fdbasecd.iso dated...

2006-08-22 Thread saywhat
Arkady V.Belousov writes: > 21-???-2006 14:07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote to > > sn>I will ask this question: If FreeDOS is released as is, and users > sn> start seeing these msgs on their PCs, will they know that the problem > sn> is *not* caused by FreeDOS? > > So, y

Re: [Freedos-user] Results of testing fdbasecd.iso dated...

2006-08-21 Thread Blair Campbell
Those are more likely ISOLinux issues, and most users will probably not be using PART (which seems to interpret ISOLinux somehow as a virus, which would somewhat seem like a PART bug to me at least). On 8/21/06, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > 21-Авг-2006 14:07 [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Freedos-user] Results of testing fdbasecd.iso dated...

2006-08-21 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 21-Авг-2006 14:07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote to freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net: >>sn> Editorial comment: >>sn>Obviously, some of these results are not ideal. >> What you want from FreeDOS in given case? sn>What do *I* want? Nothing. I'm just testing the rele

Re: [Freedos-user] Results of testing fdbasecd.iso dated...

2006-08-21 Thread saywhat
Arkady V.Belousov wrote to freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net: >sn> h) Boot from first harddisk (0x80) >sn> I fell into this because of the timeout. The next two lines on the >sn> screen are: >sn> Booting from local disk... >sn> Virus!!! > > This may be message from BIOS (if there i

Re: [Freedos-user] Results of testing fdbasecd.iso dated 08/19/2006

2006-08-21 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi! 19-Авг-2006 21:31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote to freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net: sn> h) Boot from first harddisk (0x80) sn> I fell into this because of the timeout. The next two lines on the sn> screen are: sn> Booting from local disk... sn> Virus!!! This ma

[Freedos-user] Results of testing fdbasecd.iso dated 08/19/2006, pt.2

2006-08-20 Thread saywhat
Continuing on the escape menu This menu is apparently inevitable. The installation process shows this menu regardless of what you choose on the preceding menu. E.g. after the previous tests, I created and formatted a new ~120MB partition just for FreeDOS. Then I rebooted from the FreeDO

Re: [Freedos-user] Results of testing fdbasecd.iso dated 08/19/2006

2006-08-19 Thread Blair Campbell
> The first menu (these are all text menus, BTW) > -- > The choices listed are: > > 1) Boot FreeDOS from CD > > Works. > > h) Boot from first harddisk (0x80) > > I fell into this because of the timeout. The next two lines on the > screen are: These are not handled by ISOLinux.

[Freedos-user] Results of testing fdbasecd.iso dated 08/19/2006

2006-08-19 Thread saywhat
Test environment .486DX4-100 w/32MB RAM .ATAPI cdrom drive .500MB hdd (with ~120MB of unused (no partition defined there) space) .The hdd also contains 2 ~60MB primary partitions and a ~250MB extended partition (which contains a few more (logical) partitions). All partition