On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:36 AM, dmccunney wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Michael C. Robinson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The latest version of Windows always seems to need more computing
>>> horsepower than the last one...
>>
>> Not just Windows.
Is there a way to make FreeDOS be able to backscroll? Like in CMD, or
something where you use the page up and page down keys? Thanks,
--- Kenny
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> Is FreeDOS HD access as slow as PC or MS DOS? IIUC, the latter use slow 16
> bit BIOS code, which is what makes it painful for me to use compared to
> running DOS apps in an OS/2 VM.
Yes, probably just as slow as it also uses the BIOS.
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:36 AM, dmccunney wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Michael C. Robinson
> wrote:
>
>> The latest version of Windows always seems to need more computing
>> horsepower than the last one...
>
> Not just Windows. I run FreeDOS ...
Heh, I did have one guy tell m
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Michael C. Robinson
wrote:
> The latest version of Windows always seems to need more computing
> horsepower than the last one...
Not just Windows. I run FreeDOS on an old notebook with an 867mhz
Transmeta CPU, an IDE 4 HD, and 256MB of RAM (of which 16MB is grabb
Is FreeDOS HD access as slow as PC or MS DOS? IIUC, the latter use slow 16
bit BIOS code, which is what makes it painful for me to use compared to
running DOS apps in an OS/2 VM. Is FreeDOS disk I/O in the same class as 32 &
64 bit operating systems speed-wise?
--
"The wise are known for their
Freedos doesn't support any printers, but software programs which run
on freedos do.
For example, if running WordPerfect 6.0, dos version, you will need a
Wordperfect driver for
that printer, or one which is close enough. HP Laserjets are a good
bet, the pre USB ones in
particular like the 6
