On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:47:19AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 08:41:11AM +0000, David Chisnall wrote: > > I think all of the ports that don't build with clang are now explicitly > > depending on gcc. > > Nope. We switched some of the most notorious failures, but hundreds > more remain -- mostly leaf ports. > > Without the ability to run -exp builds, which I do not currently have, > this is extremely premature.
I also think this is a bit premature, ports is one issue, second one is that other major archs are still with gcc. Developers should be able to fix sources broken on non-clang archs easily. Once arm/mips/ppc are switched (fingers crossed that it's going to be soon) disabling gcc by default should be easier. Roman _______________________________________________ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
