d64
hw.model: AMD A8-6500 APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
hw.ncpu: 4
--
dev.rgephy.0.%location: phyno=1
dev.rgephy.0.%pnpinfo: oui=0xe04c model=0x0 rev=0x0
dev.rgephy.0.%parent: miibus0
[wam@devbox, pre, 8:20:12am] 678 %
--
William A. Mahaffey III
-
On 11/12/15 08:20, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
Howdy, new to this list. I posted this to FreeBSD-users & was advised
to try this list or the GNU GCC list, so here goes:
I pkg-installed amd64-gcc over the weekend hoping for Graphite
(auto-loop parallelization) support, but no g
On 11/14/15 18:36, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 11/12/15 08:20, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
Howdy, new to this list. I posted this to FreeBSD-users & was advised
to try this list or the GNU GCC list, so here goes:
I pkg-installed amd64-gcc over the weekend hoping for Grap
On 11/15/15 13:58, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
I pkg-installed amd64-gcc over the weekend hoping for Graphite
(auto-loop parallelization) support, but no go.
When you say "amd64-gcc" where did you obtain that from? As a
FreeBSD port/p
I have found & apparently isolated what looks like a compiler bug in
(pkg-installed, box-stock) gcc48 under FreeBSD 9.3R, see attached. I
also prepped a tarball w/ the files that produced the problem for me. Do
I post that here or to GNU ? TIA & have a good one
--
W
On 11/17/15 17:56, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi William,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
I have found & apparently isolated what looks like a compiler bug in
(pkg-installed, box-stock) gcc48 under FreeBSD 9.3R, see attached. I
also prepped a tarball w/ the files that prod
up
w/ GNU, so we'll see what happens. Thanks again.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
ever devised by man."
ency generator for makefiles
[wam@devbox, pre, 8:08:53pm] 2848 %
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
ever devi
On 12/01/15 07:35, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
I am using gmake under FreeBSD 9.3R to (try to) maintain some inhouse
mixed language code (ANSI C, some c++, FORTRAN 77). I have a utility
library which I use to hold C & c++ object files, using the 'target::'
syntax. This w
t (I think). Is the pkg built
differently from the port ? TIA & have a good one.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
ever devised by man."
t (I think). Is the pkg built
differently from the port ? TIA & have a good one.
*K* I meant gcc5-devel, sorry :-/
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the
different name
(gcc5X, gcc5d, maybe gcc521(X|d), you get the picture), for convenient
back-to-back comparisons if req'd
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is
other box on
my LAN, Linux, FC14 (soon to be updated to CentOS 6), Intel compiler
suite, FWIW. What do I need to do to get this to link ? TIA & have a
good one.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
&q
On 12/06/15 10:33, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
I am using gcc5-devel to maintain some inhouse mixed-language (C++
main & some lower stuff, *LOTTA* ANSI C, bits of FORTRAN77) program. I
am getting the following link errors trying to link up a fully static
version of the code to us
tatic-linker
options, is that my problem here ? If not, any clues what is :-) ? TIA &
have a good one.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
27;m sure it's pilot error, but I (think I) have iterated all
combinations of (-static)-libgcc, (-static)-libstdc++
(-static)libgfortran & nothing seems to work *Any* clues
appreciated :-/ TIA & have a good o
On 12/09/15 12:03, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 09 Dec 2015, at 17:50, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
I am still trying to statically link my inhouse code. I switched to using g++5
in the link line:
...
g++5 -o /usr/local/bin/PreBFCGL.opteron.TEST.static
-Wl,-s,--allow-multiple-definition
On 12/09/15 12:03, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 09 Dec 2015, at 17:50, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
I am still trying to statically link my inhouse code. I switched to using g++5
in the link line:
...
g++5 -o /usr/local/bin/PreBFCGL.opteron.TEST.static
-Wl,-s,--allow-multiple-definition
o pardon me if this is a bit noobish :-/ TIA & have a good one.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
On 12/10/15 10:35, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
I just did a 'pkg upgrade -y' when I noticed upgraded LibGL available.
I was hoping it might include static versions of libGL/GLU/GLw, but no
such luck. However, pkg did reinstall gcc5-devel-5.2.1.s20151124 due
to changed options.
:04 cloog-isl-config.cmake
/usr/local/lib/isl:
total 5
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 670 Nov 6 00:04 isl-config.cmake
[root@devbox, gcc5-devel, 10:04:44am] 920 %
Why are the port-compiled gcc5-devel & the pkg-installed gcc5 identical ?
How do I get the gcc5-de
On 12/23/15 05:56, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi William,
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
However, pkg did reinstall gcc5-devel-5.2.1.s20151124 due to changed
options. I cd'ed to /usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel & poked around a bit. I
saw no files or directories dated t
, so I thought
I was ready to go. Not a huge issue, but recompiling the compiler shoots
about an hour on my box, would be sweet to avoid that. TIA for any clues
& have a good one.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
of is a silent graphite build
failure that isn't fatal, resulting in a built but incomplete package.
Unlikely all else being equal though
Let us know what you find
./koobs
On 2 Feb 2016 3:06 AM, "William A. Mahaffey III" <mailto:w...@hiwaay.net>> wrote:
I just d
of is a silent graphite build
failure that isn't fatal, resulting in a built but incomplete package.
Unlikely all else being equal though
Let us know what you find
./koobs
On 2 Feb 2016 3:06 AM, "William A. Mahaffey III" <mailto:w...@hiwaay.net>> wrote:
I just d
On 02/01/16 10:40, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 2/02/2016 3:24 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 02/01/16 10:18, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
Hi William,
You may be seeing a previously saved config, try make rmconfig then
check again, or look at OPTIONS_DEFAULT inside Makefile
You're correc
On 02/01/16 10:48, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
If you need further help, freebsd-ports is the most appropriate list,
feel free to reply there:)
./koobs
Very well, I'll move this over there, sorry for the noise & thanks :-)
--
William A. Mah
On 02/01/16 10:53, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 02/01/16 10:48, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
If you need further help, freebsd-ports is the most appropriate list,
feel free to reply there:)
./koobs
Very well, I'll move this over there, sorry for the noise & thanks :-)
Ee
onal that the port & pkg have different support options
(specifically Graphite) ?
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
ever devised by m
On 03/01/16 15:33, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
When I run gcc5 from the CLI or under make as a regular user, it reports no
Graphite support compiled in. When I update the gcc5-devel port, it reports
Graphite enabled:
[root@devbox, gcc5-devel, 10:24
30 matches
Mail list logo
