I emailed Robert off-list to see if I might move it to freedos.org. I'd like
to see his forum continue in some way.
On Sep 13, 2011 9:53 PM, "Marco Achury" wrote:
Would be great to keep the forum archive, at least for read-only so people
ca nsearch answers to old questions, this is an important
Would be great to keep the forum archive, at least for read-only so
people ca nsearch answers to old questions, this is an important
knowledge base.
El 13/09/2011 07:30 p.m., Michael B. Brutman escribió:
> Here is the link to the announcement:
>
> http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?
On 9/13/2011 7:10 PM, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> Look at it this way, it is extremely hard to support modern hardware in
> a DOS style environment because DOS allowed application programs to use
> hardware directly. Jim Hall has said himself that he has limited
> interest in the GUI end and most
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 01:00 +, Zbigniew wrote:
> 2011/9/14, Michael C. Robinson :
>
> > [..] I'd say that Freedos has it's
> > uses, but without active development on a variant that can take
> > advantage of multiple cores and modern hardware, there are probably a
> > dwindling number of uses
2011/9/14, Michael C. Robinson :
> [..] I'd say that Freedos has it's
> uses, but without active development on a variant that can take
> advantage of multiple cores and modern hardware, there are probably a
> dwindling number of uses for it. Without hardware protection and memory
> protection, F
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 19:00 -0500, Michael B. Brutman wrote:
> Here is the link to the announcement:
>
> http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=10488
>
>
> To me this is a serious problem - losing a piece of the DOS community is
> bad. Losing the place where a lot of the programm
Here is the link to the announcement:
http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=10488
To me this is a serious problem - losing a piece of the DOS community is
bad. Losing the place where a lot of the programmers hang out is even
worse.
Mike
