> On the assumption that DR-DOS is included among the CP/M derivatives, > which would agree with the fact that DRDOS, Inc. did sell DR-DOS 7.xx > (and the shortlived DR-DOS 8.xx) and so had the rights to those, this > means that EDR-DOS is now free! that's a rather far fetched assumption. DR-DOS is as much a CP/M derivative as Windows 11 is a derivative of MSDOS 2.0 OTOH who cares if DR-DOS is more or less free? I don't see the relevance. Tom _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
- [Freedos-user] CP/M "and derivatives" legal status... Liam Proven
- Re: [Freedos-user] CP/M "and derivatives" leg... C. Masloch
- Re: [Freedos-user] CP/M "and derivatives"... Travis Siegel
- Re: [Freedos-user] CP/M "and derivatives&q... C. Masloch
- Re: [Freedos-user] CP/M "and derivativ... Jim Hall
- Re: [Freedos-user] CP/M "and derivativ... Travis Siegel
- Re: [Freedos-user] CP/M "and derivatives&q... Liam Proven
- Re: [Freedos-user] CP/M "and derivatives"... Jim Hall
- Re: [Freedos-user] CP/M "and derivatives&q... Travis Siegel
- Re: [Freedos-user] CP/M "and derivatives&q... Liam Proven
- Re: [Freedos-user] CP/M "and derivatives"... tom ehlert