In terms of fulfillment of goals, yes, FreeDOS is much farther ahead.
In terms of things that can be done, ReactOS has much larger shoes to
fill. ReactOS aspires to be able to do as much as Windows, whereas
DOS is probably somewhat simpler to clone. But yes, FreeDOS is
probably more useable at th
I took a look at the reactOS project today.
I'm assuming that you folks would agree that Freedos
is much further along than reactOS?
That is, it would not be foolhardy to expect to use
Freedos in some actual business applications?
It doesn't appear to me that reactOS is anywhere near
being usa
On Saturday 23 September 2006 21:22, Marcel Tschudin wrote:
> After the hint on Microsoft I tried to install their Virtual Server 2005,
> but it refuses an installation on Windows XP Home edition...
>
> Now I'm on the page of VMware and wonder what would be more appropriate for
> my application, th
If you can get hold of it, you might be better off using an older version of
Virtual Server 2005, ie Microsoft's Virtual PC 2003. I don't think you'll
have the same issues with that and Windows XP Home. Hope this helps a
little. Regards Chris.
___
If you use the Microsoft one you can access the virtual hard disk filesdirectly with a program called Winimage which makes moving files to and from
the virtual machine really easy. Regards Chris.It seems that my mail, where I indicated that the Microsoft Server didn't work, arrived just a bit too l
If you use the Microsoft one you can access the virtual hard disk files
directly with a program called Winimage which makes moving files to and from
the virtual machine really easy. Regards Chris.
P.S. have you thought about running the program under Windows XP in a dos
session?? It may be a bit
After the hint on Microsoft I tried to install their Virtual Server 2005, but it refuses an installation on Windows XP Home edition...Now I'm on the page of VMware and wonder what would be more appropriate for my application, the VMware Player or the VMware Server?
Framework was great, you know its
> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:07:20 +0300
> From: "Marcel E. Tschudin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Freedos-user] DOS on VM ?
> To:
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Hello everybody out there
>
> Jus
>Message: 1
>Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:07:20 +0300
>From: "Marcel E. Tschudin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Freedos-user] DOS on VM ?
>To:
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
>Hello everybody out there
>
>
First, thank you Eric and Aitor for your replies.
> 1) Which of the two VMs would be preferable for this application.Neither. You can use Bochs or QEMU which are both free and open source ;-)But well, VMWare will work, too. As probably all others...
There might be other technical criteria which mig
Hello,
2006/9/23, Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I would like to get Ashton Tate's old Framework III running on my computer
> > with Windows XP. This seem to be possible by installing a virtual machine
> > and on this DOS. From what I could find out so far, there are two VM
> > freeware one
> I would like to get Ashton Tate's old Framework III running on my computer
> with Windows XP. This seem to be possible by installing a virtual machine
> and on this DOS. From what I could find out so far, there are two VM
> freeware one from Microsoft (Microsoft Virtual Server 2005) and one from
Hello everybody out there
Just joined the list hoping to get from somewhere an advice on how to do.
I would like to get Ashton Tate's old Framework III running on my computer
with Windows XP. This seem to be possible by installing a virtual machine
and on this DOS. From what I could find out so
13 matches
Mail list logo
