clang++ 3.3 issue (excessively slow compile vs. gcc 4.6 in just one file of a port)

[Please keep me in Cc:, I am not subscribed.] Greetings, I have recently spent some efforts getting rawtherapee to compile on 10-stable. I think I succeeded, and came across something I find worth investigating. For just one of rawtherapee's files, clang++ 3.3's compile time is excessively long

Re: clang++ 3.3 issue (excessively slow compile vs. gcc 4.6 in just one file of a port)

On 18 Nov 2013, at 22:20, Matthias Andree wrote: > [Please keep me in Cc:, I am not subscribed.] > > Greetings, > > I have recently spent some efforts getting rawtherapee to compile on > 10-stable. I think I succeeded, and came across something I find worth > investigating. > > For just one of

[CFT] Experimental gcc update

Hi; Apparently Google has an enhanced gcc distribution for Android [1] and I found a series of interesting patches there. Most of the patches are backports of patches produced by Google employees and submitted to the FSF. The license hasn't been changed from the GPLv2. While gcc doesn't have

Re: clang++ 3.3 issue (excessively slow compile vs. gcc 4.6 in just one file of a port)

Am 18.11.2013 23:04, schrieb Dimitry Andric: > I will have a look at the port meanwhile, I hope it does not pull in too > many dependencies? Thanks for the prompt response. Trying top-of-clang-tree will take me a few days until I get around to it (is clang-devel good enough for a first attempt?)

Re: clang++ 3.3 issue (excessively slow compile vs. gcc 4.6 in just one file of a port)

On 18 Nov 2013, at 23:25, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 18.11.2013 23:04, schrieb Dimitry Andric: > >> I will have a look at the port meanwhile, I hope it does not pull in too >> many dependencies? > > Thanks for the prompt response. Trying top-of-clang-tree will take me a > few days until I get a

Re: clang++ 3.3 issue (excessively slow compile vs. gcc 4.6 in just one file of a port)

Am 18.11.2013 23:30, schrieb Dimitry Andric: > On 18 Nov 2013, at 23:25, Matthias Andree wrote: >> Am 18.11.2013 23:04, schrieb Dimitry Andric: >> >>> I will have a look at the port meanwhile, I hope it does not pull in too >>> many dependencies? >> >> Thanks for the prompt response. Trying top-of

Re: clang++ 3.3 issue (excessively slow compile vs. gcc 4.6 in just one file of a port)

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:54:00PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > Glib shares the fate, because it defers to std:: containers where possible. > > A nice way would require additional work and get the linkers to complain > that symbols resolve with a different, incompatible ABI. That would, > howev

Re: clang++ 3.3 issue (excessively slow compile vs. gcc 4.6 in just one file of a port)

On 18 Nov 2013, at 23:54, Matthias Andree wrote: ... > Uploaded. http://people.freebsd.org/~mandree/ has: > > : the xzipped .ii > file (unpacked: 6.5 MB) > > : > compiler comm