Am 18.11.2013 23:04, schrieb Dimitry Andric:

> I will have a look at the port meanwhile, I hope it does not pull in too
> many dependencies?

Thanks for the prompt response. Trying top-of-clang-tree will take me a
few days until I get around to it (is clang-devel good enough for a
first attempt?)

Dependencies: gtkmm-2.4 and libcanberra-gtk3.so with their dependencies
will be the pain spots. They pulls in a lot of other GNOME-related
mm-style libraries for C++ adaptation.  If you already have Gtk+2 and 3,
it's likely manageable.



(Oh, and I wish we had more prominent error messages telling about an
ABI mismatch between libc++ and libstdc++ than just the innocuous
undefined references about - roughly -
Glib::ustring::ustring(std::basic_string<> const &) - I needed to nm -sC
the glibmm-2.0.so to figure out it provided the std::_1:: namespace
stuff for c++ and finally figure out the libraries were alright but they
were using the libc++ ABI rather than GCC's libstdc++.)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to