On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 23:12, Jim Hall wrote:
>
> I think it's great that DRDOS updated their statement on CP/M.
Agreed.
> I would
> have preferred he used a recognized open source license like MIT or
> GNU GPL or another license, rather than make his own statement here,
> but this is definitely
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 19:35, Travis Siegel wrote:
> For some reason, I'd thought DRDOS has been free for quite some time.
No.
To add to what others have said about licences and things:
Lineo published the source code of DR DOS 7.01. (And AFAIK only the
kernel and a few core components such as
> On the assumption that DR-DOS is included among the CP/M derivatives,
> which would agree with the fact that DRDOS, Inc. did sell DR-DOS 7.xx
> (and the shortlived DR-DOS 8.xx) and so had the rights to those, this
> means that EDR-DOS is now free!
that's a rather far fetched assumption.
DR-
On 7/17/2022 5:10 PM, Jim Hall wrote:
Questions arise when you consider if you can re-use the CP/M source
code in another project that uses a recognized open source license -
or if you want to re-use code from another project (under an open
source license) to improve CP/M. Of course, these ques
On 7/17/2022 4:44 PM, C. Masloch wrote:
For some reason, I'd thought DRDOS has been free for quite some time.
I remember when opendos was released as opensource, (I have a copy of
it around here somewhere), but I thought DRDOS was released as
freeware sometime after that, though I don't reme
