JL> What do you do then something happened below:
JL> He alter my program without telling me or update the document, then
JL> send the altered program to a user, if that user corrupted the data
JL> because of the program, who will be the target? Me!
No. Wrong understanding.
Exactly, the GP
Hi!
20-Апр-2006 00:33 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Johnson Lam) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> >>Completely incorrect. If you release something under GNU GPL license
>> >>you cannot revoke that license. "The GNU General Public License is
>> >>intended to guarantee your freedom to share
Hi!
Johnson Lam wrote:
Forward an email from Jack, hoping everyone can understand what's
=
Re: his comments to you that FD-HIMEM has "completed development", I
have noted not 1 but 4 ERRORS in FD-HIMEM![... Text deleted ...]
I not seen anywhere mentions and descriptions for these
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:29:40 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
>What a load of nonsense this is.
If you talk about the GPL, there're misunderstanding here.
>That was not a particularly useful thing to do Johnson.
I think you missed some scene here, so I don't want to talk about the
"personal matter" betwe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
What a load of nonsense this is.
Johnson Lam wrote:
> Forward an email from Jack, hoping everyone can understand what's
> going on, I'd like the others to understand the whole thing, not out
> of context:
That was not a particularly useful thing to
At 01:43 PM 4/19/2006 +0800, Johnson Lam wrote:
Forward an email from Jack, hoping everyone can understand what's
going on, I'd like the others to understand the whole thing, not out
of context:
It is a flame, as you well know, but it seems you have become immune to any
sense of hesitation
Forward an email from Jack, hoping everyone can understand what's
going on, I'd like the others to understand the whole thing, not out
of context:
=
Johnson,
Thank you for forwarding Lucho's nice comments about QHIMEM to me.
Re: his comments to you that FD-HIMEM has "completed development",
