Sorry, It's been a little busy the past couple of days.

No, I have had only one interface losing association and not recovering
since my first report. That one did not occur in conjunction with one of
the crypto events. Those seem to interrupt the network for about half a
second.Then it restores. Those issues still seem to crop up periodically,
about twice a day. I suspect that they me be linked to volumeof network
traffic , butI cannot be sure at this point.

Here is the log during the failure yesterday:
Jan 14 23:13:27 rogue kernel: wlan0: _ieee80211_crypto_delkey: AES-CCM
keyix 0 flags 0x133 rsc 0 tsc 379793 len 16
Jan 14 23:13:27 rogue kernel: wlan0: link state changed to DOWN
Jan 14 23:13:27 rogue wpa_supplicant[2669]: wlan0: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED
bssid=00:26:b8:67:c3:2d reason=0
Jan 14 23:13:27 rogue kernel: wlan0: _ieee80211_crypto_delkey: NONE keyix
65535 flags 0x3 rsc 0 tsc 0 len 0
Jan 14 23:13:27 rogue kernel: wlan0: _ieee80211_crypto_delkey: AES-CCM
keyix 1 flags 0x136 rsc 411 tsc 0 len 16
Jan 14 23:13:27 rogue kernel: wlan0: _ieee80211_crypto_delkey: AES-CCM
keyix 2 flags 0x136 rsc 3344 tsc 0 len 16
Jan 14 23:13:27 rogue kernel: wlan0: _ieee80211_crypto_delkey: NONE keyix
65535 flags 0x3 rsc 0 tsc 0 len 0
Jan 14 23:13:29 rogue ntpd[1291]: sendto(199.7.177.206) (fd=25): Network is
down
Jan 14 23:14:22 rogue dhclient[2755]: My address (192.168.1.5) was deleted,
dhclient exiting
Jan 14 23:14:22 rogue wpa_supplicant[2669]: ioctl[SIOCS80211, op=26, val=0,
arg_len=0]: Operation not supported
Jan 14 23:14:22 rogue wpa_supplicant[2669]: wlan0: CTRL-EVENT-TERMINATING
Jan 14 23:14:23 rogue wpa_supplicant[3162]: Successfully initialized
wpa_supplicant
Jan 14 23:14:23 rogue kernel: wlan0: _ieee80211_crypto_delkey: NONE keyix
65535 flags 0x3 rsc 0 tsc 0 len 0
Jan 14 23:14:23 rogue kernel: wlan0: _ieee80211_crypto_delkey: NONE keyix
65535 flags 0x3 rsc 0 tsc 0 len 0
Jan 14 23:14:23 rogue last message repeated 3 times
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue wpa_supplicant[3163]: wlan0: Trying to associate with
00:26:b8:67:c3:2d (SSID='babcom' freq=2437 MHz)
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue wpa_supplicant[3163]: wlan0: Associated with
00:26:b8:67:c3:2d
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue devd: Executing '/etc/rc.d/dhclient quietstart wlan0'
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue wpa_supplicant[3163]: wlan0: WPA: Key negotiation
completed with 00:26:b8:67:c3:2d [PTK=CCMP GTK=CCMP]
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue kernel: wlan0: ieee80211_crypto_newkey: cipher 3
flags 0x3 keyix 65535
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue kernel: wlan0: ieee80211_crypto_newkey: no h/w
support for cipher AES-CCM, falling back to s/w
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue kernel: wlan0: ieee80211_crypto_setkey: AES-CCM keyix
0 flags 0x133 mac 00:26:b8:67:c3:2d rsc 0 tsc 0 len 16
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue kernel: wlan0: ieee80211_crypto_newkey: cipher 3
flags 0x6 keyix 1
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue kernel: wlan0: ieee80211_crypto_newkey: no h/w
support for cipher AES-CCM, falling back to s/w
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue kernel: wlan0: ieee80211_crypto_setkey: AES-CCM keyix
1 flags 0x136 mac ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff rsc 454 tsc 0 len 16
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue wpa_supplicant[3163]: wlan0: CTRL-EVENT-CONNECTED -
Connection to 00:26:b8:67:c3:2d completed [id=1 id_str=]
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue dhclient: New IP Address (wlan0): 192.168.1.5
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue dhclient: New Subnet Mask (wlan0): 255.255.255.0
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue dhclient: New Broadcast Address (wlan0): 192.168.1.255
Jan 14 23:14:24 rogue dhclient: New Routers (wlan0): 192.168.1.1

I have found a problem with my AP configuration that was the cause of the
performance issue, so that is not related to FreeBSD and is now fixed.

Thanks,
Kevin

On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Yup. Is this when things started getting strange? Were they okay
> before the replay detection kicked in?
>
>
> -a
>
> On 12 January 2014 14:45, Kevin Oberman <rkober...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Erich Dollansky
> > <erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:45:59 -0800
> >> Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Please help dig up which change broke it. Even just test out the head
> >> > iwn code from 6 months ago.
> >>
> >> I came to a very strange result. I have iwn in the kernel since June
> >> 2012 using 10. I also have had run in the kernel of another machine
> >> since February 2011. I could not even add runfw to the kernel those
> >> days running some 8 stable. I kept it that way until now.
> >>
> >> run was always working. iwn gave problems starting between August and
> >> November of last year on my access point but still worked on other
> >> places. I used iwn to connect successfully to another wireless network
> >> mid November 2013.
> >>
> >> After adding the firmware to the kernel for both iwn and run, I could
> >> compile the kernel and iwn started to work. runfw did not break
> >> compilation.
> >>
> >> I wonder now if the iwn or run could even work without firmware or if
> >> the firmware was automatically loaded even when iwn or run where
> >> compiled into the kernel.
> >>
> >> Erich
> >
> >
> > Some things look odd here. I had been running with crypto debug for
> about 15
> > hours when I captured the attached log. The things tha looks odd to me
> are
> > two series of "AES-CCM replay detected" errors.
> > Jan 12 00:54:03 rogue kernel: wlan0: [00:26:b8:67:c3:2d] AES-CCM replay
> > detected tid 16 <rsc 1165, csc 1207, keyix 2 rxkeyix 65535>
> > [rsc inc. by one 41 times until rsc = csc]
> > Jan 12 00:54:03 rogue kernel: wlan0: [00:26:b8:67:c3:2d] AES-CCM replay
> > detected tid 16 <rsc 1206, csc 1207, keyix 2 rxkeyix 65535>
> >
> > One VERY odd thing is the MAC address. It is one byte from being the
> address
> > of my Verizon/ActionTec wireless router. It is the only device on my
> network
> > that has an OID of 00:26:b8, but the last nibble is 28 while these errors
> > claim a MAC ending in 2d.
> >
> > The setkey statements with a MAC of FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF also look odd to
> be,
> > but I am pretty clueless about the meaning of most of the message, do it
> > might be fine, but looks strange.
> >
> > During this time I have not had the network  completely hang and require
> an
> > interface restart.
> >
> > Does this provide anything useful?
> >
> > --
> > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
> > E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
>



-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to