From: Dan Schmidt
--===1367417055986599984==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c05d174565b21053980b67a
--94eb2c05d174565b21053980b67a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Under plain DOS ? On what kind of machine ?
Sry, didn't see your response. FreeDos, Pent
From: Abe Mishler
> On Aug 1, 2016, at 5:24 AM, dmccunney wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:41 AM, dos386 wrote:
The bloat increase is just incredible :-D and sure RAM and CPU
consumption grows too
>>
>>> One man's bloat is another's feature. I've been running Mozilla code
>>> sin
From: dos386
> > The bloat increase is just incredible :-D and sure RAM and CPU
> > consumption grows too
> One man's bloat is another's feature. I've been running Mozilla code
> since it was still an internal Netscape
COOL ... at that time they refused to add support for MNG as it
would add 10
From: dos386
> On 21 July Eric Auer said:
> indeed I am trying to motivate people to use TLS/SSL
This (and without HeartBleed's, MD5-certificates, crippled 40-bit keys,...)
definitely makes sense when hunting around big bucks or sensitive
personal data ... however obligatory HTTPS for things lik
From: Ralf Quint
On 8/1/2016 2:14 PM, TJ Edmister wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 05:24:30 -0400, dmccunney
> wrote:
>
>> More to the point, who *needed* it?
>>
>> MNG is PNG with support for animation. PNG was created to be a
>> graphics format unencumbered by patents.
> If GIF was patent encumbe
From: Louis Santillan
dos386,
Could you please stop your excessive use of satirized names for
companies or technologies? I know you have a point you want to make
in there somewhere but you lose me when I have to parse and substitute
your satirized names for these things (like Flu$h for Flash).
From: dmccunney
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:41 AM, dos386 wrote:
>> > The bloat increase is just incredible :-D and sure RAM and CPU
>> > consumption grows too
>
>> One man's bloat is another's feature. I've been running Mozilla code
>> since it was still an internal Netscape
>
> COOL ... at that t
From: "TJ Edmister"
On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 05:24:30 -0400, dmccunney
wrote:
>
> More to the point, who *needed* it?
>
> MNG is PNG with support for animation. PNG was created to be a
> graphics format unencumbered by patents.
If GIF was patent encumbered, then it would seem that anyone who wante
From: dos386
> > There must be SOME browsers for DOS which can handle it!
> You talk as if you know for sure there is one.
> Is this the case ?
Links (well ... 2.13 works after minimal tests, but not tested on
80386 with < 16 MiO RAM)
DOSLYNX (HTTPS works, but has some other flaws, hopefully n
From: "Thomas Mueller"
from Jose Antonio Senna:
> On 26 july, Thomas Mueller said:
> > ...(I) also have run Links with graphics
> > in DOS, but that was years back.
> Do you remember on what machine you did this ?
> > I used Doug Kaufman's DOS port of Lynx for
> > online commerce but not b
from: Jose Antonio Senna
On 26 july, Thomas Mueller said:
> ...(I) also have run Links with graphics
> in DOS, but that was years back.
Do you remember on what machine you did this ?
> I used Doug Kaufman's DOS port of Lynx for
> online commerce but not banking, and not recently.
From: dmccunney
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:00 PM, dos386 wrote:
>
>> Want to browse the web with support for current standards? Use a
>> browser under Windows or a flavor of *nix. (I'm in Firefox
>
> FireFox 1 -> 4 MiO
> FireFox 48 -> 50 MiO
>
> The bloat increase is just incredible :-D and sur
From: dos386
> Can I have the good old paper mail of FreeDOS lists?
I meant: Can I have the good old paper mail __address__ of FreeDOS lists?
--
___
Freedos-user mailing list
> Under plain DOS ? On what kind of machine ?
Sry, didn't see your response. FreeDos, Pentium, but I'm guessing it may
run on less. Get a nic card, an Ethernet to Wireless bridge, and you are
good to go. And a lot of time, especially for Lynx. Links is slightly
unstable, but easy to setup and
dos386,
Could you please stop your excessive use of satirized names for
companies or technologies? I know you have a point you want to make
in there somewhere but you lose me when I have to parse and substitute
your satirized names for these things (like Flu$h for Flash).
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at
> On 21 July Eric Auer said:
> indeed I am trying to motivate people to use TLS/SSL
This (and without HeartBleed's, MD5-certificates, crippled 40-bit keys,...)
definitely makes sense when hunting around big bucks or sensitive
personal data ... however obligatory HTTPS for things like BUGzilla's
an
> On Aug 1, 2016, at 5:24 AM, dmccunney wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:41 AM, dos386 wrote:
The bloat increase is just incredible :-D and sure RAM and CPU
consumption grows too
>>
>>> One man's bloat is another's feature. I've been running Mozilla code
>>> since it was still an
On 8/1/2016 2:14 PM, TJ Edmister wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 05:24:30 -0400, dmccunney
> wrote:
>
>> More to the point, who *needed* it?
>>
>> MNG is PNG with support for animation. PNG was created to be a
>> graphics format unencumbered by patents.
> If GIF was patent encumbered, then it would
On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 05:24:30 -0400, dmccunney
wrote:
>
> More to the point, who *needed* it?
>
> MNG is PNG with support for animation. PNG was created to be a
> graphics format unencumbered by patents.
If GIF was patent encumbered, then it would seem that anyone who wanted
support for anim
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:41 AM, dos386 wrote:
>> > The bloat increase is just incredible :-D and sure RAM and CPU
>> > consumption grows too
>
>> One man's bloat is another's feature. I've been running Mozilla code
>> since it was still an internal Netscape
>
> COOL ... at that time they refused t
> > The bloat increase is just incredible :-D and sure RAM and CPU
> > consumption grows too
> One man's bloat is another's feature. I've been running Mozilla code
> since it was still an internal Netscape
COOL ... at that time they refused to add support for MNG as it
would add 10 KiO of bloat .
from Jose Antonio Senna:
> On 26 july, Thomas Mueller said:
> > ...(I) also have run Links with graphics
> > in DOS, but that was years back.
> Do you remember on what machine you did this ?
> > I used Doug Kaufman's DOS port of Lynx for
> > online commerce but not banking, and not recently.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:00 PM, dos386 wrote:
>
>> Want to browse the web with support for current standards? Use a
>> browser under Windows or a flavor of *nix. (I'm in Firefox
>
> FireFox 1 -> 4 MiO
> FireFox 48 -> 50 MiO
>
> The bloat increase is just incredible :-D and sure RAM and CPU
> co
> Can I have the good old paper mail of FreeDOS lists?
I meant: Can I have the good old paper mail __address__ of FreeDOS lists?
--
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@li
> > There must be SOME browsers for DOS which can handle it!
> You talk as if you know for sure there is one.
> Is this the case ?
Links (well ... 2.13 works after minimal tests, but not tested on
80386 with < 16 MiO RAM)
DOSLYNX (HTTPS works, but has some other flaws, hopefully needs less
RAM t
>You talk as if you know for sure there is one.
>Is this the case ?
I use two that do SSL/TLS quite adequately:
Links2
http://links.twibright.com/download.php
lynx also does ssl, but this version takes some work to get going:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.msdos.djgpp/flY264GkHV
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I use mostly Mozilla Firefox or Seamonkey. There are other graphical
> browsers, such as Qupzilla, Midori and Netsurf, but I am not aware of any
> attempt to port any of these browsers to DOS.
I use Firefox as my production browser, and
> On 21 July Eric Auer said:
> > indeed I am trying to motivate people to use TLS/SSL ;-)
> > There must be SOME browsers for DOS which can handle it!
> You talk as if you know for sure there is one.
> Is this the case ?
> I did look at Mikulas' Links before Rugxulo
> mentioned it in this dis
28 matches
Mail list logo
