Re: c89 broken on head?

2013-03-08 Thread Warner Losh
On Mar 7, 2013, at 8:07 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 7 March 2013 18:03, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On 2013-03-07 22:36, Warner Losh wrote: >>> On Mar 7, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2013-03-07 21:22, Tijl Coosemans wrote: ... > Because it's the practical thing to do? Ol

Re: c89 broken on head?

2013-03-08 Thread Eitan Adler
On 8 March 2013 12:40, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Mar 7, 2013, at 8:07 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > >> On 7 March 2013 18:03, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>> On 2013-03-07 22:36, Warner Losh wrote: On Mar 7, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2013-03-07 21:22, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >