On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:15:14PM +0200, Christoph Schug wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007, steve wrote:
>
> > Howdy!
> >
> > I had this issue on 4.x, which is basically, I have
> > machines that do cgi stuff for customers, and there is a local
> > md device
I have upgraded to 6.2, the problem has
recurred, but the previous patch is no longer valid. Is
there something wrong with the patch/solution given, and
is there a solution for 6.2?
thanx - steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
common, and, definitely a problem for a stable release named 5.4.
Steve
www.powersystemsdirect.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
t 100%. An occasional error (we get watchdog timeouts on network)
is not bad as long as it doesn't destroy the FS, obviously, we want
zero, but, things happen. It's quite conceivable that 1 error per day IS
a hardware issue. But, in our case, with 4 machines and the corruption,
n
dy, please post. (for the patch)
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
the VT8237 VT6410 SATA Raid Controller (not using raid) found on
the asus a7v880 MB.
So, count me in as saying the new ata mkiii patch is great! Looking
forward to it even going into 5.5 if possible.
Steve
Robert Watson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Steve wrote:
I've found tons of e
I have both of them and will say this much
3ware 9xxx series is much better than adaptec,
Adaptec will not work with dbsd without some tweaking, 3ware will work
flawlessly.
--
Steve Rieger
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles
both
--
Steve Rieger
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Sprickman
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 1:26 PM
To: Steve
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Serial ATA RAID Controllers (5.x)
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Steve wrote:
> 3w
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 11:00:01 -0700 (MST)
Warren Block wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>
> > Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
> >
> >> I have a USB Drive that was working fine under 7.3, but since
> >> updating to 8.1 no longer has the correct /dev entries. Under
> >> 7.3 it was
ther USB craziness with ehci(4) ports or otherwise Intel PCH
controllers?Any fellow Optiplex 980 users? I'd be more than happy
to provide pciconf or other output if requested.
Thanks,
Steve Polyack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On 01/19/11 08:48, Steve Polyack wrote:
On 1/18/2011 5:56 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:40:13PM -0500, Steve Polyack wrote:
We've recently upgraded a few desktop workstations from Dell
Optiplex 960s to Optiplex 980s. We were running FreeBSD
8.1-RELEASE. The migr
On 1/18/2011 5:56 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:40:13PM -0500, Steve Polyack wrote:
We've recently upgraded a few desktop workstations from Dell
Optiplex 960s to Optiplex 980s. We were running FreeBSD
8.1-RELEASE. The migration was performed by simply swappin
On 01/19/11 08:48, Steve Polyack wrote:
On 1/18/2011 5:56 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:40:13PM -0500, Steve Polyack wrote:
We've recently upgraded a few desktop workstations from Dell
Optiplex 960s to Optiplex 980s. We were running FreeBSD
8.1-RELEASE. The migr
share/doc?
> >
>
> I personally have never used vgrind, but since it's available as part of
> /usr/ports/textproc/heirloom-doctools IMO it would be safe to remove it
> from base, maybe with a note in UPDATING.
AFAICT, heirloom-doctools does not work on 64-bit platforms.
vgrin
Is anyone aware of some sort of facility in either FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE
or the em(4) driver which would cause it to cache MAC addresses / ARP
entries for hosts on a per-protocol basis? We've been doing some
testing with new routers, and almost every time we switch them in or out
our FreeBSD mac
On 03/15/11 14:26, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:30:39AM -0400, Steve Polyack wrote:
Is anyone aware of some sort of facility in either FreeBSD
8.1-RELEASE or the em(4) driver which would cause it to cache MAC
addresses / ARP entries for hosts on a per-protocol basis
On 03/15/11 14:26, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:30:39AM -0400, Steve Polyack wrote:
Is anyone aware of some sort of facility in either FreeBSD
8.1-RELEASE or the em(4) driver which would cause it to cache MAC
addresses / ARP entries for hosts on a per-protocol basis
On 03/17/11 10:25, Gua Chung Lim wrote:
Hi all,
I have been using FBSD since mid 2005 without any problems.
Recently, I installed 8.2R from DVD on my new machine.
(HP Pavilion p6276l Home PC)
FBSD 8.2R does not probe my sound card.
# kldload snd_driver
ppc0: parallel port not found.
ppc0: paral
h IP alias on a CARP interface, then I think that would explain what
you are seeing - and also possibly give you a workaround by adding two
more bogus IPs on your primary datacenter firewalls (where IPs W and Z
are normally missing).
- Steve
___
freebs
On 06/14/2011 04:51 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 14 Jun 2011, at 19:33, Steve Polyack wrote:
On 06/14/2011 01:00 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I can confirm that this scenario causes problems, see below:
### ON FIREWALL 1 , carp master for carp0, carp1, carp2
carp2: flags=49 metric 0 mtu
On 09/21/2011 01:34 PM, Mike Andrews wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Pete French wrote:
Does it specifically have to be a vlan(4), or can you perhaps add
another
address to lo(4), or perhaps create a "lo1" in addition to the "lo0"?
It can be anything really - I was looking for a "generic" interf
ve a dedicated team of
professionals who work around the clock to be available to your
every need and only to happy to help you get started.
Here's To Your Success,
Steve Garcia
Ownage Affilite Team Manager
Best
ause a severe increase in turn
around time when doing already long computations. If
you have an MPI application, simply launching greater
than ncpu+1 jobs can show the problem.
PS: search the list archives for "kargl and ULE".
--
Steve
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 04:18:35PM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 15:51, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >This comes up every 9 months or so, and must be approaching FAQ
> >status. In a HPC environment, I recommend 4BSD. Depending on the
> >workload, ULE can cause a severe in
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:03:30PM -0600, Scott Lambert wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:06:04AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Tuning kern.sched.preempt_thresh did not seem to help for
> > my workload. My code is a classic master-slave OpenMPI
> > application where the ma
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 02:23:46PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 12/12/11 16:51, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:47:57PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>
> >>> Not fully right, boinc defaults to run on idprio 31 so this isn't an
> >
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:25:51PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>
> I basically went through all the e-mail you just sent and identified 4
> real report on which we could work on and summarizied in the attached
> Excel file.
> I'd like that George, Steve, Doug, Andrey and Mike
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:14:24PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/12/15 Steve Kargl :
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:25:51PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> >>
> >> I basically went through all the e-mail you just sent and identified 4
> >> real report on which
gt; ktr-ule-problem-kargl.out.gz
ktr-ule-problem-kargl.out is a 43 MB file. I don't the
freebsd.org email server would allow that file through.
--
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:31:45AM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 04:52:50PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>
>> I have placed several files at
>>
>> http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/freebsd
>>
>> dmesg.txt --> dmesg for
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:31:45AM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 04:52:50PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> > I have placed several files at
> >
> > http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/freebsd
> >
> > dmesg.txt --> dme
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 09:01:15PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 22/12/2011 20:45 Steve Kargl said the following:
> > I've used schedgraph to look at the ktrdump output. A jpg is
> > available at http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/freebsd/ktr.jpg
> > This
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:23:29PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 22 December 2011 11:47, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>
> > There is the additional observation in one of my 2008
> > emails (URLs have been posted) that if you have N+1
> > cpu-bound jobs with, say, job0 a
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:23:29PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 22 December 2011 11:47, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>
> > There is the additional observation in one of my 2008
> > emails (URLs have been posted) that if you have N+1
> > cpu-bound jobs with, say, job0 a
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:49:51PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 23 December 2011 11:11, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>
> > One difference between the 2008 tests and today tests is
> > the number of available cpus. ?In 2008, I ran the tests
> > on a node with 8 cpus, whi
far as I understand it, FLOWTABLE is both broken and
abandoned (but if I'm wrong, please let me know).
So, IMHO, not only should it not be enabled by default, but given that
it was disabled complete in 8.x after 8.0 (too lazy to look at exactly
when right now), I think it shouldn't even b
blem. Maybe Doug's failure was similar, maybe not, but I thought
I'd throw my $0.02 in.
Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPTtiJAAoJEPXPYrMgexuhp8EIAKGGtZzcxgQ4zVO5SKy1jAOH
DXLRLYfdm8NJB9hYEvtUa9/nltAE35zQMp7FU4AlZ2L2ol/J7W9aODiN0gw9AFE
s anything.
Rebooting of course fixed it, it has been a while since this happened
and it hasn't happened again since so I haven't pursued it. Just another
data point, hope it hopes.
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ad, although I find
> that system configuration and maintenance is always more painful with Linux
> than FreeBSD no matter the distribution I use...
+1000. (I understand this may not be feasible given the number of
developers, by the way)
Steve
__
ine is when it comes to package management, you
can't have it all, and you can rarely even have very much, and OS guys
really don't get much excitement from coding on pkg managers, so we're
gonna all be out of luck indefinitely no matter the platform.
Steve
On 7/12/12 4:14 PM, Charles Owens wrote:
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:36:04 pm Charles Owens wrote:
On 6/15/12 8:04 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, June 15, 2012 12:28:59 am Charles Owens wrote:
>> Hello FreeBSD folk,
>>
>> We're seeing what appears to be a storage performance regression
On 7/12/12 4:34 PM, Steve McCoy wrote:
On 7/12/12 4:14 PM, Charles Owens wrote:
On Thursday, June 21, 2012 10:36:04 pm Charles Owens wrote:
On 6/15/12 8:04 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, June 15, 2012 12:28:59 am Charles Owens wrote:
>> Hello FreeBSD folk,
>>
>&
On 12/08/09 12:41, Jeff Blank wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a little trouble using the "virtual media" function of
Dell's PowerEdge R-series (R710 in this case) iDRAC6 under FreeBSD
(7.1, 8.0). This is presented as /dev/cd0, a USB/"SCSI" device, I
guess. This is in the dmesg buffer when I boot up the
MFC it into stable/8.
As Brian stated, the change has already been MFC'd into stable/8 (June
18th) with the following comment from Jack:
"MFC to RELENG8.1 asap"
Steve
Best regards
Michael
~BAS
___
freebsd-s
On 07/01/10 15:23, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:51 AM, alan bryan wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/1/10, Garrett Cooper wrote:
From: Garrett Cooper
Subject: Re: NFS 75 second stall
To: "alan bryan"
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, July 1, 2010, 11:13 AM
On Thu, Jul 1,
imeouts once or twice
in a ZFS system with siis(4). The particular system is using drives on
port multipliers, and I can't find records of it resulting in a device
being lost. Once a whole port multiplier reported timeouts (one message
for each of the 5 drives), afterwards the whole PMP and
d is N+1 cpu intensive
task. The issue has been known for a few years.
http://freebsd.monkey.org/freebsd-current/200807/msg00278.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org/msg65839.html
--
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org maili
t ONLY the
information that is currently installed is upgraded? I don't want
anything additional installed during the upgrade.
I'm certain that by default a make buildworld/installworld will install
too much.
Will a binary upgrade 'do the right thing'?
Steve
_
pgrading anyway, so I'll bite. The
install was from an ISO image and has never been upgraded, so I know
it's not most recent.
Do you simply want an upgrade to RELENG_7 and then a report of any breakage?
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@free
/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386
The dmesg if it is relevant:
http://ww3.ibctech.ca/ids.dmesg
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
onf, I was not only able to
achieve my minimal install using buildworld etc process, I was able to
upgrade it to stable sources from this morning successfully.
I'm now off to upgrade a box that is actually _running_ 6.2, and I'll
report back with
ram
every time the device is plugged in. I am the new ezload maintainer
as of last week. ezload won't work with recent Cypress chips, but I
have a patch such that it will. If you think this is your problem,
get back to me, and I'll get you started.
On the other hand, the Cypress chip may n
e Groups): http://tinyurl.com/4xrysl
Thanks for any consideration,
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Not too say you're .iso images can't be >2GB/4GB, but I'm pretty sure
the ISO9660 standard is limited to a 2GB maximum file size (for files
within the .iso). You must use UDF to burn files of greater size.
mkisofs(8) seems to support this, if only in alpha/hybrid stage:
-udf Include
Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 19:33:00 +0300
From: "Alexandr Pakhomov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 08:38 AM 12/2/2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
mdconfig -a -t malloc -s 1800M
bout TTY changes, I assume that changed the underlying devices,
as well?
This used to be a major perk over windows for embedded systems guys
like memakes debugging serial devices a snap.
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
etty much all using ext3 these days, we're stuck in read-only for
ext3, which is rather undesirable, methinks (seems everyone's using
fuse's ntfs for this same reason [which is stable, however]). Which
is not to say stealing the ext3 (journal?) implementation and putting
it in our code isn't a better choice, I'm just pointing out there is
no good choice right now...
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
uld or should not, but I can confirm that this
> behavior was around in 7.0-RELEASE, so it's been that way for quite a
> while, at least in the 7 branch.
>
Sigh. Read the list archives. It's been this way since Peter
Wemm first introduce the ability to run i386 binaries on
amd64.
Robert Noland wrote:
I am planning to merge most all of the drm from -CURRENT to releng_7
shortly. The merge that I have staged includes the following.
Merged /head/sys:r182080,182467-182469,182883-182884,183573,183603-183605,
183828,183830-183834,184212-184213,184263,184373-184375
The
s. But, we can schedule downtime once or
twice a week if necessary.
-Steve Polyack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
oo aggressive in
my circumstances. Increasing it to 15000 solves my issue (and gets rid
of "amr0: adapter is busy" messages).
Steve Polyack wrote:
Hello,
We have a Dell PowerEdge 1850 server. It contains two PERC4 RAID
controllers. One is a PERC4e/Si, and the other is a PERC4/DC. Rig
etmask 255.255.255.255"
I'm confused. Given the /etc/rc.conf settings, the above ifconfig output
appears to be exactly what I would expect.
What is not working?
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
ive
%ping 208.70.104.211
PING 208.70.104.211 (208.70.104.211): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 208.70.104.211: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.079 ms
^C
I'll try it on one of my 7.1 boxes to see if I can reproduce the OP's issue.
Steve
___
freebsd-st
Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:12:45AM -0200, Wendell Martins Borges wrote:
>>
>>> ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.112.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
>>> ifconfig_em0_alias0="inet 192.168.
Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 08:52:18AM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> For how long? On a 7.0-R box, it works ok with a /32 prefix len:
>>
>> %ifconfig
>> re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
>> options=9b
>>
t is not returning traffic
properly.
What does # arp -a have to say, on both boxes?
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Wendell Martins Borges wrote:
>
>>> # tcpdump -n -i em0 host 192.168.112.181
>> ping for another host:
>>
>> stewie# tcpdump -n -i em0 host 192.168.112.181
>> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decod
Steve Polyack wrote:
I've seen some oddities with the partition and bsdlabel editors in the
sysinstall program on the 7.0 and 7.1 releases. The partition editor
seems to be reading or parsing the partition table incorrectly. I had
a 6.3-RELEASE system with the following layout:
worried
about? We won't be moving any other systems to 7.1 until we can clear
this up.
Thanks!
-Steve Polyack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &qu
s happened during
one of these long writes/reads. I'm not having any luck reproducing at
the moment, but if I come across a reproducible test, I will let you know.
Thanks!
Steve Polyack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
Steve Polyack wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
The fix for this that I was thinking of is already in 7.1. There
might still be a driver bug, but I'm leaning more towards the
controller simply being busy. Do you have a reproducible test case
that I could
try?
Scott
So far, I have not been ab
This is a new weird one I've never had before. Consoles work fine,
but the mouse and keyboard won't move/type when xdm pops up.
ctrl-alt-F2 takes you right to a working console, and the mouse works
fine in the console...ctrl-alt-backspace no longer kills X either...
Tha
Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
NOTE: You're using the 4e/Si, which we have as well. We're experiencing
random crashes on the 1850/8th gen, as a result of a (believed) DMA bug
introduced into 7.x
Just to note, we are only seeing these issues in combination with megarc
(/usr/ports/sysutils/megarc)
stqe_next = 0x0}, lod_witness = 0x0}}, lk_interlock =
0xff006c3848c8, lk_flags = 2589843616, lk_sharecount = -1,
lk_waitcount = -1707370640,
lk_exclusivecount = -1, lk_prio = -1, lk_timo = -1707370720,
lk_lockholder = 0x9, lk_newlock = 0x0}}
(kgdb)
I reproduce this by unionfs
Hi,
I upgraded my 7.1-RELEASE system to RELENG_7 yesterday and after
booting, re0 works for only a short time, then gives "re0: PHY read
failed" over and over. Does anyone have a suggestion on how to debug?
Thanks,
Steve
___
free
Freddie Cash wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Rink Springer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:38:21PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
I've also found a couple of Areca cards (PCI-X, non-RAID/PCIe RAID),
and have heard good things about Areca support in FreeBSD. Any
comments on thei
I have a system running 8.0-PRERELEASE with multiple drives and SATA
port multipliers (siis controllers and PMPs). All of the attached
drives are labeled via glabel(8) and then included into a ZFS pool.
During some testing to determine how the system would react to a dead
drive (simulated by
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:47:55 -0500 (EST)
Frank wrote:
> I am having problems with mouse, keyboard and APC UPS. When attempting to
> start apcupsd I get the following error:
>
> Jan 8 17:42:06 Ace apcupsd[1606]: apcupsd FATAL ERROR in generic-usb.c at
> line 636 Cannot find UPS device -- For a
On 01/22/10 11:48, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer<
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote:
Alexander Motin schrieb am 19.01.2010 17:12 (localtime):
...
Patch can be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20100119.patch
Feedback as
ot;proper"
SATA/AHCI hot-plug support and error-recovery through CAM.
-Steve Polyack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
very stable with 4GB of RAM and a
512MB arc_max. I have not modified vm.kmem_size_max (defaults to ~330GB
on amd64) or any other ZFS tunables. I'd also like to avoid syncing up
to the current 8-STABLE if at all possible.
Thanks,
Steve Polyack
_
On 02/12/10 13:47, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Steve Polyack wrote:
Has anyone had an issue with the ZFS ARC max being limited below what has
been defined in /boot/loader.conf? I just upgraded the RAM in a
ZFS-equipped system and attempted to devote 4GB to the
.
If you want to bump ARC size, you do need to bump vm.kmem_size.
--Artem
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Steve Polyack wrote:
On 02/12/10 13:47, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Steve Polyack
wrote:
Has anyone had an issue with the ZFS ARC max
On 02/15/10 12:14, Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After creating three different system configurations (Athena,
Supermicro, and HP), my configuration of choice is this Supe
On 2/15/2010 6:04 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Steve Polyack wrote:
On 02/15/10 12:14, Dan Langille wrote:
7. Supermicro LSI MegaRAID 8 Port SAS RAID Controller $118
Dan,
I'm not sure about that particular card, but we've never seen that
great of performance out of the LSI Mega
h
polls 'zpool status' looking for failed drives and performing hot-spare
replacements automatically.
Thanks,
Steve Polyack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
On 03/09/10 05:11, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 03/08/10 19:06, Steve Polyack wrote:
ZFS in FreeBSD lacks at least one major feature from the Solaris
version: hot spares. There is a PR open at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=134491, but there hasn't been
any motion/thoughts posted
27;s.
Can someone hit me with the cluebat, because I really feel that I've
missed something.
Thanks,
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
'ttyQ*' unhide
add path 'ttyR*' unhide
add path 'ttyS*' unhide
add path 'pts/*' unhide
add path 'pty/*' unhide
add path fd unhide
add path 'fd/*' unhide
add path stdin unhide
add path stdout unhide
add path stderr unhide
add path pts unhide
[devfsrules_jail=4]
add include $devfsrules_hide_all
add include $devfsrules_unhide_basic
add include $devfsrules_unhide_login
Thanks for such a quick response LI,
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
/*' prior to re-csup'ing
> My machine functions perfectly, but I can not finalize
> upgrades right now...buggerem
Provide a bit more detail with where exactly it is failing ;)
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
rgs been
incorrect?
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 2010.03.11 22:14, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> I had even used diff(8) earlier,
err, diff(1)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-
ed in /etc/defaults/devfs.rules file on the HOST OS.
Thanks much!
7.2-8.0 source upgrade with jails is 100% successful!
Good work dev team!
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To un
use the OS as a network (L2/L3) platform in many cases.
My hats off. Thanks all! What a tremendous job.
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fre
can simulate the procedure
on other hardware tomorrow to isolate the issue if you feel that this
may affect others, or if it can prove that I was just sleeping on the job.
Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
On 2010.03.11 23:30, Xin LI wrote:
> On 2010/03/11 20:26, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> On 2010.03.11 22:54, Xin LI wrote:
>>> Weird, it seems that RELENG_8_0 do contain the correct file... What
>>> does 'ident /etc/defaults/devfs.rules' show?
>
>> ...not
On 2010.03.11 23:33, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> On 2010.03.11 22:54, Xin LI wrote:
>>> Weird, it seems that RELENG_8_0 do contain the correct file... What
>>> does 'ident /etc/defaults/devfs.rules
, the FAQ should simply say "read the damn handbook and
follow it".
If I had of followed the same procedure that I've been using for the
last 7 years (at least) instead of trying to 'automate' (-a) prior to
reading the man page thoroughly, I would have been ok.
Sorry for t
available has been great so far, it goes hand and hand with Multi-IP
Jails. The only thing missing are native methods for constructing the
routing tables on boot (Yes, there is rc.local, but I don't want to go
there...).
Thanks,
Steve Polyack
nt
fragmentation/wasted space in kmem.
Regardless, this has served us quite well for the ~6 months the system
has been in use. It has never crashed, even under intensive
multi-threaded benchmarking.
-Steve
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
1 - 100 of 340 matches
Mail list logo
