On 2012-11-12 01:20 (GMT-0600) Rugxulo composed:
> DOSEMU isn't in any "official" Fedora repo
My other 24/7 machine runs openSUSE, with DOSEMU from standard repo. I find
OpenSUSE's installation the best of any bar none, and Fedora's (and Mageia's,
and *buntu's) lacking hugely in flexibility by
On 2012-11-12 01:11 (GMT-0600) Rugxulo composed:
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> Maybe what could meet her needs is OS/2 or eCS. Last century at least they
>> were always better at multitasking DOS apps than DOS ever could hope to be.
>> OS/2 as eComStation is currently available to run on modern hardwar
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Karen Lewellen
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012, Felix Miata wrote:
>
>> Does she have or have access to DesqView 386? DV is how I multitasked before
>> switching to OS/2 Warp.
>
> Indeed? I am sure she does not have it, I will hunt for this tonight.
>
> It didn
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012-11-11 20:01 (GMT-0500) Karen Lewellen composed:
>
>> Eleni wants to leave windows behind for a
>> variety of reasons. She will have to decide what is more important for her,
>> multitasking, as indeed Dr dos 7.03 includes as a pa
Hi,
Sorry in advance for too many details, but in case anybody cares
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Mateusz Viste
wrote:
>
> You could give a try with the new version of FDNPKG (v0.91, released a
> few minutes ago) - I don't think it will change much, but one never know...
I doubt it.
On 2012-11-11 22:44 (GMT-0500) Karen Lewellen composed:
>> I have Novell DOS 7 also.
> what is novell dos 7?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novell_dos
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg.
I wonder what the brandand firmware revisions the harddrive(s) in
question are and whether or not they have a size-limiting jumper
connected. Doesn't such a jumper, in combination with hardcoded BIOS
settings, control the cylinders-heads-sectors that "the DOS" flavor
sees? And doesn't DOS itsel
Hi,
Last one I am answering tonight...then back to my 50 shades of Grey
series. in context below.
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012, Felix Miata wrote:
> Maybe I missed it, but I haven't seen proof 7.03 cannot coexist with a
> "large" HD. Is it a lack of FAT32/>2GB partition support? That's her obstacle?
H
Karen,
What hardware buildout do you have exactly? Are you using ISA modems or
network cards to connect to the internet? What peripherals do you have
connectedto your system? Do you have a local area network? How are you
obtaining your hardware?
I'm quite interested in your hardware buildout.
very interesting points, basically translating into what she is willing to
try.
the reference to 286 made me laugh out loud, my own desktop is a Pentium 3
with 784 meg of memory but I had mine built for me.
The Dell laptop inspirum 7500 if memory serves was built around 2000 I
think.
One can a
On 2012-11-11 20:01 (GMT-0500) Karen Lewellen composed:
> Eleni wants to leave windows behind for a
> variety of reasons. She will have to decide what is more important for her,
> multitasking, as indeed Dr dos 7.03 includes as a part of its structure,
> or a large hard drive, which cannot be ac
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Karen Lewellen
wrote:
>
> the answer is no then, thanks.
Beware of simple answers. They may be right most of the time, but
there are often workarounds and dark corners.
> As I said in my reply to John, Eleni wants to leave windows behind for a
> variety of r
There re two modes on. Uefi system, bios-MBr and uefi-gpt
The mbr approach is limited to 2.2tb and other can support
Larger that that, I not sure if it uses a special uefi sys partition
To load the firmware ,,
-Chris
Http://digitalatoll.com/
On Sunday, November 11, 2012, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
> Op
the answer is no then, thanks.
As I said in my reply to John, Eleni wants to leave windows behind for a
variety of reasons. She will have to decide what is more important for her,
multitasking, as indeed Dr dos 7.03 includes as a part of its structure,
or a large hard drive, which cannot be ac
Hi John,
not at all really.
I have used dos exclusively for all of my computing since 1988. I
presently run an augmented edition of ms dos 7.1 circle 2005 or so that
meets my pure dos needs totally.
Because I use dos though, i was contacted by a young woman who lives in
America and her friend
Hi Karen,
> does freedos has its own multitasking included in its latest package?
Not really. I remember there was something built into the
DREMM386 and DR-DOS, but I am not sure how far that would
work for what you need. Also, MS DOS had a task swapping
feature in DOSSHELL. As far as I remember
Karen,
There must be a program you need to run using a DOS environment. Am I
right about this? If so is it a well known package or a custom software
package? Some of older DOS software packages required a more traditional
DOS filesystem like FAT-16.
The decision as to which filesystem to use i
thanks, I think.
talk about pulling teeth.
so freedos can see drives as large as 2 thousand gig, which was not
clearly stated.
I almost hesitate to ask the next one, since straight answers come in
diagonals. but does freedos has its own multitasking included in its latest
package.
If the fat 3
Hi!
> So, if I translate this.
> The person wanting to consider freedos, could not do as I can do on my ms
> dos 7.1 system, format a 20 gig drive split it into 10 gig sizes and have
> freedos recognize the fat 32 partitions thus created?
10 GB is much smaller than 2 TB, so there is no problem
So, if I translate this.
The person wanting to consider freedos, could not do as I can do on my ms
dos 7.1 system, format a 20 gig drive split it into 10 gig sizes and have
freedos recognize the fat 32 partitions thus created?
Likewise they would be limited to a 2 gig drive regardless in freedos
Hi, to continue the thread...
Slightly below 2 GB are the normal limit for classic FAT16,
although variants exist. However, if you use FAT32, then
you could put 2 TB into a single drive letter! A Terabyte
is 1000 or 1024 Gigabyte, depending on whom you ask ;-)
Another limit is the MBR partitioni
Op 11-11-2012 19:57, Karen Lewellen schreef:
> realizing there may be other answers, let me try that again.
> you are saying if one intends installing freedos as the only operating
> system on a hard drive it cannot see a drive larger than 2 gig at all?
> or are you saying that it only creates fat
realizing there may be other answers, let me try that again.
you are saying if one intends installing freedos as the only operating
system on a hard drive it cannot see a drive larger than 2 gig at all?
or are you saying that it only creates fat 16 partitions with the gig
limit?
Meaning you canno
Hi!
You could give a try with the new version of FDNPKG (v0.91, released a
few minutes ago) - I don't think it will change much, but one never know...
About the vbox/dosemu issues with smmu.exe - emulation is never perfect,
and FreeDOS being a niche system, I fear that we'll have to live with
Hi all,
Today I released a new version of the FreeDOS Network Packager (FDNPKG):
v0.91. This is a minor update.
What's new?
FDNPKG v0.91 [11 Nov 2012]
- [fix] fixed a memory leak when aborting package installation due to
pkgname.lst file access error,
- [new] Added support for the FreeDOS
Op 11-11-2012 16:22, Karen Lewellen schreef:
> Hi folks,
> Asking for the person still doing that Dr dos 703 thing.
> What is the largest drive capacitor for the current edition of freedos?
> Thanks,
> Karen
2 terabyte total disksize is the maximum allowed for a single
MBR-partitioned storage dev
Hi folks,
Asking for the person still doing that Dr dos 703 thing.
What is the largest drive capacitor for the current edition of freedos?
Thanks,
Karen
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster
27 matches
Mail list logo
