Hi All,
In 10.0, the plan is not to ship any GPL'd code, so I'd like to start
disconnecting things from the default build, starting with gcc. I've been
running a gcc-free system for a while, and I think all of the ports that don't
build with clang are now explicitly depending on gcc. Does any
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:41:11AM +, David Chisnall wrote:
> I think all of the ports that don't build with clang are now explicitly
> depending on gcc.
Nope. We switched some of the most notorious failures, but hundreds
more remain -- mostly leaf ports.
Without the ability to run -exp buil
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:47:19AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:41:11AM +, David Chisnall wrote:
> > I think all of the ports that don't build with clang are now explicitly
> > depending on gcc.
>
> Nope. We switched some of the most notorious failures, but hundreds
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:41:11AM +, David Chisnall wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In 10.0, the plan is not to ship any GPL'd code, so I'd like to start
> disconnecting things from the default build, starting with gcc. I've been
> running a gcc-free system for a while, and I think all of the ports t
On 25 Jan 2013, at 11:31, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> To clarify: there is no plans to not ship any GPLed code for 10.x.
This is something that has been said on mailing lists, at BSDCan and at
DevSummits in the past, without any objections being raised. If this is no
longer a goal, then that
on 25/01/2013 15:21 David Chisnall said the following:
> This is something that has been said on mailing lists, at BSDCan and at
> DevSummits in the past, without any objections being raised.
A simple test - has there been a core decision that no GPL software must be
shipped with 10.x?
--
Andriy
On 25 Jan 2013, at 14:03, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 25/01/2013 15:21 David Chisnall said the following:
>> This is something that has been said on mailing lists, at BSDCan and at
>> DevSummits in the past, without any objections being raised.
>
> A simple test - has there been a core decision that
on 25/01/2013 16:10 David Chisnall said the following:
> On 25 Jan 2013, at 14:03, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> on 25/01/2013 15:21 David Chisnall said the following:
>>> This is something that has been said on mailing lists, at BSDCan and at
>>> DevSummits in the past, without any objections being r
Hello list,
On behalf of Pete Chou, I would like to ask for review, testing and hopefully
commit help of this revised patch for crunchgen and crunchide which allows
mclinker (http://code.google.com/p/mclinker/) to link the base system. In
short, this patch is needed because crunchide is being o
On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:31 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:41:11AM +, David Chisnall wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In 10.0, the plan is not to ship any GPL'd code, so I'd like to start
>> disconnecting things from the default build, starting with gcc. I've been
>> runn
On Jan 25, 2013, at 7:25 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 25/01/2013 16:10 David Chisnall said the following:
>> On 25 Jan 2013, at 14:03, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>> on 25/01/2013 15:21 David Chisnall said the following:
This is something that has been said on mailing lists, at BSDCan and at
>
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:31:39PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:31 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:41:11AM +, David Chisnall wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> In 10.0, the plan is not to ship any GPL'd code, so I'd like to start
> >> discon
On Jan 25, 2013, at 1:41 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In 10.0, the plan is not to ship any GPL'd code, so I'd like to start
> disconnecting things from the default build, starting with gcc. I've been
> running a gcc-free system for a while, and I think all of the ports that
> don'
On 01/25/2013 14:59, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:31:39PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:31 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:41:11AM +, David Chisnall wrote:
Hi All,
In 10.0, the plan is not to ship any GPL'd code, so I'd
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:36:15PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> On 01/25/2013 14:59, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:31:39PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> >> On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:31 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:41:11AM +, David C
On 01/25/2013 15:44, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
...
I am really tired of the constant struggle against the consumation of
the FreeBSD as the test-bed for the pre-alpha quality software. E.g.,
are we fine with broken C++ runtime in 9 ?
The libstdc++ issue is really REALLY worrying.
I would prefer
On 2013-01-25 21:54, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
...
I am aware a fix is being worked on. I think that as long as
the default compiler/C++ library works it is OK to make things
easier for other compilers. I am OK with having that change in
-current but for 9.x it is simply unacceptable.
Actually, clan
on 25/01/2013 21:35 Warner Losh said the following:
> This has been talked about in a vague way for years.
Warner,
just a nitpick, couldn't resist - sorry, so for years we talked about the magic
10.x release to become GPL-free?
Or was it just a goal for 'some day'?
--
Andriy Gapon
_
On Jan 25, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 25/01/2013 21:35 Warner Losh said the following:
>> This has been talked about in a vague way for years.
>
> Warner,
>
> just a nitpick, couldn't resist - sorry, so for years we talked about the
> magic
> 10.x release to become GPL-free?
>
On 01/25/2013 16:51, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2013-01-25 21:54, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
...
I am aware a fix is being worked on. I think that as long as
the default compiler/C++ library works it is OK to make things
easier for other compilers. I am OK with having that change in
-current but for 9.x
Hi, list,
This patch helps not only MCLinker but also the Google gold linker to link
the base system.
GNU ld, Google gold and MCLinker are designed for different purposes and
have different market spectrum.
Letting different groups adopt different linkers for their own needs can
cater BSD to vari
21 matches
Mail list logo