Jason Fines wrote:
Hello all,
I've got a question about setting the sysctl variable
net.inet.tcp.reass.maxsegments to a non-zero value inside my vimages. I'm
currently running the FreeBSD 7 with the VIMAGE package available at
http://imunes.tel.fer.hr/virtnet/vimage_7-20081015.tgz.
My problem
Marko,
I'm following along using p4 and the diff script. It looks good..
If it all seems to be working we should commit what you have
and then we should get Kris and Robert to try some of their
benchmarks.. to confirm the numbers you saw earlier.
Kris, the change that is upcoming for the next
Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
Some of you may find this an interesting read:
Crossbow - Network Virtualization Architecture Comes to Life
[http://blogs.sun.com/sunay/entry/crossbow_network_virtualization_architecture_comes]
Interesting reading..
This is the equivalent of a combination of a numb
Bruce Simpson wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
virtualisation of netisr at teh moment is still in flux a bit.
the netisr thread (that's all it really is) becomes associated with
a particular vimage as required. (but hey... read the code.. :-)
http://perforce.freebsd.org/fileLogView.cgi
anyone who has commands and args for their favourite
thing the'd like me to test... send it in..
so far using ttcp I have seem no measureable difference.
but I have more tests to do of course..
for example throughput with small packets with ttcp (KB/Sec)
x VIMAGE_GLOBALS
+ NO_VIMAGE_GLO
Julian Elischer wrote:
anyone who has commands and args for their favourite
thing the'd like me to test... send it in..
so far using ttcp I have seem no measureable difference.
but I have more tests to do of course..
for example throughput with small packets with ttcp (KB/Sec)...
Julian Elischer wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
anyone who has commands and args for their favourite
thing the'd like me to test... send it in..
so far using ttcp I have seem no measureable difference.
but I have more tests to do of course..
for example throughput with small packets
Ragnar Lonn wrote:
Hi all,
I am a longtime (well, since 2004 or so) vimage user. It's really nice
to see this great stuff getting into the main branch!
I have a quick question for the list: I want to be able to have a
machine handle a *lot* of open network connections. Many systems have
var
I've been doing performance testing on the 'non-vimage' 'structified'
case VS the original 'globals' case and have not been able to see any
really significant differences (though I have seen very slight
differences in the distribution of results).
SO I think we are in the position of moving forwa
Julian Elischer wrote:
I've been doing performance testing on the 'non-vimage' 'structified'
case VS the original 'globals' case and have not been able to see any
really significant differences (though I have seen very slight
differences in the distribution of
subbsd wrote:
Hello maillist
i fetch and apply latest http://imunes.tel.fer.hr/virtnet/vimage-20081015.tgz
patches for 7.2 i386 for testing vimage.
All according man page work done.
Small bug: vimage -i with 1 arguments make core dumped:
# vimage -i onearg
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Peter Cornelius wrote:
Hi,
Are vimage and jail mutually exclusive?
no
The situation is that right now jail and vimage are
orthogonal (ish) however in the future,
vimage will become a set of options on jail.
Regards,
Peter.
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15
Olivier SMEDTS wrote:
2009/5/2 Julian Elischer :
The VIMAGE code is nearly all in the the kernel.
One is now able to make VIMAGE kernels (add options VIMAGE)
though they don't actually allow you to make multiple
vimages instances yet..
The VIMAGE option enables all the low level ch
Olivier SMEDTS wrote:
2009/5/2 Julian Elischer :
can you just put #ifdef INVARIANTS around that line and do the compile
again?
It now compiles without errors.
yeah my svn machine went back to Cisco when I left there, so I
don't have an svn tree at the moment. otherwise I'd
Peter Cornelius wrote:
Re...
The situation is that right now jail and vimage are
orthogonal (ish) however in the future,
vimage will become a set of options on jail.
Ah. SO it probably is kinda useless to try and stick a couple of jails 'inside'
a vimage.
no you will be able to nest jails.
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Peter Cornelius wrote:
Re...
The situation is that right now jail and vimage are
orthogonal (ish) however in the future,
vimage will become a set of options on jail.
Ah. SO it probably is kinda useless to try and stick a couple of
jails
Jamie Gritton wrote:
Here's the first round of hierarchical jails under the new framework.
Instead of creds having either a prison or a NULL pointer, they all have
a prison pointer with the default being the global "prison0" that
contains information about the real environment. Jailed root may
Marko Zec wrote:
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=161987
Change 161987 by z...@zec_tpx32 on 2009/05/12 18:47:49
Back out O(n**2) ad-hoc hack for searching for available
ifunits in cloning ifnets, and restore the standard O(n)
bitmapped searching / ifunit allocation
Jamie Gritton wrote:
There's still a change to offer your input on the new jails before they
go in! OK, given the lack of response so far, it's less "still a
chance" than "please?". Current plans are to have this in place for
8.0, with connections to the ongoing Vimage work. Hopefully the sile
Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:12:50AM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote:
There's still a change to offer your input on the new jails before they
go in! OK, given the lack of response so far, it's less "still a
chance" than "please?". Current plans are to have this in place for
8.0
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2009, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
Hi,
I've tried to compile a new kernel once again after updating src, this
time it bombs out during the build process.
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/6164/img1064.jpg
yes, we are aware of that one and the patch is easy a
John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 1:11:55 pm Julian Elischer wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday 18 May 2009 6:34:44 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Author: bz
Date: Mon May 18 22:34:44 2009
New Revision: 192351
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/192351
Log:
Revert the logical
Marko Zec wrote:
On Monday 25 May 2009 15:06:27 Milan Obuch wrote:
Hi,
there is some bug in (most probably) netgraph code. I did fresh csup and
rebuild today. Whenever I try to turn bluetooth on (equivalent to plugging
in the dongle), panic occurs:
ubt0: on usbus3
panic:
in /usr/src/sys/module
V S P wrote:
Hi,
new to the list
came across of
http://www.kerrighed.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
Which a linux-based system that virtualizes individual machines
into one cohesive OS so 4 machines with 4GB and 2 cpus each
look to applications as one machine with 16GB and 8CPUs
certainly looks
V S P wrote:
Hi,
new to the list
came across of
http://www.kerrighed.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
Which a linux-based system that virtualizes individual machines
into one cohesive OS so 4 machines with 4GB and 2 cpus each
look to applications as one machine with 16GB and 8CPUs
I think that th
it's not Vimage vs Jails
but
Vimage as part of Jails.
Peter Cornelius wrote:
Hi there,
I just see the vimage changes going into RELENG_8 and I now am
getting my hands dirty, finally. So thanks to all involved.
Just to get my head around this the right way, I understand that
there is no plan t
Pierre Guinoiseau wrote:
Hi,
Julian Elischer wrote:
it's not Vimage vs Jails
but
Vimage as part of Jails.
Peter Cornelius wrote:
Hi there,
I just see the vimage changes going into RELENG_8 and I now am
getting my hands dirty, finally. So thanks to all involved.
Just to get my head a
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Hello,
It seems that there is no checking for name collisions,
when an interface is claimed from a child vnet.
create ngeth0
lab# ngctl mkpeer eiface ether ether
create test jail
lab# jail -c persist vnet name=test
create nge...@test
lab# jexec test ngctl mkpeer e
I've been running the folllowing set of diffs as a proof of
concept change for a couple of months now. The diff is to cache
the vnet address fixup constant in the pcpu area.
This means that the address of V_xxx is now (%fs:pcpu_offset)+symbol (*)
the cost in the machine dependent part of the sc
here is a patch that effectively make pfil a per-vnet feature, this is
needed because some features (notibly ipfw) are enabled and disabled
by connecting and disconnecing from the network stack using pfil.
Index: netinet/raw_ip.c
===
Tom Judge wrote:
Adam Vande More wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Tom Judge <mailto:t...@tomjudge.com>> wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know of a patch that will add per jail memory
limits so th
remodeler wrote:
I am having the same problem as Nikos I am trying to implement a vnet-enabled
service jail on FreeBSD 8.0 HEAD. I have thoroughly studied the "Network stack
virtualization" document written by Marko. I received troubleshooting help
over several days last from Julia
remodeler wrote:
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:37:49 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote
please recap with a script that fails
Thank you for your response Julian. I very much respect the work everyone has
done on netgraph / vimage / jails, and also the help extended to me.
Kernel options in addition to
remodeler wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
so does this mean it's all working for you?
Yes. Thank you.
Will netgraph let you create a gif or other tunneling socket and plug it in
directly to the graph? Would the alternative be piping a userland tunneling
socket and ng_socket?
there
Ahrenholz, Jeffrey M wrote:
Will netgraph let you create a gif or other tunneling
socket and plug
it in directly to the graph? Would the alternative be piping a
userland tunneling socket and ng_socket?
there is an ng_gif node but I've never used it.
look in /usr/src/sys/netgraph to see what e
I guess we need to make a quick note for inclusion with the 8.0
release notes:
I'm going to put a coupel of sentences here as straw-man starting
point, and hopefully we can work on it together.
In addition some recipes for some interesting things to do might be
good. Maybe as a separate doc
remodeler wrote:
Hi,
i have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 RC2 and wanted to play around
with imunes/vimage, but i couldn't find it in the installed version
(from DVD ISO). Did i just missed something, or what do i have to
install something in addition? If so, FTP URLS would be helpful as my
BSD ma
Huth, Hans-Peter wrote:
Hi,
i have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 RC2 and wanted to play around
with imunes/vimage, but i couldn't find it in the installed version
(from DVD ISO). Did i just missed something, or what do i have to
install something in addition? If so, FTP URLS would be helpful as m
Justin Wong wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently running a snapshot of the vimage source
(vimage_7_20090505.tgz) against FreeBSD 7.1 on a Soekris Net5501-70. I am
running a small load on the Soekris board and periodically I will receive
the following error:
--
Fatal trap 12: page fault while
Justin Wong wrote:
I am having trouble getting ppp to work within vimages. Without vimages, my
box is able to connect (via vr0 interface) and assign it to tun0. With
vimages, I assign vr0 to it (continuing with the name vr0 instead of eth0)
and ppp cannot detect it therefore I am unable to requ
Justin Wong wrote:
I am having trouble getting ppp to work within vimages. Without vimages,
my
box is able to connect (via vr0 interface) and assign it to tun0. With
Which version of FreeBSD are you using?
FreeBSD 8.0 RC3. I upgraded it after experiencing some kernel panics with
7.1 (T
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
possibly. but try running 'ngctl list' in the jail to list all the
nodes it can see there.
as well as ifconfig
there might be an order dependency:
try this:
reboot with no netgraph nodes loaded.
make the jail
move vr0 to teh
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
we would expect it to work the way you wish but it appears that we
have left that out in oversight.
We'll see what we can do..
(remember in 8.0 vimage is just s technology review feature and you
should not be trying to use it in produ
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
we would expect it to work the way you wish but it appears that we
have left that out in oversight.
We'll see what we can do..
(remember in 8.0 vimage is just s technology review feature and you
should not be trying to use it in produ
Justin Wong wrote:
That did it! Thanks.
great!
When I get time I'll look at making the netgraph nodes move with the
interface.
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
To
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
wrote:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Reinhard Haller wrote:
Hi,
I'm searching for a way to create vnet jails in rc.conf. I tried it with
jail_flags (-c vnet) with no success.
The documentation is not very helpful, I'm missing the w
Reinhard Haller wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb schrieb:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Reinhard Haller wrote:
Hi,
I'm searching for a way to create vnet jails in rc.conf. I tried it with
jail_flags (-c vnet) with no success.
The documentation is not very helpful, I'm missing the way to create the
vnet jail and
Julian Elischer wrote:
Reinhard Haller wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb schrieb:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Reinhard Haller wrote:
Hi,
I'm searching for a way to create vnet jails in rc.conf. I tried it
with
jail_flags (-c vnet) with no success.
The documentation is not very helpful, I'm missing
Reinhard Haller wrote:
Julian Elischer schrieb:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Reinhard Haller wrote:
I tried it with the following, but suffered intermittent routing
problems (route6d died and cannot be restarted):
jail -c vnet name=d1 host.hostname=dns1.intern.de path=/jails/dns1
persist
Reinhard Haller wrote:
Julian Elischer schrieb:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Reinhard Haller wrote:
I tried it with the following, but suffered intermittent routing
problems (route6d died and cannot be restarted):
jail -c vnet name=d1 host.hostname=dns1.intern.de path=/jails/dns1
persist
Venture37 wrote:
The following reply was made to PR kern/141696; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Venture37
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ventur...@geeklan.co.uk
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/141696: [rum] [panic] rum(4)+ vimage = kernel panic
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:25:28 +
Photo of the tr
Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
Hi Guys
Another PR, this time with a xen/hvm virtual machine running FreeBSD 8/i386
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=141848&cat=kern
looking at the images (below, for others)
http://img691.imageshack.us/i/screenshot20091221at171.png/
http://img709.imageshac
Huth, Hans-Peter wrote:
Dear all,
this is probably a beginners question:
For my script to set up an emulation using vimage and netgraph, i tried to give
meaningful names to netgraph nodes. I tried:
ngctl -f foo mkpeer eiface ether ether (ignores the -f , creates ngethX?)
witout looking at th
Tobias Lott wrote:
Good Day to everyone
As subject says FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #10 r202187: Wed Jan 13 18:59:52 CET
2010 panics at boot.
The only difference is, I removed options SCTP and added options VIMAGE.
Either it is re Driver or pfsync in my Kernel, going to try and build a
Kernel without p
Jim Sifferle wrote:
Hi,
I've used ipfw and Dummynet as well as ipfw + DSCP recognition patch and
pf/altq to simulate Internet and MPLS WAN environments for several
years. All of my setups have run under VMWare, which for many reasons
isn't ideal. I would like to collapse all of these VMs into
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi,
Jim Sifferle wrote:
Hi,
I've used ipfw and Dummynet as well as ipfw + DSCP recognition patch and
pf/altq to simulate Internet and MPLS WAN environments for several
years. All of my setups have run under VMWare, whic
Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
Hi,
I would like to setup VirtualBox headless with the VNC-patch and vboxweb
inside a jail. Is this possible? I use FreeBSD 8.0-p2 amd64.
regards
Wolfgang
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
j...@sifferle.net wrote:
On February 23, 2010 at 10:11 AM "Ermal Luçi" wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Julian Elischer
wrote:
>
> > Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>
> >>
On 4/9/10 11:14 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:58:38PM +0200, Anders Hagman wrote:
Hi
When using dummynet inside a vnet node with a simple pipe the kernel
panic on the first packet.
I use 8.0-STABLE cvsuped at 7 Apr 15:28
The ipfw code with dummynet is largely changed and th
On 4/9/10 7:17 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 01:56:31PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/7/10 1:38 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:58:38PM +0200, Anders Hagman wrote:
Note: different To: list
Hi
When using dummynet inside a vnet node with a simple pipe
On 6/10/10 3:07 PM, Fernando Gleiser wrote:
I'm looking for some technical docs about FreeBSD's network stac virt. I saw a
paper from the wiki and little else. The paper seems to focus mostly on the
paralielization of the network stack more than the framework for a virtualized
network.
I want
On 9/9/10 12:22 PM, Luiz Gustavo S. Costa wrote:
Hi Bjoern,
I just perform tests with your patch and it worked very well! thanks
for the patch ...
But I found something that may be unsafe within the jail environment,
I'm allowed to change /dev/pf, so that if I run a "pfctl-f
/etc/pf.conf" insid
On 9/27/10 12:39 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Hello,
I am seeing a kernel panic with VIMAGE and NDIS. My wifi card needs
NDIS
and I need VIMAGE :)
It is easily producible. Associate with an AP, run dhclient and then
change the SSID to something random.
#10 0xc0978200 in rt_dispatch (m=0xc76
On 9/27/10 10:51 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
#10 0xc0978200 in rt_dispatch (m=0xc764ad00, sa=0x0) at
/usr/src/sys/net/rtsock.c:1374
1374if (V_loif)
(kgdb) list
1369}
1370*(unsigned short *)(tag + 1) = sa->sa_fam
On 10/18/10 11:10 AM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
Hello,
the link http://people.freebsd.org/~eri/pf45_1.diff has the patch for
pf(4) as of OpenBSD 4.5 version.
The patch is against HEAD.
After OpenBSD 4.5 the syntax has changed and this is the reason for
such an 'old' version patch.
After importing this
We discussed this at MeetBSD last week and it woudl seem that the next
big hurdle for virtualization would seem to be a good concept to allow
jails to have virtual versions of various virtual devices..
for example
pf has been virtualized (when IS that patch going to get committed?)
but pfsync
On 11/13/10 1:30 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi Julian,
We discussed this at MeetBSD last week and it woudl seem that the next
big hurdle for virtualization would seem to be a good concept to allow
jails to have virtual versions of various virtual
On 11/13/10 1:55 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Was this brought up in any of the discussions?
http://www.7he.at/freebsd/vps/
no it was not brought up..
it was an unofficial non-planned discussion that errupted pretty much
spontaneously an a
On 11/13/10 2:13 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/13/10 1:55 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Julian
Elischer wrote:
Was this brought up in any of the discussions?
http://www.7he.at/freebsd/vps/
no it was not brought up..
it was an unofficial non-planned
On 11/13/10 8:27 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/13/10 2:13 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/13/10 1:55 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Julian
Elischer wrote:
Was this brought up in any of the discussions?
http://www
On 11/14/10 11:43 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:
Julian,
this sort of dovetails into something I've been thinking about for
a while,
which is NUMA support.
really good thoughts, but bad timing and wrong target audience I
think.
I don't
On 12/11/10 4:49 PM, William Phillips wrote:
Hello:
The following script creates a point-to-point link between jails.
I will admit that I don't remember ever actually connecting
two ng_iface nodes directly to each other.
Having said htat there the epair(4) driver which is specifically
desig
On 12/29/10 8:54 AM, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
Hi,
I am running FreeBSD Current 201010 on RouterStation Pro (mips CPU).
I recompiled the kernel with the following options:
options VIMAGE
device epair
options NULLFS
but when I try to load ng_ether I get this error:
lin
On 1/11/11 11:42 AM, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
Hi,
With the attached patch I can mount and use samba fs on current built with
VIMAGE option.
but what does that actually MEAN?
you are in a jail
you have your own stack.
you mount a filesystem.
When someone outside the jail (who can see that point i
On 1/13/11 4:42 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Hi,
Please, review the attached patch. It is against yesterday's HEAD
and it virtualizes if_bridge.
without examining every character, it looks ok.
The script should go in /usr/share/examples/netgraph
Bjoern/Marko, see any problems?
You can
On 1/23/11 6:33 AM, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for cross posting, but this question concerns both VirtualBox and VIMAGE
:-).
I would like to be able to run VirtualBox on my desktop, with kernel compilled
with VIMAGE, so I would use light vnet jails for FreeBSD VMs and VirtualBox
for other
On 1/25/11 1:06 PM, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 23:44:41 -0800 Julian Elischer wrote:
JE> On 1/23/11 6:33 AM, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>> As a quick fix I added in VBoxNetFlt-freebsd.c in all "problem" functions
>> CURVNET_SET_QUIET(vnet0) macro,
On 2/1/11 8:40 AM, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
Hi,
I hope I am on the write place, second try...
I have written a module that loads fake wifi devices (wtap?) and
distributes packets between them. For now I use route command to route
packets between them from upper layers (TCP,...).
I want to tak
On 2/1/11 11:04 AM, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/1/11 8:40 AM, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
Hi,
I hope I am on the write place, second try...
I have written a module that loads fake wifi devices (wtap?) and
distributes packets between
2/ maybe you juaast have to interate through all the vimages.. to do
whatever it is that you do
(that happens in some protocols)
On 2/1/11 11:04 AM, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/1/11 8:40 AM, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
Hi,
I
//depot/projects/vimage/porting_to_vimage.txt&REV=18
use the 'download' button to get a more readable version.
it goes into some of the details of this. especially the
initialization or vimage modules.
I still get a panic...
br,
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
ok
On 2/2/11 8:42 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/2/11 7:06 AM, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
Thanx makes more sense, but I have noticed something weired if you can
shade some light on.
I added printfs one when the module is first loaded (static int
event_handler(module_t module, int event, void
On 2/2/11 9:12 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
Hi,
Thanx makes more sense, but I have noticed something weired if you can
shade some light on.
I added printfs one when the module is first loaded (static int
event_handler(module_t module, int event, voi
ith this hack?
br,
P.S. I have printed "porting to vnet" text to have it always at hand,
but its a bit hard for me... doing my best.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 2/2/11 9:12 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
Hi,
On 2/3/11 2:59 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
I don't understand why you saw a CRED_TO_VNET of 0
I was under the impression that every process/thread in the
system would
be
on vnet0
in a vimage kernel.
This is how my printf looks like:
struct thread
On 2/3/11 11:47 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
I will be at FOSDEM this weekend (if you are as well and want to talk,
send me an email off list or try to find me in the crowds). When back
next week I plan to extract the initial parts from perforce and merge
them to SVN. This will include:
1) vn
On 3/10/11 9:13 PM, Subbsd wrote:
Hi.
i have a server with FreeBSD-current (9) kernel and core system that
runs a dozen JAIL-s - some of them is FreeBSD 8x environment , and
part is surrounded on FreeBSD 7x.
My question - despite on COMPAT_FREEBSD{4-7} in the kernel, utilities
do not use those s
On 6/18/11 3:53 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Is VIMAGE supposed to be compatible with pf? On r223207 (8-stable) I'm getting
a panic when pfctl loads the rules:
no they are not compatible.. there are comatibilty patches but we have
so far failed to get them into the tree.
Fatal trap 12: page fa
On 9/6/11 8:03 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 7 September 2011 09:32, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Stephen Hocking
wrote:
Am wondering if anyone has done drivers the these sorts of network
interfaces that are offered by VMWare& Virtual box. I know that on
some Linux VM
does anyone know what is needed for a hypervisor to support PCI pass
through?
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-virtualizati
On 9/27/11 1:35 PM, Neel Natu wrote:
Hi Julian,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
does anyone know what is needed for a hypervisor to support PCI pass
through?
I can speak about the bhyve implementation of pci passthru but I
suspect that other hypervisors do it
On 8/31/12 4:27 PM, Klaus P. Ohrhallinger wrote:
Hello!
I'm pleased to announce the first feature-complete alpha version
of my virtualization project VPS:
http://www.7he.at/freebsd/vps/
Besides a diff there are also prebuilt binary sets available
that can be easily installed using pkg_add.
I
I have been unable to get NAT mode to work for me.
(bridging seems to work fine)
is it known to be broken or otherwise fussy in freebsd 9.1?
I have it under PCBSD 9.1 and installed the PBI..
other than the problem with NAT mode it seems to be working fine.
but that is a deal breaker for when I
RootBSD virtual hosts are already virtualised (Xen). I doubt you can
run bhyve on Xen.
On 9/9/13 4:47 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
The host:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (2400.06-MHz K8-class
CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x206c2 Family = 0x6 Model = 0x2c
Stepp
If CPUs are mapped around, how are IPIs handled? I assume they must be
emulated?
I've noticed that under Xen (on both Amazon EC2 and a Redhat server)
whenever you schedule a thread it always sits on the run queue for 20
uSecs before it starts running. It looks to me like it's the IPI
taking a
On 9/25/13 11:04 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 25/09/13 16:56, Julian Elischer wrote:
If CPUs are mapped around, how are IPIs handled? I assume they must be
emulated?
I've noticed that under Xen (on both Amazon EC2 and a Redhat server)
whenever you schedule a thread it always sits on th
On 9/26/13 4:16 PM, Peter Grehan wrote:
Hi Julian,
If CPUs are mapped around, how are IPIs handled? I assume they must be
emulated?
For bhyve, if the target vCPU of an IPI is running, a null IPI is
sent on the host to force it to exit so the IPI can be injected
(vmm.c:vm_interrupt_hostcpu(
On 9/26/13 5:50 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 26/09/13 03:48, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 9/25/13 11:04 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 25/09/13 16:56, Julian Elischer wrote:
If CPUs are mapped around, how are IPIs handled? I assume they must be
emulated?
I've noticed that under Xen (on
On 10/11/13 5:59 AM, Dee Nixon wrote:
A few weeks ago we volunteered to add some new material, primarily
about bhyve, to the section on virtualiation in the FreeBSD
handbook. You can see our nearly-final draft (pending any comments
from the list, and pending the repair of VirtualBox so it can w
On 10/11/13 9:56 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 11/10/13 11:42, Eggert, Lars wrote:
Hi,
On May 13, 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Right now the code is in a state where it can be tested by users, so we
would like to encourage FreeBSD and Xen users to test it and provide
feedback.
any
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
