On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 09:59:27 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
Hi,
>Dumb question: Is UIDE.SYS _only_ for native [[motherboard]]
>controllers? I tried it with two PCI adapter card controllers -- one IDE
>controller and one SATA controller and UIDE.SYS did not find drives connected
>to either of the
I like this. Why not release it now?
--
--
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Marco A. Achury
Tel: +58-(212)-6158777
Cel: +58-(414)-3142282
Fax: +58-(212)-2410828
Skype: marcoachury
www.geocities.com/marcoachury
--
Crystal Reports - New
Yes, but the project was formulated with a clear object: Create a free
replacement for MS-DOS.
And take 10+ years to get it !!!
Create a free replacement for a Win9x system is a bigger objective,
and is different enough to be a different project.
2009/6/17, Mike Webb :
> (Prior posters' names
(Prior posters' names deleted to protect the guilty)
> > and - BTW - FreeDOS does NOT want to be a Windows 9x replacement.
> Of course not. It wants to be a MS-DOS replacement.
It continually amazes me how, especially in the Free Software world,
non-sentient things like "software", "information",
Eric Auer escreveu:
> The usual
> Linux "configure, make, make install" steps are not so common for
> DOS apps.
in fact, it works so well in Linux/Unix because the whole system was
designed for it to work.
in DOS you most of the time cannot the make program that you want. Keep
in mind that eac
Hi Kurt,
>> Ok, I give up; I knew that linux has 'make' and 'make install' all
>> over the place, but, until this afternoon,
>> I never knew that dos has it. While attempting to install some parts
>> of HX and GEM to djgpp, I was struck
>> by this: "use 'make' to configure the includes(headers)
Each directory that has stuff to be built has its own (customized)
"makefile". From the DOS command line, "cd" to the desired directory,
and run command "make" or "make install" (as appropriate). This results
in the directory's files being built (using the information in
'makefile').
Sometime
> Yes, I prettymuch get that, but for instance that djgpp hack someone
> mentioned; it has a file named
> 'makefile', but in what directory should it be placed?
I guess that you are refering to my previous post. It's hard to follow because
the newsreader which I use did put your recent post i
Hello
> Ahhh, it's amazing; not one tutorial specifically for the dos version of
> 'make'; even what there is, not too
> specific. To wit: indeed, some thing you are trying to install,say , HX,
> GEM, etc., they do include makefiles,
[snip]
You mentioned HX so I'm forced to feel somewhat "resp
Yes, I prettymuch get that, but for instance that djgpp hack someone
mentioned; it has a file named
'makefile', but in what directory should it be placed? I mean, there are
*several* files in these distros
named 'makefile', so without messing around with the path, if I explicitly
use make -f makefi
I know HX is not a compiler; I meant having two c++ compilers, like mingw
and djgpp at the same
time. They can have naming conflicts.--kurt.
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplifie
- Original Message -
From: kurt godel
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 12:11 PM
Subject: [Freedos-user] make-me crazy.
Ahhh, it's amazing; not one tutorial specifically for the dos version of
'make'; even what there is, not too
specific
Ahhh, it's amazing; not one tutorial specifically for the dos version of
'make'; even what there is, not too
specific. To wit: indeed, some thing you are trying to install,say , HX,
GEM, etc., they do include makefiles,
but they don't tell you where to put the makefile. So, you keep trying to
use t
kurt godel wrote:
> Ok, I give up; I knew that linux has 'make' and 'make install' all
> over the place, but, until this afternoon,
> I never knew that dos has it. While attempting to install some parts
> of HX and GEM to djgpp, I was struck
> by this: "use 'make' to configure the includes(header
> Ok, I give up; I knew that linux has 'make' and 'make install' all over the
> place,
> but, until this afternoon, I never knew that dos has it.
NO.
> While attempting to install some parts of HX and GEM to djgpp, I was struck
> by this: "use 'make' to configure the includes(headers) and librar
> Before I even try messing with hx extender
???
> does anyone know if it will work out-of-the-box with djgpp
HX has a DGJPP hack, untested by me (ask FloX)
> which I am used to, and I don't trust having two compilers
> of the same language present simultaneously.
HX is NOT a compiler.
> Also
> and - BTW - FreeDOS does NOT want to be a Windows 9x replacement.
Of course not. It wants to be a MS-DOS replacement. The initial question
wasn't to transform FreeDOS into a GUI magically but to create a new
project for a GUI running on FreeDOS.
-
17 matches
Mail list logo
