On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 2:14 PM Cesar Gimenes wrote:
>
> “An XT is the kind of computer that won't die all by itself. You have to
> kill it on purpose."
>
> I really liked it!
> it's a shame I don't have any machines from that time.
I have one. They do die by themselves. Mine had a component
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 7:17 AM Tom via Freedos-user
wrote:
>
> Hope you dont mind this but I was just wondering about hardware
> survival rates. I have a 486 from 92 that still works but most of my
> later machines have died before being 5y old. Id did have a 20 year old
> 286 that had to go for
On 25/03/2020 16:57, Bret Johnson wrote:
I still have an old Pentium-class machine that I boot up
every once in awhile. I think it has an AMD CPU instead of
Intel, but don't remember for sure. Last time I booted it up
was probably 6 months ago.
“An XT is the kind of computer that won't die all by itself. You have to
kill it on purpose."
I really liked it!
it's a shame I don't have any machines from that time.
CRG
https://crg.eti.br
--
Cesar Gimenes
https://crg.eti.br
___
Freedos-user mailin
I still have an old Pentium-class machine that I boot up every once in awhile.
I think it has an AMD CPU instead of Intel, but don't remember for sure. Last
time I booted it up was probably 6 months ago. The problem with older computers
usually isn't the electronic parts (CPU's and RAM) but ra
Hope you dont mind this but I was just wondering about hardware
survival rates. I have a 486 from 92 that still works but most of my
later machines have died before being 5y old. Id did have a 20 year old
286 that had to go for space reasons even though it was still working. I
was wondering ho