Re: HP Smart array P440 support

2017-09-04 Thread Mark Saad
Hello Have you tried to update the servers firmware using the hp spp or update tool . In the past with 9.3 and 10.0 I had boot issues until I updated the servers firmware. I only have a ml10 with a p410 so I can't test much ; my job also moved to dell about 2 years ago . --- Mark

Re: 11.1 running on HyperV hn interface hangs

2017-09-06 Thread Mark Millard
achine's 16 hardware threads to FreeBSD and doing buildworld buildkernel and poudriere based port builds. (Windows 10 Pro not being otherwise busy.) === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.fre

11.1 coredumping in sendfile, as used by a uwsgi process

2017-09-12 Thread Mark Martinec
used by uwsgi seems to be the problem. For the time being I have disabled the use of sendfile in uwsgi, we'll see is this avoids the trouble. Suggestions? Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis

Re: 11.1 coredumping in sendfile, as used by a uwsgi process

2017-09-12 Thread Mark Martinec
crashing in sendfile syscall, as used by a uwsgi process https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59 Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: ABI changes within stable branch

2017-09-20 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:15:32AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > A pointer to the official policy would be nice 8-} 3rd paragraph of: http://www.freebsd.org/portmgr/policies_eol.html mcl ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd

Re: ABI changes within stable branch

2017-09-20 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 07:33:20PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > FreeBSD has always had a policy of backwards compatibility. By that > definition we are stable. What we don't promise is full forwards > compatibility, which is what you are asking for. In particular, "we add things to the ABI" sometim

stable/11 -r326142 (e.g.): "cat /dev/null | zstd --stdout" gets "/usr/bin/zstd: Undefined symbol "stat@FBSD_1.5"

2017-11-26 Thread Mark Millard
5 for some reason. Note: Using /rescue/zstd avoids this issue. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-

Should patch releases to stable 11.1 (errata) include fixes for kernel crashes?

2017-11-30 Thread Mark Martinec
't a fix for kernel crashes end up in a patch release of a stable version, with an errata notice? Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "

Re: ryzen issues?

2017-12-15 Thread Mark Millard
ant for some system --and they were not reporting such hangups, nor did they indicate running under any hypervisors. So, something more local-context-special seems to be involved. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing

11.1-STABLE for amd64: jumping from -r326142 to -r327228: all_subdir_cxgbe/t4_firmware failed to build

2017-12-26 Thread Mark Millard
tions # WITH_BOOT= WITH_LIB32= # WITHOUT_GCC_BOOTSTRAP= WITHOUT_GCC= WITHOUT_GCC_IS_CC= WITHOUT_GNUCXX= # NO_WERROR= #WERROR= MALLOC_PRODUCTION= # WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD= WITH_DEBUG_FILES= Ryzen Threadripper 1950X HW but FreeBSD -r327142 running under a Windows 10 Pro Hyper-V virtual machine. 110592 MB of RAM assigned. 29 virtual processors assigned. Physical hard disk used, not a virtual one. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

package building performance (was: Re: FreeBSD on AMD Epyc boards)

2018-02-14 Thread Mark Linimon
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:15:53AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > On the plus side: 16+16 cores, on the minus: A low CPU tact of 2.2 GHz. > Would a box like this be better for a package build host instead of 4+4 cores > with 3.x GHz ? In my experience, "it depends". I think that above a certain numb

Re: Problem with USB <---> UPS management connection

2018-03-07 Thread Mark Saad
All I lost power at home and noticed that nut didn’t work right . I had a similar dmesg . My box is running 11.1-stable amd64 built from svn 7-8 days ago . When I get power back I’ll post details . --- Mark Saad | nones...@longcount.org > On Mar 7, 2018, at 6:55 AM, wishmaster wr

Re: portsmon.freebsd.org via freshports?

2018-03-24 Thread Mark Linimon
> Is portsmon ever coming back? Sometime in Q2, yes. mcl ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: KBI unexpexted change in stable/11 ?

2018-03-28 Thread Mark Saad
ump if anyone wants a peak. --- Mark Saad | nones...@longcount.org > ___ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to

FreeBSD 10.4 kernel breaks on i7-7700 / PRIME H270M-PLUS

2018-04-01 Thread Mark Knight
the kernel boot log here: http://www.knigma.org/scratch/010418.10.4.txt I'm struggling to pin down the cause, so I'm hoping this mail might jog a memory or provide a pointer please? Motherboard is a PRIME H270M-PLUS with the latest BIOS. Thanks!! -- Mark Knight

Re: FreeBSD 10.4 kernel breaks on i7-7700 / PRIME H270M-PLUS

2018-04-02 Thread Mark Knight
pain when it's not working). Thanks in advance for any fresh ideas; I'm really not sure where to go with this! -- Mark Knight ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD 10.4 kernel breaks on i7-7700 / PRIME H270M-PLUS

2018-04-02 Thread Mark Knight
, rbp = 0x7fff7fd0 --- -- Mark Knight ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD 10.4 kernel breaks on i7-7700 / PRIME H270M-PLUS

2018-04-02 Thread Mark Knight
fill a PR and reply with the number. Thank you. Please see: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227213 Hopefully I've provided links to the necessary files. Let me know if anything else is useful! Best regards, Mark -- Mark Knight _

Re: Upgrade to 11.2-BETA1: vboxdrv kernel modulo load leads to panic unless vbox ports be rebuilt

2018-05-13 Thread Mark Saad
Jose If you have not rebuilt the virtualbox-ose-kmod package from ports with the 11.2-beta1 sources on disk ; please do so . This should resolve this issue . --- Mark Saad | nones...@longcount.org > On May 13, 2018, at 3:41 PM, Jose G. Juanino wrote: > >> On Sunday, May 13 at 1

Re: The 11.1-RC3 can only boot and attach disks in "Safe mode", otherwise gets stuck attaching

2018-05-24 Thread Mark Martinec
help). Today I have upgraded this host to 11.2-BETA2, and it is no longer necessary to disable EARLY_AP_STARTUP. Good, thanks! Mark 2017-07-20 02:03, Mark Johnston wrote: One thing to try at this point would be to disable EARLY_AP_STARTUP in the kernel config. That is, take a configuration with

Re: problems with ssh-agent after running MATE desktop

2018-05-24 Thread Mark Saad
ver what I do in .xinitrc is ‘ ssh-agent wmaker’ . Ssh-agent’s man page states it can be used in place of exec in shell scripts to inject its environment into wmaker and its child processes like xterm or urxvt in my case . You use to be able to do this in kde I am not 100% su

Re: ATI video problem - extremely slow desktop - 100% cpu load

2018-06-20 Thread Mark Saad
gories : x11-drivers Licenses : Maintainer : x...@freebsd.org WWW: UNKNOWN Comment: X.Org syscons display driver Annotations: repo_type : binary repository : FreeBSD Flat size : 21.4KiB Description: This package contain

Re: ATI video problem - slow desktop - 100% cpu load [semi-solved]

2018-06-22 Thread Mark Saad
Vincent I used the scfb driver in openbsd land for a work project . Currently I am using 11-STABLE with the Radeon driver but at one point I had a different card under 11.0 that didn’t work unless I used the scfb driver . --- Mark Saad | nones...@longcount.org > On Jun 21, 2018, at 11:41

Anyone have a summary of what kernel option RSS does ? / netisr oddness .

2018-06-22 Thread Mark Saad
is there a commit anyone can direct me to to for more insight? Is there a write up on it somewhere? Thanks again . --- Mark Saad | nones...@longcount.org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable

All the memory eaten away by ZFS 'solaris' malloc - on 11.1-R amd64

2018-07-23 Thread Mark Martinec
732693005294113354 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 was /dev/da2 The same machine with this broken pool could previously survive indefinitely under FreeBSD 10.3 . So, could this be the reason for memory depletion? Any fixes for that? Any more tests suggested to perform befor

Re: All the memory eaten away by ZFS 'solaris' malloc - on 11.1-R amd64

2018-07-31 Thread Mark Martinec
advise before I try to get rid of that faulted disk with a pool (or downgrade to 10.3, which was stable) ? Mark 2018-07-23 17:12, myself wrote: After upgrading an older AMD host from FreeBSD 10.3 to 11.1-RELEASE-p11 (amd64), ZFS is gradually eating up all memory, so that it crashes every few days

Re: All the memory eaten away by ZFS 'solaris' malloc - on 11.1-R amd64

2018-07-31 Thread Mark Johnston
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 11:54:29PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote: > I have now upgraded this host from 11.1-RELEASE-p11 to 11.2-RELEASE > and the situation has not improved. Also turned off all services. > ZFS is still leaking memory about 30 MB per hour, until the host > runs out of mem

Re: All the memory eaten away by ZFS 'solaris' malloc - on 11.1-R amd64

2018-08-01 Thread Mark Martinec
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 11:54:29PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote: I have now upgraded this host from 11.1-RELEASE-p11 to 11.2-RELEASE and the situation has not improved. Also turned off all services. ZFS is still leaking memory about 30 MB per hour, until the host runs out of memory and swap space

Re: All the memory eaten away by ZFS 'solaris' malloc - on 11.1-R amd64

2018-08-03 Thread Mark Martinec
70 570 570 570 570 570 570 Two samples of the collected dtrace output (after about 15 seconds) are at: https://www.ijs.si/usr/mark/tmp/dtrace1.out.bz2 https://www.ijs.si/usr/mark/tmp/dtrace2.out.bz2 (the dtrace2.out is probably cleaner, I made sure no other service was running except my ssh

Re: All the memory eaten away by ZFS 'solaris' malloc - on 11.1-R amd64

2018-08-04 Thread Mark Johnston
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:11:42PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote: > More attempts at tracking this down. The suggested dtrace command does > usually abort with: > >Assertion failed: (buf->dtbd_timestamp >= first_timestamp), > file > /usr/src/cddl/contrib/opensola

Re: All the memory eaten away by ZFS 'solaris' malloc - on 11.1-R amd64

2018-08-04 Thread Mark Martinec
2018-08-04 19:01, Mark Johnston wrote: I think running "zpool list" is adding a lot of noise to the output. Could you retry without doing that? No, like I said previously, the "zpool list" (with one defunct zfs pool) *is* the sole culprit of the zfs memory leak. With each

Re: All the memory eaten away by ZFS 'solaris' malloc - on 11.1-R amd64

2018-08-04 Thread Mark Johnston
On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 08:38:04PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote: > 2018-08-04 19:01, Mark Johnston wrote: > > I think running "zpool list" is adding a lot of noise to the output. > > Could you retry without doing that? > > No, like I said previously, the "zpoo

Re: All the memory eaten away by ZFS 'solaris' malloc - on 11.1-R amd64

2018-08-07 Thread Mark Martinec
On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 08:38:04PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote: 2018-08-04 19:01, Mark Johnston wrote: > I think running "zpool list" is adding a lot of noise to the output. > Could you retry without doing that? No, like I said previously, the "zpool list" (with one

Re: All the memory eaten away by ZFS 'solaris' malloc - on 11.2-R amd64

2018-08-13 Thread Mark Martinec
2018-08-04 21:47, Mark Johnston wrote: Sorry, I missed that message. Given that information, it would be useful to see the output of the following script instead: # dtrace -c "zpool list -Hp" -x temporal=off -n ' dtmalloc::solaris:malloc /pid == $

Re: All the memory eaten away by ZFS 'solaris' malloc - on 11.1-R amd64

2018-08-13 Thread Mark Martinec
ttps://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187594 The usually suggested workaround is to limit the size of the ARC, although it would be nice to find a solution to handle ARC UMA shrinking automatically, like it worked well in FreeBSD 9 but broke in FreeBSD 10. Like I said, the problem

Re: All the memory eaten away by ZFS 'solaris' malloc - on 11.1-R amd64

2018-08-17 Thread Mark Martinec
On 07/08/2018 15:58, Mark Martinec wrote: Collected, here it is:   https://www.ijs.si/usr/mark/tmp/dtrace-cmd.out.bz2 2018-08-14 11:18, Andriy Gapon wrote: I see one memory leak, not sure if it's the only one. It looks like vdev_geom_read_config() leaks all parsed vdev nvlist-s but

Re: drm / drm2 removal in 12

2018-08-24 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 07:07:24AM +0800, blubee blubeeme wrote: > Are these guys insane and please avoid the nonsense about you're doing this > in your spare time. Let us know how whatever OS you wind up using instead works for you. I suggest you look for one that will put up with your constant h

Re: drm / drm2 removal in 12

2018-08-25 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 07:22:06PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > plonk Indeed. I encourage everyone else to do the same. I'm far too old for proof-by-repetition. mcl ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f

Re: Cannot setup dumpdev on glabel disk

2018-08-31 Thread Mark Johnston
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:08:20AM -0600, Samuel Chow wrote: > I am running 11-STABLE, and I am experiencing kernel panics when I am > destroying a VIMAGE-based jail. Naturally, I flipped to the chapter > about 'Kernel Debugging' to learn about 'Obtaining a Kernel Crash Dump'. > > However, I am

Re: Cannot setup dumpdev on glabel disk

2018-08-31 Thread Mark Johnston
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 02:09:12AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 31.08.2018 23:08, Samuel Chow wrote: > > > I am running 11-STABLE, and I am experiencing kernel panics when I am > > destroying a VIMAGE-based jail. Naturally, I flipped to the chapter about > > 'Kernel Debugging' to learn about

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2018-10-04 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 08:44:11AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > OK I guess I can understand removing 10 (I personally haven't seen > one in a very long time) but 100 are omnipresent and most of my NICs > are in fact 100. Sigh. If you really plan to still be using i386 and 10/100 ether in 2024

Re: FreeBSD 11.2 kernel crash when dd

2018-10-19 Thread Mark Johnston
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 01:10:15PM +0200, Sebastian Wojtczak wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to report a kernel crash while dd on ssd drive. > > Just found that my PC crashed several times during below command: > dd if=/dev/ada2 of=file_name bs=10m. > > I was trying to make an image from my ssd dr

Re: iwi(4) in RELENG_6

2006-07-11 Thread Mark Andrews
't see it, it's transparent. > If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it. > ___ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any m

6.1 panic after approx. 49 days uptime

2006-07-16 Thread Mark Knight
Just awoke to fine my home server (6.1-RELEASE) had panicked during its daily update of /usr/ports with an uptime of 49 days. Stack trace is here: <http://www.knigma.org.uk/scratch/crash_160706.txt> Looks file system related to me. Any advice appreciated. Cheers, -- Mark A. R.

Re: 6.1 panic after approx. 49 days uptime

2006-07-16 Thread Mark Knight
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 09:32:47AM +0100, Mark Knight wrote: Just awoke to fine my home server (6.1-RELEASE) had panicked during its daily update of /usr/ports with an uptime of 49 days. Stack trace is he

Re: FreeBSD 6.0 sudden kernel panic

2006-07-16 Thread Mark Knight
ext. (kgdb) p vp->v_mount $3 = (struct mount *) 0x0 Looks similar to a panic I just reported on 6.1 Cheers, -- Mark A. R. Knight finger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 7880 556751http://www.knigma.org/ __

Re: 6.1 panic after approx. 49 days uptime

2006-07-16 Thread Mark Knight
g. Quite! Did you had unmount some filesystem before that panic happen ? No; I was fast asleep! I think the panic happened while executing a cron job that does a "cvs update" in /usr/ports. The same job ran successfully every morning for the preceding 48 days. C

Re: "scan stuck" with if_iwi(4)

2006-07-20 Thread Mark Andrews
The iwi code was recently MFC and it required a port change iwi-firmware -> iwi-firmware-kmod. Depending on when you upgraded the src and ports you may not have seen the ports change. Mark B.T.W. the new code is more stable for me. No m

Re: iwi(4) in RELENG_6

2006-07-27 Thread Mark Willson
Have you tried using the firmware from iwi-firmware-kmod, rather than iwi-firmware. I am using the former on a Thinkpad T42 and it is working ok. -mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable

Re: iwi(4) in RELENG_6

2006-07-27 Thread Mark Willson
rd and is having the same problem with STABLE. > > This all was working two weeks ago. That is, indeed, a drag. b) is bad. We are using different hardware, which I guess could be a factor. When I can boot this thing under FreeBSD (work inte

Re: named rc.d

2006-08-01 Thread Mark Andrews
> sometimes see. Use /etc/namedb/slave for slave zone. Use /etc/namedb/dynamic for dynamic zone. Mark # $FreeBSD: src/etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist,v 1.6 2004/11/04 05:24:29 gshapiro Exp $ # # Please see the file src/etc/mtree/README before making changes to this file. #

Re: error: syntax error before "_X_SENTINEL"

2006-08-09 Thread Mark Kirkwood
o fix this? Googling indicates that this is a common problem without a solution. System runs Xorg 6.9. Thank you for all your time and consideration. I saw this: http://support.zenwalk.org/index.php?PHPSESSID=84b9cfbdfe961f45c90c7c47960b2268&topic=2134.msg11956 Might be worth a try.

Re: Order of devices listed in "ifconfig"

2006-08-21 Thread Mark Andrews
f4807fff irq 9 at device 16.0 on pci0 -- ISC Training! October 16-20, 2006, in the San Francisco Bay Area, covering topics from DNS to DHCP. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards

2006-08-24 Thread Mark Kirkwood
led Gentoo on the box with the TX4000). By comparison, I have a 3ware 7506 which works perfectly. Admittedly, this is all pretty old HW, but I believe there are still similar issues with *some* newer Promise SATA cards Cheers Mark ___ freebsd-s

Re: large system date skew on RELENG_6 changes causes select() failures

2006-09-04 Thread Mark Andrews
ick; return (0); } date -j 9809051630 +%s -> 904977000 date +%s -> 1157438219 1157438219 - 904977000 -> 252461219 which is greater that 1 > -- > John-Mark GurneyVoice: +1 415 225 5579 > > "All tha

Re: large system date skew on RELENG_6 changes causes select() failures

2006-09-07 Thread Mark Andrews
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006, Mark Andrews wrote: > > >>> A while ago, by accident, I've changed the system date back to the '98 > >>> using date(1). To my astonishment, screen(1) barfed about EINVAL in > >>> select() and died. Programs, including

Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards

2006-09-08 Thread Mark Kirkwood
between disk firmware and the Areca, or unfortunate choice of strip chunk size). Cheers Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards

2006-09-09 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Mark Kirkwood wrote: Obviously if your array is RAID10, the 180MB/s is very good! Also unlikely - RAID10 with 5 disks?? - brain fade - sorry. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable

Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards

2006-09-09 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Steven Hartland wrote: Mark Kirkwood wrote: If you are using RAID0|5, then something is slowing you down (possible clash between disk firmware and the Areca, or unfortunate choice of strip chunk size). Dont know which test I was remembering but just did a quicky: OS: FreeBSD 6.1 RAID: 5 on 5

Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!

2006-09-09 Thread Mark Andrews
it into a release. That is done by having a wider diversity of clients run the BETA code. Occasionally you have bugs that make it through both the ALPHA and BETA stages. Mark -- ISC Training! October 16-20, 2006, in the San Francisco Bay Area, covering topics from

Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!

2006-09-09 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding was > that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back to it *was* tested and deemed > stable ... http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/version-guide/

Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!

2006-09-10 Thread Mark Kirkwood
lem is not enough of us running -CURRENT, so bugs can slip through into -STABLE via MFC (I know I'm guilty here - 2 boxes running -STABLE, none on -CURRENT....) Cheers Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/m

Re: optimization levels for 6-STABLE build{kernel,world}

2006-09-13 Thread Mark Andrews
# 24134177 > > > > ___ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > -- >Ga

RELENG_6 power button ignored after halt if ACPI enabled

2006-09-16 Thread Mark Kirkwood
rms of getting more information to help debug this, what is the best way to proceed? Cheers Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: RELENG_6 power button ignored after halt if ACPI enabled

2006-09-17 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Oops - didn't know about the -acpi mailing list, will post there, sorry. Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Is there any good reason for get*by*_r()?

2006-09-25 Thread Mark Andrews
get*by*_r() are deprecated on most platforms and there use is highly non-portable, lots of different API's. Why are we adding compatability for deprecated functions? Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2

Re: Is there any good reason for get*by*_r()?

2006-09-27 Thread Mark Andrews
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > get*by*_r() are deprecated on most platforms and there use > > is highly non-portable, lots of different API's. > > My understanding was that FreeBSD has copied the Linux version of the > API. Tha

Re: ath based card

2006-09-28 Thread Mark Kane
or the upcoming 6.2 if it is a software issue. For general use (surfing/email/IRC/SSH/streaming audio) it works pretty well. Personally I prefer the Netgear or Linksys brands over D-Link. -Mark -- Internet Radio: Party107 (Trance/Electronic) - http://www.party107.com Rock 101.9 The Edge (Rock) -

Re: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon

2006-10-11 Thread Mark Linimon
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:21:06PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Is it envisageable to extend the RELENG_4's and RELENG_4_11's EoL once > more ? >From a ports standpoint: absolutely not. We are currently trying to support 4 major CVS branches. Although we still have some dedicated committers wh

Re: Question on runing STABLE on old Intel SMP boards

2006-10-12 Thread Mark Kirkwood
d - had to use hw.acpi.disable_on_reboot=1 to get the power button to switch the box off after halt tho. Cheers Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon

2006-10-12 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:59:10AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > For anyone who really wishes to stick to FreeBSD 4.x for performance, > we should refer them to dragonflybsd, which seems to be taking this > approach. It was forked from FreeBSD 4.8 and seems to pretty modern > in userland. Dra

Machine hangs when loading snd_emu10k1

2006-10-13 Thread Mark Kane
r seven hard drives, so I wanted to post here first in case it's known already or if anyone has any suggestions before doing it again. Thanks in advance. -Mark -- Internet Radio: Party107 (Trance/Electronic) - http://www.party107.com Rock 101.9 The Edge (Rock) - http://www.rock1019.n

Re: Machine hangs when loading snd_emu10k1

2006-10-14 Thread Mark Kane
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006, at 19:32:39 -0500, Mark Kane wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I rebooted my machine today and when it came back up and I tried to > load the snd_emu10k1 kernel module, the machine hung without returning > to the prompt. I tried waiting 5-10+ minutes and

Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x (was: e: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon)

2006-10-15 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:57:32AM -0700, Danial Thom wrote: > Stating facts is not trolling. true, but ... > The fact that you may not want to hear it is your own problem [...] > You can't keep promoting this junk they're putting out. You can't just > keep kicking the Matt Dillons out of the cam

Re: Machine hangs when loading snd_emu10k1

2006-10-15 Thread Mark Kane
describe more about what you want me to do? I'd be glad to help however I can to track the problem down, but I don't really know what to look for as far as commits go, and I'm not sure the date of my cvsup/rebuild before Sept 21 so I wouldn't know how far back to look either. Th

Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x

2006-10-15 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:01:08PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: > For everyone's benefit then, please feel free to submit your patches > along with your technical analysis. I think his best bet is a fork, instead. Then he can tell all the people that volunteer to work on _his_ project exactly wha

Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x

2006-10-15 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Mark Linimon wrote: On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:01:08PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: For everyone's benefit then, please feel free to submit your patches along with your technical analysis. I think his best bet is a fork, instead. Then he can tell all the people that volunteer to wo

Re: 6.x from i386 to amd64

2006-10-31 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:31:34PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Greg Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The state of the software out there is disgracefully far from > > being ready for 64-bit platforms -- after wasting weeks in a > > vain attempt to get a workable development environment

Re: 6.x from i386 to amd64

2006-10-31 Thread Mark Linimon
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 06:52:27AM +1000, Greg Black wrote: > I found that a very large number of ports that mattered to me were marked > i386 only. In some cases these designations are obsolete. They will require people- power to work through them and see if they are overused. In particular, ma

Re: bind9 trouble in -PRERELEASE

2006-11-01 Thread Mark Andrews
; ___ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley,

Re: New em driver breaks jumbo frames

2006-11-02 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 02:09:29PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > Yes, this is the second report I've had, other came to me personally. There is already a PR about it. mcl ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Dissapointing performance of ciss RAID 0+1 ?

2006-11-08 Thread Mark Kirkwood
he read by playing with the vfs.read_max sysctl (try 16 or 32). cheers Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Dissapointing performance of ciss RAID 0+1 ?

2006-11-09 Thread Mark Kirkwood
h that level of performance (nice job to those of you who have been steadily making 6-STABLE go faster)! Cheers Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: twa: Passthru request timed out! Resetting controller...

2006-11-14 Thread Mark Dotson
ch ANY other system, they worked fantastically. I don't have an answer for the "resetting problem" as of yet... 3ware and Tyan (And my system vendor "Appro") are still trying to find my specific problem and solve it. I believe they are currently doing the "replace

Re: FreeBSD 6.x, NIS, local root password, and nsswitch.conf

2006-11-22 Thread Mark Hennessy
David Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Mark Hennessy wrote: I have a new system that has FreeBSD 6.1 on it to replace a system with FreeBSD 4.11 being put out of service. I want to keep to using local root passwords only, but export other users' logins over NIS. It

Re: FreeBSD 6.x, NIS, local root password, and nsswitch.conf

2006-11-22 Thread Mark Hennessy
David Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Mark Hennessy wrote: David Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Mark Hennessy wrote: >> I have a new system that has FreeBSD 6.1 on it to replace a system with >> FreeBSD 4.11 being put out of service.

Re: UFS Bug: FreeBSD 6.1/6.2/7.0: MOKB-08-11-2006, CVE-2006-5824, MOKB-03-11-2006, CVE-2006-5679

2006-11-25 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 05:30:49PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > On the other hand, Scott, where are all the Kernel developer has been > gone to? There is this minor task called a "release cycle" in process at the moment. That is where all the developer attention to -stable is going right now. mcl

Re: vr speed issues

2006-11-29 Thread Mark Kirkwood
eed when I was using it. Cheers Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

some PR submissions are currently being lost

2006-11-30 Thread Mark Linimon
For reasons that we don't yet understand, some PR submissions are currently not making it in to GNATS. This seems to be a different problem from the one that Ken Smith fixed a few days ago (corrupted cvsup file); in that case, the PRs were successfully going in, but neither being acknowledged nor

Re: vr speed issues

2006-11-30 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Mark Kirkwood wrote: Charles Sprickman wrote: I also did a little more digging and noticed that once I start pinging from one of these hosts using large packet sizes, I get about 50-60% packet loss (ie: ping -s 1500 other.vr0.host). If I ping something with a decent card, I get about 30-50

Re: vr speed issues

2006-11-30 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Mark Kirkwood wrote: I plugged in the card today, and seem to get pretty reasonable performance (8-10MB/s for scp - see attached). sorry, forgot to add... this is on: 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Nov 28 23:55:20 NZDT 2006 with a kernel that differs a small amount from

wicontrol on 5.3

2004-11-07 Thread Mark Knight
pci1 wi0: using RF:PRISM2.5 MAC:ISL3874A(Mini-PCI) wi0: Intersil Firmware: Primary (1.1.0), Station (1.4.9) wi0: Ethernet address: 00:09:5b:2f:b3:03 wi0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps Cheers, -- Mark A. R. Knight finger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 7973 410732

Freeze in 5.3 Release Install

2004-11-10 Thread Mark Jacobs
UDMA33. The attempted install failed twice at the same point. A hard reboot of the machine is required. Mark Jacobs ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Freeze in 5.3 Release Install

2004-11-11 Thread Mark Jacobs
On Thursday 11 November 2004 10:17 am, Charles Ulrich wrote: > Mark Jacobs said: > > I downloaded the 5.3 release cd and successfully used it to install on my IBM > > T42 laptop. > > > > Today I attempted to upgrade the machine that was running 4.10 stable to 5.3

Re: ULE Scheduler available in 5.3-RELEASE?

2004-11-11 Thread Mark Magiera
as T. Veldhouse > Key Fingerprint: 07C7 BF05 4176 F50B A083 4542 0118 1315 761F D300 > Spammers please contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I beleive the errata document takes precedance over the release notes. In which case... (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html#OPEN-ISSUES) "(1 Nov

Re: Freeze in 5.3 Release Install

2004-11-11 Thread Mark Jacobs
I rebooted again tonight with verbose logging and the last messages on the console were; (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): error 22 (probe0:sbp0:0:0:0): Unretryable Error Probe1-6 are listed after this, all with the same error 22 After the probe6 message the machine hangs. Mark Jacobs

Build of RELENG_5 fails in libmagic

2004-11-13 Thread Mark Dixon
Hi, I'm trying to build 5-STABLE, I have cvsuped the latest source, cleared out /usr/obj and I still get this problem. Any idea what could be causing it? Mark ===> lib/libmagic cat /usr/src/lib/libmagic/../../contrib/file/Header /usr/src/lib/libmagic/../../contrib/file/Localstuff

Build of RELENG_5 fails in libmagic

2004-11-13 Thread Mark Dixon
Hi, I'm trying to build 5-STABLE, I have cvsuped the latest source, cleared out /usr/obj and I still get this problem. Any idea what could be causing it? Mark ===> lib/libmagic cat /usr/src/lib/libmagic/../../contrib/file/Header /usr/src/lib/libmagic/../../contrib/file/Localstuff

Re: Build of RELENG_5 fails in libmagic

2004-11-14 Thread Mark Dixon
On Saturday 13 Nov 2004 21:01, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 08:17:31PM +0000, Mark Dixon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to build 5-STABLE, I have cvsuped the latest source, cleared > > out /usr/obj and I still get this problem. Any idea what co

Re: X installation.

2004-11-20 Thread Mark Magiera
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-post.html#DEFAULT-DESKTOP or http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x11-wm.html#X11-WM-GNOME-INSTALL Why is this on freebsd-stable? surely this is more suited for freebsd-x11 or freebsd-questions. -- Mark

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >