Hi,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Michael B. Brutman
wrote:
>
> The current DOS path handling in the FTP server is kind of broken - it
> works for some clients, but not for others. Ironically, the smarter the
> FTP client the less likely it is to work.
> ...
> There is no winning unless I sta
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Bret Johnson wrote:
>
> With some limited exceptions (like 4DOS), the "expansion" of batch
> functionality has generally been provided by external utilities,
Right. 4DOS is almost overkill and does many many things.
> There's also REXX, which already comes
Op 21-9-2011 22:09, Ralf A. Quint schreef:
> Sorry, I think it is more feasible to use any of the million and a
> half "calc/eval" programs that are out there for DOS...
I've always wondered why you by default can't perform any arithmetic
operations in an operating system (DOS) that's designed to
At 12:48 PM 9/21/2011, Eric Auer wrote:
>Hi :-)
>
> >> Look this nice code that we cant run on Freedos
> >
> >> http://windowstipoftheday.blogspot.com/2005/03/ms-dos-calculator.html
>
>To do calculations in FreeDOS, use the FreeCOM feature
>to SET an environment variable from the output of any
>pr
Hi :-)
>> Look this nice code that we cant run on Freedos
>
>> http://windowstipoftheday.blogspot.com/2005/03/ms-dos-calculator.html
To do calculations in FreeDOS, use the FreeCOM feature
to SET an environment variable from the output of any
program and use CALC387 (only 1024 byte) as calculato
Marco Achury wrote on Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:29:19 -0430
> A more realistic goal to Freedos may be to expand the batch programming
> language to be compatible with newer windows versions, but keeping retro
> compatible with DOS batch programs.
> Look this nice code that we cant run on Freedos
> ht
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 08:18 -0500, Michael B. Brutman wrote:
> The current DOS path handling in the FTP server is kind of broken - it
> works for some clients, but not for others. Ironically, the smarter
> the FTP client the less likely it is to work.
Drive and path handling has always been brok
With some limited exceptions (like 4DOS), the "expansion" of batch
functionality has generally been provided by external utilities, rather than
being integrated into the kernel. E.g., once in awhile I use the old PC
Magazine utility called STRINGS, and I know there are other similar utilities
The current DOS path handling in the FTP server is kind of broken - it
works for some clients, but not for others. Ironically, the smarter the
FTP client the less likely it is to work.
The problem has to do with exposing drive letters in the path.
Filezilla in particular detects the drive le
> Long messages have appeared from people that want a multitasking DOS
> How about developing more TSRs for multitasking?
???
> A more realistic goal to Freedos may be to expand the batch
> programming language to be compatible with newer windows
> versions, but keeping retro compatible with DOS
Hi
> Long messages have appeared from people that want a multitasking DOS.
>
> A more realistic goal to Freedos may be to expand the batch programming
> language to be compatible with newer windows versions, but keeping retro
> compatible with DOS batch programs.
How about developing more TSRs fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
