Oh, god damnit!
On 12 August 2013 19:41, Julio Merino wrote:
> On 2013-08-11 23:19 , Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Try this patch in sys/dev/bwi/ :
>
> This is what I got:
>
> bwi_mac_set_ackrates: i=0 (of 12); rs->rs_rates = 130
Oh hm, the problem is that rs_rates[] shouldn't be directly used anymore.
On 2013-08-11 23:19 , Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Try this patch in sys/dev/bwi/ :
This is what I got:
bwi_mac_set_ackrates: i=0 (of 12); rs->rs_rates = 130
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wirele
Ugh, I missed another m_nextpkt = NULL assignment.
Try updating again.
Thanks!
-adrian
On 12 August 2013 14:35, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Adrian.
> You wrote 12 августа 2013 г., 21:47:46:
>
>>> AC> Hm. OK.
>>> AC> What I want is the code path _in_ that's queuing a frame via
>>> AC> ie
Hello, Adrian.
You wrote 12 августа 2013 г., 21:47:46:
>> AC> Hm. OK.
>> AC> What I want is the code path _in_ that's queuing a frame via
>> AC> ieee80211_vap_transmit() with m_nextpkt set to NON-NULL.
>> I could set breakpoint on "printf()" from patch and get backtrace when it
>> will be hit. I
I have a lot of the NICs now. I may even test with the 1000 series NICs. :p
-adrian
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@f
> -Message d'origine-
> De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
> de Adrian Chadd
> Envoyé : lundi 12 août 2013 20:25
> À : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
>
> Ok, so this PAN support is .. pretty terrifying
Ok, so this PAN support is .. pretty terrifying. We'll have to tidy it
up once the rest of this work is debugged.
I guess '_u1' here is 'PAN VAP'. We'll eventually rename this stuff
and maybe shift it into a separate source file so all the PAN stuff
clearly lives elsewhere.
I wonder which NICs su
On 12 August 2013 10:41, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> But again, as current version is not stable in normal operation, I haven't
> test it further.
>
> What could be interest of this ?
> Wifi relay, bridge or whatever usage of 2 wireless but only with 1 card.
It's likely for STA on one VAP and P2P-GO o
On 12 August 2013 10:41, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Adrian.
> You wrote 12 августа 2013 г., 21:34:04:
>
> AC> Hm. OK.
> AC> What I want is the code path _in_ that's queuing a frame via
> AC> ieee80211_vap_transmit() with m_nextpkt set to NON-NULL.
> I could set breakpoint on "printf()" from
> De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
> de Adrian Chadd
> Envoyé : lundi 12 août 2013 19:31
> À : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
>
> How do you create the second VAP, and what's it for?
>
#ifconfig wlan1 create
Hello, Adrian.
You wrote 12 августа 2013 г., 21:34:04:
AC> Hm. OK.
AC> What I want is the code path _in_ that's queuing a frame via
AC> ieee80211_vap_transmit() with m_nextpkt set to NON-NULL.
I could set breakpoint on "printf()" from patch and get backtrace when it
will be hit. Is it enough?
-
Hm. OK.
What I want is the code path _in_ that's queuing a frame via
ieee80211_vap_transmit() with m_nextpkt set to NON-NULL.
-adrian
On 12 August 2013 10:32, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Adrian.
> You wrote 12 августа 2013 г., 21:29:08:
>
> AC> So the if_transmit() change did change a few
Hello, Adrian.
You wrote 12 августа 2013 г., 21:29:08:
AC> So the if_transmit() change did change a few things. if_start() /
AC> *_ENQUEUE() clears m_nextpkt().
AC> I'd like to know where m_nextpkt() is NOT being cleared.
AC> How about triggering it quickly - put in a panic there rather than
AC>
How do you create the second VAP, and what's it for?
-adrian
On 12 August 2013 10:26, Cedric GROSS wrote:
>
>> De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
>> de Adrian Chadd
>> Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2013 19:09
>> À : Cedric GROSS
>> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.
Hi,
So the if_transmit() change did change a few things. if_start() /
*_ENQUEUE() clears m_nextpkt().
I'd like to know where m_nextpkt() is NOT being cleared.
How about triggering it quickly - put in a panic there rather than
NULL'ing it, then when it immediately panics, do a backtrace?
-adri
> De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
> de Adrian Chadd
> Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2013 19:09
> À : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
>
> On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS wrote:
>
> > U1 stand for unit 1.
Hello, Freebsd-wireless.
r254238 with ath used as AP panics in fragment processing. This patch from
adrian:
Index: ieee80211_output.c
===
--- ieee80211_output.c (revision 254224)
+++ ieee80211_output.c (working copy)
@@ -458,6 +4
wifi guys,
It would seem that, samsung android devices somehow upset ath(4)
this ath device is operating in hostap mode, the laptops with ath
devices have no issues
root@Border:~ # uname -a
FreeBSD Border 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #4 r254222: Sun Aug
11 16:31:57 UTC 2013 root@Borde
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
19 matches
Mail list logo