Re: IWN performance very bad with 10.0-RC5

2014-01-17 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > So does it still pause with traffic? > Yes, it does. > > Have you disabled bgscan? > Just did so. After the issues I had in the past with bgscan, I should have done it already. I'll know by tomorrow whether it made a difference.

Re: IWN performance very bad with 10.0-RC5

2014-01-17 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, So does it still pause with traffic? Have you disabled bgscan? -a On 15 January 2014 18:04, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Sorry, It's been a little busy the past couple of days. > > No, I have had only one interface losing association and not recovering > since my first report. That one did no

Re: IWN performance very bad with 10.0-RC5

2014-01-15 Thread Kevin Oberman
Sorry, It's been a little busy the past couple of days. No, I have had only one interface losing association and not recovering since my first report. That one did not occur in conjunction with one of the crypto events. Those seem to interrupt the network for about half a second.Then it restores.

Re: IWN performance very bad with 10.0-RC5

2014-01-12 Thread Kevin Lo
On 2014/01/12 14:36, Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:45:59 -0800 Adrian Chadd wrote: Please help dig up which change broke it. Even just test out the head iwn code from 6 months ago. I came to a very strange result. I have iwn in the kernel since June 2012 using 10. I also

Re: IWN performance very bad with 10.0-RC5

2014-01-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, Yup. Is this when things started getting strange? Were they okay before the replay detection kicked in? -a On 12 January 2014 14:45, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Erich Dollansky > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:45:59 -0800 >> Adrian Chadd wrote:

Re: IWN performance very bad with 10.0-RC5

2014-01-12 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Erich Dollansky < erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:45:59 -0800 > Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > Please help dig up which change broke it. Even just test out the head > > iwn code from 6 months ago. > > I came to a very strange resul

Re: IWN performance very bad with 10.0-RC5

2014-01-11 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:45:59 -0800 Adrian Chadd wrote: > Please help dig up which change broke it. Even just test out the head > iwn code from 6 months ago. I came to a very strange result. I have iwn in the kernel since June 2012 using 10. I also have had run in the kernel of another machi

Re: IWN performance very bad with 10.0-RC5

2014-01-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
The iwnfw module. It has paths into share for the firmware images. On Jan 11, 2014 3:48 AM, "Erich Dollansky" wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:45:59 -0800 > Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > Please help dig up which change broke it. Even just test out the head > > iwn code from 6 months ago. > >

Re: IWN performance very bad with 10.0-RC5

2014-01-11 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:45:59 -0800 Adrian Chadd wrote: > Please help dig up which change broke it. Even just test out the head > iwn code from 6 months ago. I will try. One other question. Where do I find the firmware? Erich > > Adrian > On Jan 11, 2014 12:36 AM, "Erich Dollansky" > wr

Re: IWN performance very bad with 10.0-RC5

2014-01-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, Please help dig up which change broke it. Even just test out the head iwn code from 6 months ago. Adrian On Jan 11, 2014 12:36 AM, "Erich Dollansky" wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:24:46 -0800 > Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > diff the drivers between 9.x and 10.x; not much has changed.

Re: IWN performance very bad with 10.0-RC5

2014-01-10 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:24:46 -0800 Adrian Chadd wrote: > diff the drivers between 9.x and 10.x; not much has changed. > > Try running the 9.x sys/dev/iwn in 10.x, and make sure you use the 9.x > firmware. see if that fixes it. > it was working on 10 until at least summer/fall of last year.

Re: IWN performance very bad with 10.0-RC5

2014-01-10 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, diff the drivers between 9.x and 10.x; not much has changed. Try running the 9.x sys/dev/iwn in 10.x, and make sure you use the 9.x firmware. see if that fixes it. -a On 10 January 2014 21:23, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:02:36 -0800 > Kevin Oberman wrote: > >

Re: IWN performance very bad with 10.0-RC5

2014-01-10 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:02:36 -0800 Kevin Oberman wrote: > Since upgrading my system to 10.0-RC# and now 10.0-RC5, by wireless > performance has severely degraded. > > iwn0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x028000 card=0x13118086 chip=0x00858086 > rev=0x34 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation

IWN performance very bad with 10.0-RC5

2014-01-10 Thread Kevin Oberman
Since upgrading my system to 10.0-RC# and now 10.0-RC5, by wireless performance has severely degraded. iwn0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x028000 card=0x13118086 chip=0x00858086 rev=0x34 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Centrino Advanced-N 6205 [Taylor Peak]' class