Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

Robert Riebisch escreveu: >> Adobe Brain CS(Common Sense) 3 is available now for $1699, an arm, a >> leg, and an empty cranium. > Please buy one and get a serious mail client, which doesn't send bloated > HTML! :-P 8 Kbyte for a single sentence must be a joke. Of course, this *was* a joke ;) Ala

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

Jonathan W. wrote: > I think it was that sentence + the other quoted emails. From the email > header: > > "Content-Type: text/plain;" > > It's not bloated HTML. :P It is also HTML: "Content-Type: text/html;" Gmail sends your messages in "plain" text AND HTML!

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

I think it was that sentence + the other quoted emails. From the email header: "Content-Type: text/plain;" It's not bloated HTML. :P Skyler On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Robert Riebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jonathan W. wrote: > > > Adobe Brain CS(Common Sense) 3 is available now for

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

Jonathan W. wrote: > Adobe Brain CS(Common Sense) 3 is available now for $1699, an arm, a > leg, and an empty cranium. Please buy one and get a serious mail client, which doesn't send bloated HTML! :-P 8 Kbyte for a single sentence must be a joke. Robert Riebisch -- BTTR Software http://www.btt

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

Adobe Brain CS(Common Sense) 3 is available now for $1699, an arm, a leg, and an empty cranium. Skyler On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Robert Riebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Reichenbach wrote: > > > Yes, them are far away from being at least sufficient. > > Best is Brain 1.0. But m

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

Michael Reichenbach wrote: > Yes, them are far away from being at least sufficient. Best is Brain 1.0. But many people lack this "software". ;-) Robert Riebisch -- BTTR Software http://www.bttr-software.de/ - This SF.Net e

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

iw2evk wrote: > someone know if exist a a free UPDATED antivirus for dos? F-PROT for DOS (including latest signatures) can be found at . You could also buy a license for NOD32 for Windows, which entitles you to use their DOS-based scanner. The executable hasn

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

Robert Riebisch schrieb: > Eric wrote: > >> I concur about the commercial virus scanners. > > But these are also not perfect. ;-) Yes, them are far away from being at least sufficient. Antivirus / Personal Firewall is a illusion of security. Antivirus is a nice tool, but only a tool. Antivirus

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

Eric wrote: > I concur about the commercial virus scanners. But these are also not perfect. ;-) Two weeks ago Trend Micro Worry-Free (TMWF) installed to a customer's PC detected a simple virus (installed as a Windows service to send junk mails via Russian SMTP servers), but couldn't remove the f

Re: [Freedos-user] htmlhelp proofreading

Hi, Just a couple comments. > command x: > This a wrong sentence is > sb (should be) > This is a wrong sentence How about this: command x: [header name] This a wrong sentence is sb This is a wrong sentence ^^I added [header] to make it a bit faster to track down the error. Will that be acce

[Freedos-user] htmlhelp proofreading

Hi all, here is a message from HTMLHELP update guru Fritz :-) I modified some minor things for clarity / layout / etc. The summary: A new English HTMLHELP is ready and there is a good deal of a new German HTMLHELP as well, but we need your help for proofreading and to fix last flaws. Eric Hi

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

HI, just my opinion: if you are *really* serious about scaning for viruses in dos, then you should: 1) Use Eric's port of Clamav with updated definitions and even port a new version. 2) Clamav is too new, so it not very good at detecting old dos viruses. Then you should also une one old-timer

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

I concur about the commercial virus scanners. I repaired someones XP system yesterday. Commercial scanners detected 2 rootkits, 6 viruses and 2 trojans. I ran ClamWin and it missed all of these. I like ClamAV because of its low overhead. F-Prot would still work on older viruses floating aro

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

Eric Auer schrieb: > Hi! > >> Antivirus for DOS is good like Antivirus for *any barely used OS*, >> because the barely used OS isn't target for viruses. > > True, although you get the same effectivity by booting > a known-clean readonly CD/DVD with any OS at all for > your antivirus work :-). Ye

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 23:13:56 -0800 (PST) > From: iw2evk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos > > > Hi, > someone know if exist a a free UPDATED antivirus for dos? > > Thanks > > Roberto if you trust arachne's maintainer glennmcc, then you can use the last

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

Hi! > Antivirus for DOS is good like Antivirus for *any barely used OS*, > because the barely used OS isn't target for viruses. True, although you get the same effectivity by booting a known-clean readonly CD/DVD with any OS at all for your antivirus work :-). In addition, OSes like XP or Linux

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

Antivirus for DOS is good like Antivirus for *any barely used OS*, because the barely used OS isn't target for viruses. Therefore you can use it as second operating system and/or other boot medium (USB, CD or w/e) and do a robust scan. -mr Jonathan W. schrieb: > I'm not sure there'd be much to up

Re: [Freedos-user] Updated Antivirus for dos

iw2evk schrieb: > Hi, > someone know if exist a a free UPDATED antivirus for dos? > > Thanks > > Roberto Afaik there is none still updated one, I was looking for it some time ago. - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Mob