Re: PATCH: FreeBSD-7-BETA4 'bge' ether for Dell T105 server

2007-12-23 Thread Mark Andrews
C > #define BCOM_DEVICEID_BCM5751 0x1677 > ___ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

2007-12-24 Thread Mark Fullmer
On Dec 24, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: Mark, could you, please, retest the patch below in your setup ? I want to put a change or some edition of it into the 7.0 release, and we need to move fast to do this. It's building now. The testing will run overnight. Your pat

Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

2007-12-26 Thread Mark Fullmer
0:04.62 [softdepflush] Building a new kernel with KTR and FULL_PREEMPTION now. -- mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

PR backlog [was: Re: usb/umass, devfs: this sucks]

2007-12-26 Thread Mark Linimon
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 06:15:16PM +0100, Henrik Gulbrandsen wrote: > Fixing and merging are good, but it seems to me (as an occasional patch > contributor without commit privileges) that the bottleneck for USB is > still in the handling of incoming patches [...] if a one-line fix > such as that in

Re: PR backlog

2007-12-26 Thread Mark Linimon
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 12:43:06PM -0800, Richard Neese wrote: > Point and Fax I have emaile Sobomax about fixing and updating the asterisk > ports. and have sent patches but never got a reply in 9 months. For situations like this you need to email [EMAIL PROTECTED] We already have defined para

Re: PR backlog [was: Re: usb/umass, devfs: this sucks]

2007-12-29 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 01:01:19AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 26 Dec 2007 > 12:04:15 -0600): > > > - The creation of a weekly posting "bugs the bugmeister team thinks are > > ready for commit".

HEADSUP: new wiki page: State of Packages on Sparc64

2008-01-02 Thread Mark Linimon
I've just posted a message with that title to sparc64@ with crosspost to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you're interested in deciding on where we're going with sparc64, I invite you to join that thread. (Please don't reply to this message; 2 lists is probably one too many). mcl ___

Re: 6.3-RELEASE

2008-01-15 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:51:13PM +0200, George Kontostanos wrote: > So may I guess that we have a release ? This question happens every time we get near a release. There will be a release when, and only when, a signed email is sent from the Release Engineering team to the various mailing lists.

Re: 6.3-RELEASE

2008-01-17 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:59:01PM -0800, Josef Grosch wrote: > I have a mirror at work (Juniper Networks) and we have had all the > bits since Tuesday. You can't have; the final sparc64-6 packages were just finished yesterday, at the last second. mcl _

Re: FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE Available

2008-01-18 Thread Mark Linimon
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 03:51:43PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote: > Due to resource limitations (both human and computer) there won't > be an ia64 6.3-RELEASE but there will be an ia64 7.0-RELEASE. Unless something changes rapidly, ia64-7 will not have any packages shipped with it: the last I tried, it w

Re: GCC segfaulting while trying to compile latest Qt4 code

2009-03-05 Thread Mark Atkinson
e that faults in gcc with this turned on. You can try adding vm.pmap.pg_ps_enabled="0" to /boot/loader.conf, rebooting and see if that fixes the problem. If so, you might provide the list with your hardware configuration. For reference: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebs

Re: GCC segfaulting while trying to compile latest Qt4 code

2009-03-06 Thread Mark Atkinson
disk corruption can cause this. If you can complete a buildworld, a fresh buildworld and installworld with make delete-old might solve your compilation problems.If qt depends on the gcc in ports, you may have to rebuild that one as well afterwards. -- Mark Atkinson atkin...@yahoo.com

Re: rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused

2009-03-17 Thread Mark Andrews
channel simple_log { > file "/var/log/named/named.log" versions 5 size 20m; > severity warning; > print-time yes; > print-category yes; > print-severity yes; >}; >... > > > -

Re: FreeBSD 7.2 Release process starting...

2009-03-21 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 09:18:03AM +1100, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > Is there any way to automatically create such a page from the bug > tracker? Not that fills in the dates, no. We are working on a prototype to track particular PRs. mcl ___ freebsd

Re: dump | restore fails: unknown tape header type 1853384566

2009-03-24 Thread Mark Kirkwood
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org/msg197899.html Other than that, I'd suggest checking the disk(s) with smartmontools to try to rule out hardware problems. regards Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing

Buildworld Failure with MODULES_WITH_WORLD=true

2009-06-09 Thread Mark Skurzynski
** Error code 1Stop in /usr/src.*** Error code 1Stop in /usr/src.*** Error code 1Stop in /usr/src.Any ideas on how to resolve this?Thank you,Mark--*** * Mark Skurzynski * Lomag Internet Services, LLC m...@lomag.net * http://www.lomag.net E

Buildworld Failure with MODULES_WITH_WORLD=true

2009-06-09 Thread Mark Skurzynski
rror code 1Stop in /usr/src.*** Error code 1Stop in /usr/src.*** Error code 1Stop in /usr/src.Any ideas on how to resolve this?Thank you,Mark--*** * Mark Skurzynski * Lomag Internet Services, LLC m...@lomag.net * http://www.lomag.net Edison

Re: mini-HEADSUP bce owners: please test

2009-06-18 Thread Mark Plotnick
We have a Dell R710 with its first ethernet port connected to a Dell 5524 ethernet switch. Just installed 7.2-RELEASE on it and get no connectivity over the ethernet. tcpdump shows no frames at all. Installing your patches eliminated the PHY write timeout errors, but still have no connectivity.

Re: Shell execution ( [was] Re: Value of $? lost in the beginning of a function.)

2009-07-19 Thread Mark Andrews
___ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" "#!" is used to define the interpretor when the

ZFS RAIDZ and atacontrol spindown settings

2009-07-20 Thread Mark Stapper
d like it better if the four discs would spin up simultaneously. Thus my question: "Is it possible to \"group\" discs to be spun up together, or to issue a custom command upon upspinning of a disc such as to spin up other disks?" Thanks! Greetz, Mark signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: ZFS RAIDZ and atacontrol spindown settings

2009-07-21 Thread Mark Stapper
Ivan Voras wrote: > 2009/7/21 Mark Stapper : > >> Ivan Voras wrote: >> >>> Mark Stapper wrote: >>> >>>> Good day, >>>> >>>> I am the proud user of a FreeBSD 7.2 AMD64 system housing, amongst other >>>

Re: ZFS RAIDZ and atacontrol spindown settings

2009-07-22 Thread Mark Stapper
Arnaud Houdelette wrote: > Mark Stapper a écrit : >> Ivan Voras wrote: >> >>> 2009/7/21 Mark Stapper : >>> >>>> Ivan Voras wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mark Stapper wrote: >>>>> &

Re: ZFS RAIDZ and atacontrol spindown settings

2009-07-23 Thread Mark Stapper
Arnaud Houdelette wrote: > Mark Stapper wrote: >> Arnaud Houdelette wrote: >> >>> Mark Stapper a écrit : >>> >>>> Ivan Voras wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> 2009/7/21 Mark Stapper : >>>

Re: Cannot rm files when ZFS is full

2009-07-29 Thread Mark Stapper
planation and probably not entirely correct, but I hope it suffices. > Only hope: Make sure that not all disk space is used. > > Christian > Indeed, if by some coincident (like a growing logfile) every single byte is used, even the copy action might fail... To prevent this you coul

Re: ZFS RAIDZ and atacontrol spindown settings

2009-08-05 Thread Mark Stapper
Arnaud Houdelette wrote: > Mark Stapper wrote: >> Arnaud Houdelette wrote: >> >>> Mark Stapper a écrit : >>> >>>> Ivan Voras wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> 2009/7/21 Mark Stapper : >>>

Re: zfs on gmirror slice

2009-09-02 Thread Mark Stapper
rom. Takes a little more efford, but is more uniform. Updating zfs will be a pain though. You would have to boot from another filesystem to be able to update your root filesystem. If you'll be reinstalling your system, you might want to check out FreeBSD 8 because zfs boot support is better. Hope it helps. Greetz, Mark signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: zfs on gmirror slice

2009-09-02 Thread Mark Stapper
Emil Mikulic wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 09:20:21AM +0200, Mark Stapper wrote: > >> updating a zfs filesystem which you are running from is next to >> impossible. >> > > [citation needed] :) > Well, to update your zfs filesystem version, the fi

Re: zfs on gmirror slice

2009-09-02 Thread Mark Stapper
Thomas Backman wrote: > On Sep 2, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Mark Stapper wrote: > >> > Nothing a LiveCD or something to that regard can't handle. Obviously > this doesn't work for everyone, but it should for many. Actually it won't because updating zfs comes with updati

Re: Not getting an IPv6 in a jail

2009-09-02 Thread Mark Andrews
t; address instead of the old fe80 as suggested. > > BIND's now happily running in its jail and responding to public > queries. > > > Perhaps a small addition to the jails entry in the Handbook to > advise people about the use of IP6 addresses on loopback interfaces &g

Re: Subscribe to your mailing list(off topic)

2009-09-03 Thread Mark Stapper
> Considering your name, I understand why you need the accent marks. > > Have you looked at the instructions in chapter 23 of the handbook? > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/hu/books/handbook/l10n.html > > Minden jót kivánok > > -jeff > Just off topic.. but.. Magyar? Egészségedre! Mark signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

STABLE clang planned update MFC path (3.4.1 STABLE, 3.7.0, CURRENT) vs. powerpc64

2015-10-11 Thread Mark Millard
1 and libc++" list in that last paragraph given the "upgrade easily" context intended. (If there is an easy powerpc64 upgrade then I'd like to see notes about it: Other contexts might be able to use similar techniques. I started my explorations with 10.) === Mark Millard m

Re: STABLE clang planned update MFC path (3.4.1 STABLE, 3.7.0, CURRENT) vs. powerpc64

2015-10-11 Thread Mark Millard
tation fault. I'm still not sure that the stable/9 to stable/10 update would be reliably clean for powerpc64, despite -mlongcall not being used at that stage. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net On 2015-Oct-11, at 8:05 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2014-Oct-11 Dimitry Andric wrote:

Re: Segmentation fault running ntpd

2015-10-30 Thread Mark Martinec
fine there! I haven't tried yet to build it with debugging, or capture a core dump. Puzzling... Mark 2015-10-30 12:34, je David Wolfskill napisal On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:42:07AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: David Wolfskill writes: > ... > bound to 172.17.1.245 --

Re: Segmentation fault running ntpd

2015-11-04 Thread Mark Martinec
Upgrading 10.2-RELEASE-p6 to 10.2-RELEASE-p7 now solved ntpd crashes (apparently fixed by: FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-15:20.vm). Thanks!!! Mark On 2015-11-01 10:31, Andre Albsmeier wrote: On Fri, 30-Oct-2015 at 19:47:59 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote: Not sure if it's the same

Re: sshpass

2015-11-25 Thread Mark Linimon
Please submit this via bugzilla so that it will not get lost in all the mailing list traffic. Thank you. mcl ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-

A recent 10.2-STABLE no longer builds on a no-exec /usr/src file system

2015-11-26 Thread Mark Martinec
, a simple workaround is to run shell from a command line instead of as a shebang, i.e.: # /bin/sh /usr/src/contrib/netbsd-tests/lib/libc/net/gen_ether_subr instead of: # /usr/src/contrib/netbsd-tests/lib/libc/net/gen_ether_subr Mark ___ f

Re: A recent 10.2-STABLE no longer builds on a no-exec /usr/src file system

2015-12-07 Thread Mark Martinec
So, is this a new state of affairs that /usr/src file system needs to be mounted exec in order for buildworld to succeed, or is this an unintended change and I should file a bug report? Mark On 2015-11-26 19:44, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Mark Martinec wrote on 11/26/2015 19:31: Up to about a

dev/random warning on 10-STABLE after r292122 up till r292855

2016-01-04 Thread Mark Saad
://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?action=dmesgd&do=view&id=2871 I checked in svn and there are no recent changes to sys/dev/random . Does anyone have any insight into this ? -- mark saad | nones...@longcount.org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mail

Re: dev/random warning on 10-STABLE after r292122 up till r292855

2016-01-05 Thread Mark Saad
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Mark Saad wrote: > >> All >> At NYC*BUG we are looking into a warning seen on FreeBSD 10-STABLE amd64 >> starting at or about r292122 and still up till r292855. >> >&

Re: dev/random warning on 10-STABLE after r292122 up till r292855

2016-01-05 Thread Mark Saad
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2016-Jan-04 16:44:49 -0500, Mark Saad wrote: > >On boot dmesg logs the following warning not seen on 10.2-RELEASE amd64. > > > >random device not loaded; using insecure entropy > > When I first noticed this, I

Re: A recent 10.2-STABLE no longer builds on a no-exec /usr/src file system

2016-01-14 Thread Mark Martinec
n 10.3 - or at least it should be clearly documented in release notes. Mark On 2015-12-07 16:35, Mark Martinec wrote: So, is this a new state of affairs that /usr/src file system needs to be mounted exec in order for buildworld to succeed, or is this an unintended change and I should file a bu

Re: A recent 10.2-STABLE no longer builds on a no-exec /usr/src file system

2016-01-14 Thread Mark Martinec
out the WITH_TESTS="yes" from /etc/make.conf avoids the problem - although this was not necessary in 10.2-RELEASE, as far as I can tell. Mark On 1/14/2016 7:42 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: Prompted by recent security advisories I did a 'make buildworld' on a fresh svn checko

Re: Is UEFI required for ZFS?

2016-02-12 Thread Mark Dixon
an instant. Several others have the same problem. See here on the freebsd forums: http://tinyurl.com/z9oldkc (URL shortened cos I'm only allowed 80chars per line) Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/ma

Re: Is UEFI required for ZFS?

2016-02-12 Thread Mark Dixon
Kurt Jaeger opsec.eu> writes: > > Hi! > > > I have a new Asus H170-Plus-D3 motherboard that will be used for a DOM0 Xen > > Server. It uses an Intel i5-6300 processor and a Samsung 840 EVO SSD. I > > would like to use ZFS on this new installation. The Xen Kernel does not have > > UEFI sup

Re: Is UEFI required for ZFS?

2016-02-13 Thread Mark Dixon
Konstantin Belousov gmail.com> writes: > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 09:15:49PM +0000, Mark Dixon wrote: > > > Can you put a dmesg.boot from the server ? An pciconf -lvb ? > > > > > > > I have the exact same issue on the forum, so I can: > As a blind s

Re: Is UEFI required for ZFS?

2016-02-14 Thread Mark Dixon
Konstantin Belousov gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 03:46:16PM +, Mark Dixon wrote: > Might be, try the following (mostly debugging) change. > Tried it, the only thing I saw different is after the menu I got: rd eef611d6 Hope that

Re: ZFS ARC vs Inactive memory on 10-STABLE: is it Ok?

2016-02-15 Thread Mark Saad
5cNGG+SxupZajtIuaCBTeUv0QwjnDH5 > Pnu44Xe4MCvpDSt9odICdzytxO6yzwL7mLj70o2SsPs2ijN1w/fOlNqS46bekmJ/ > MtvVwObCRnoDg3aMRUL0 > =In6V > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > ___ > freebsd...@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: 10.3-BETA2 regression in MPT

2016-02-19 Thread Mark Saad
x27;m remembering correctly, a volume with more than 2 drives creates a > passN device for all but one of the drives. > >Terry Kennedy http://www.glaver.org New York, NY USA > ___ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" --- Mark Saad | nones...@longcount.org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: 10.3-BETA2 regression in MPT

2016-02-19 Thread Mark Saad
or messages from > the probes. > > Let me know if you need any additional info. > > Terry Kennedy http://www.glaver.org New York, NY USA > Can you build 10-STABLE and merge back the mpt driver prior to r285840 . It looks like a change was merged in about 7

Re: net-im/skype4 under FreeBSD 10.3

2016-02-22 Thread Mark Dixon
Pavel Timofeev gmail.com> writes: > > Hi! > Has anybody tried net-im/skype4 under FreeBSD 10.3(-BETA[0-9])?? > Seems like net-im/skype4 missing some dependencies and if it's > satisfied net-im/skype4 hangs after start. > linprocfs mounting doesn't help. > I installed them all from the ports tree

Re: Skylake Loader Performance 10.3-BETA3

2016-03-04 Thread Mark Dixon
Will Green sundivenetworks.com> writes: > > I am happy to test patches and/or current on this server if that helps. If you want more details on the > motherboard/system I have started a post on it at http://buildwithbsd.org/hw/skylake_xeon_server.html > I've made the UEFI switch which worked f

Re: Where is 10.2-STABLE?

2016-03-30 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:32:45AM +1100, Jason Tubnor wrote: > 10.3-RELEASE has been available for a few days now No, it hasn't. The bits for what _may be_ 10.3-RELEASE, barring the finding of any last-minute problems, are what is there. In at least one previous release cycle, last-minute probl

Re: Where is 10.2-STABLE?

2016-03-31 Thread Mark Linimon
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:04:30PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > I would however like to ask if there is an ETA for 10.3-RELEASE > actually being official and final. >From the front page of www.freebsd.org, click on the link "Upcoming: 10.3" which will take you to https://www.freebsd.org/rel

Re: Weird portupgrade error on current amd64 [and powerpc64?] (-r298192 and later; also now on stable as of -r298920 and later)

2016-05-02 Thread Mark Millard
gt; and proceeded usual rebuilding procedure. > > Fortunately, there was only 3 commits between r298836 and r298920, > and I got right one in first attempt. > > But unfortunately, fixing portupgrade[-devel] or file/libmagic beyonds > my hand. :-< I have taken Tomoaki'

Re: sparc64 on stable/10 panics with r299673

2016-05-13 Thread Mark Johnston
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 04:14:34PM -0400, Kurt Lidl wrote: > I updated one of my sparc64 machines (a V240, dual processor, 8GB > of memory) and now it panics. > > Before (working without issue): > FreeBSD spork.pix.net 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #18 r299561: Thu > May 12 16:28:16 EDT 2016 >

Re: Nasty state after running out of swap

2016-06-08 Thread Mark Johnston
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:02:09PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote: > In my absence my desktop managed to run out of memory and had to kill a > number of processes: > > pid 47493 (firefox), uid 105, was killed: out of swap space > pid 1665 (thunderbird), uid 105, was killed: out of swap space >

Re: mfi driver performance too bad on LSI MegaRAID SAS 9260-8i

2016-06-21 Thread Mark Felder
e > performance of LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i and had the following bad result: > > 1. Test environment: >(1) OS: FreeBSD 10.0 release 10.0-RELEASE is no longer supported. Can you reproduce this on 10.3-RELEASE? -- Mark Felder f...@feld.me

Re: mfi driver performance too bad on LSI MegaRAID SAS 9260-8i

2016-06-21 Thread Mark Felder
the write penalty on each read access. We need more data :-) -- Mark Felder ports-secteam member f...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Recent stable: bsnmpd eats up memory and cpu

2016-07-05 Thread Mark Huizer
e device, and bsnmp went back to normal. "Interesting". So far I didn't notice memory issues. Mark -- Nice testing in little China... ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To

Re: Recent stable: bsnmpd eats up memory and cpu

2016-07-05 Thread Mark Huizer
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:38:23AM +0200, Mark Huizer wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 12:01:07AM +0200, Wolfgang Zenker wrote: > > Hi, > > > > after updating some 10-STABLE systems a few days ago, I noticed that on > > two of those systems bsnmpd started to use up

11.0: amd64 -> armv6 -r302331 -> -r302412 re-cross-build (update): got "sh: ./make_keys: Exec format error" again for init_ketry.h in ncursesw

2016-07-08 Thread Mark Millard
; WITH_CLANG_FULL= > WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS= > WITH_LLDB= > # > WITH_BOOT= > WITHOUT_LIB32= > WITHOUT_LIBSOFT= > # > WITHOUT_ELFTOOLCHAIN_BOOTSTRAP= > WITHOUT_GCC_BOOTSTRAP= > WITHOUT_GCC= > WITHOUT_GCC_IS_CC= > WITHOUT_GNUCXX= > # > NO_WERROR= > #WERROR= > MALLOC_PRODUCTION= > # > WITH_DEBUG_FILES= > # > XCFLAGS+= -march=armv7-a -mcpu=cortex-a7 > XCXXFLAGS+= -march=armv7-a -mcpu=cortex-a7 make.conf was empty. The earlier -r302331 cross build had WITH_LIBSOFT= in use. -r302412 is my first testing of WITHOUT_LIBSOFT= after rebuilding all ports to avoid libsoft. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

11.0 -r302412: check-old does not list older /usr/libsoft/. . . materials; delete-old and delete-old-libs do not delete them

2016-07-08 Thread Mark Millard
of a different issue when WITH_META_MODE was attempted. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: "make delete-old" failed: 11.0-ALPHA6 @r302388 -> stable/11 @r302412

2016-07-08 Thread Mark Millard
= "arm" does not appear to achieve the original test's intent and will mishandle things list armv6 as far as I can tell. (It certainly does avoid the malformed conditional problem that stops the build.) === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___

[Bug 210953] 11.0 -r302412 via powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc fails to build: dev/ahci/ahci.c:288:22: error: unknown conversion type character 'b' in format; too many arguments for format

2016-07-09 Thread Mark Millard
27;: > /usr/src/sys/modules/ahci/../../dev/ahci/ahci.c:288:22: error: unknown > conversion type character 'b' in format [-Werror=format=] >device_printf(dev, "quirks=0x%b\n", ctlr->quirks, > ^ > /usr/src/sys/modules/ahci/../../dev/ahci/ahci.

Re: [Bug 210953] 11.0 -r302412 via powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc fails to build: dev/ahci/ahci.c:288:22: error: unknown conversion type character 'b' in format; too many arguments for format

2016-07-09 Thread Mark Millard
[Top post of probable "already fixed" status.] It looks like -r320441 on stable/11 reverted a kern.mk change controlling what formats are (un)available for some compilers. I'm rebuilding things based on -r302457 instead of -r302412 and will close the defect if things work. =

Re: [Bug 210953] 11.0 -r302412 via powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc fails to build: dev/ahci/ahci.c:288:22: error: unknown conversion type character 'b' in format; too many arguments for format

2016-07-09 Thread Mark Millard
On 2016-Jul-9, at 8:53 PM, Ngie Cooper wrote: >> On Jul 9, 2016, at 18:52, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote: >> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210953 >> >> Mark Millard changed: > > I accidentally committed this regression to ker

Re: amd64 -> armv6 [and powerpc64] -r302331 -> -r302412 re-cross-build (update): got "sh: ./make_keys: Exec format error" again for init_ketry.h in ncursesw

2016-07-10 Thread Mark Millard
On 2016-Jul-8, at 12:23 AM, Mark Millard wrote --but with a few []'d notes added: > [Before the below cross build/update attempt I updated my amd64 from -r302331 > -> -r302412.] > > Summary: It appears that WITHOUT_META_MODE= still needs to be forced for > cross comp

stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

2016-07-11 Thread Mark Millard
ile SRCS being ppc64_elf_freebsd.c). === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

2016-07-11 Thread Mark Millard
est > build with the -CFLAGS+= -Wa,-mppc64bridge line removed? > -Nathan > > On 07/11/16 03:55, Mark Millard wrote: >> Is the following something that should be updated something like is >> indicated below for 11.0-BETA1? Is kboot powerpc64 specific? >> >> #

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

2016-07-11 Thread Mark Millard
On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:04 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2016-Jul-11, at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> >> It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and >> 64-bit kernels. Those two flags are probably obsolete at this point and were >

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

2016-07-11 Thread Mark Millard
On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:30 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:04 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2016-Jul-11, at 6:49 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >>> >>> It is not 64-bit only; like the normal loader, it can load both 32-bit and >>> 64-bi

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

2016-07-11 Thread Mark Millard
kboot in. I'll enter a report showing the sys/boot/powerpc/kboot/Makefile change that I tried. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:43 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:30 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2016-Jul-11, at 11:04 AM, Ma

Re: stable/11 question: kboot vs. powerpc: only powerpc64?

2016-07-11 Thread Mark Millard
On 2016-Jul-11, at 1:51 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > Quick top-post just to indicate that I just did gcc 4.2.1 based cross-builds > for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc and TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 and they completed. They > had analogous warnings to what clang (powerpc) and powerpc64-gcc (powerpc64) &

Re: svn commit: r302601 - in head/sys: arm/include arm64/include [__WCHAR_MAX definition mostly]

2016-07-11 Thread Mark Millard
ck with Bruce Evans. He has good coverage of the various standards to be covered (that may not all agree and how/what FreeBSD then picks). === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: svn commit: r302601 - in head/sys: arm/include arm64/include [clang 3.8.0: powerpc has odd mix of signed wchar_t and unsigned char]

2016-07-13 Thread Mark Millard
[The below does note that TARGET=powerpc has a mix of signed wchar_t and unsigned char types and most architectures have both being signed types.] On 2016-Jul-11, at 8:57 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 12.07.2016 5:44, Mark Millard wrote: >> My understanding of the criteria for __WCHA

Re: svn commit: r302601 - in head/sys: arm/include arm64/include [clang 3.8.0: powerpc int instead of 32-bit SYSVR4's long and 64-bit ELF V2 long]

2016-07-13 Thread Mark Millard
On 2016-Jul-13, at 6:00 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 13.07.2016 11:53, Mark Millard wrote: >> [The below does note that TARGET=powerpc has a mix of signed wchar_t and >> unsigned char types and most architectures have both being signed types.] > > POSIX says nothing a

Re: svn commit: r302601 - in head/sys: arm/include arm64/include [clang 3.8.0: powerpc int instead of 32-bit SYSVR4's long and 64-bit ELF V2 long]

2016-07-14 Thread Mark Millard
ariants (32-bit vs. 64-bit), causing lots of false-positive compiler notices. gcc had followed the ABI involved (long int) until the correction. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net On 2016-Jul-13, at 11:46 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2016-Jul-13, at 6:00 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote: > &

FYI: svn commit: r301453 - in head/sys: arm/arm arm64/arm64 dev/fdt dev/gpio dev/iicbus dev/ofw dev/pci dev/vnic kern mips/mips sys

2016-07-18 Thread Mark Millard
ebus.c > >head/sys/dev/gpio/ofw_gpiobus.c > >head/sys/dev/iicbus/ofw_iicbus.c > >head/sys/dev/ofw/ofw_bus_subr.c > >head/sys/dev/ofw/ofw_bus_subr.h > >head/sys/dev/ofw/ofwbus.c > >head/sys/dev/pci/pci_host_generic.c > > head/sys/dev/vn

11.0 -r303168 for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc: etc/mtree/BSD.lib32.dist usr/lib32/i18n/ usr/lib32/dtrace/ usr/lib32/ involved

2016-07-22 Thread Mark Millard
dling. There are other problems as well, such as exception handling. To actually use the buildworld result I'd use a kernel modified to have a so-called "red-zone" for signal delivery. clang can not yet build the kernel so that part would be gcc 4.2.1 based. This does not deal wit

BETA3 new message on rpi2 boot (just one boot?): dhclient[836]: send_packet: No buffer space available

2016-07-30 Thread Mark Millard
(autoselect) > status: no carrier > nd6 options=29 > add host 127.0.0.1: gateway lo0 fib 0: route already in table > add host ::1: gateway lo0 fib 0: route already in table > add net fe80::: gateway ::1 > add net ff02::: gateway ::1 > add net :::0.0.0.0:

FYI: amd64 FreeBSD 11.0-BETA3 running under VirtualBox on Mac OS X 10.11.6 : using qemu-system-sparc64 from emulators/qemu-devel in such a FreeBSD results in...

2016-08-02 Thread Mark Millard
WWW: http://wiki.qemu.org/Main_Page > Comment: QEMU CPU Emulator - development version > Options: > CDROM_DMA : on > CURL : on > DOCS : on > GNS3 : on > GNUTLS : on > GTK2 : on > JPEG : on > OPENGL : on > PCAP : on > PNG: on > SAMBA : off > SASL : on > STATIC_LINK: off > USBREDIR : off > X11: on > X86_TARGETS: off . . . === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: unionfs bugs, a partial patch and some comments [Was: Re: 1-BETA3 Panic: __lockmgr_args: downgrade a recursed lockmgr nfs @ /usr/local/share/deploy-tools/RELENG_11/src/sys/fs/unionfs/union_vnops.c

2016-08-08 Thread Mark Johnston
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:02:00AM +0200, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: > Bezüglich Rick Macklem's Nachricht vom 07.08.2016 23:34 (localtime): > > Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I had another crash which I'm quite sure was triggered by mount_unionfs: > > Just in case you are not alread

stable/11 -r304029: amd64-gcc says: sys/dev/hptmv/vdevice.h error: variably modified '_ArrayTables' at file scope

2016-08-13 Thread Mark Millard
TRINGS .endif # # # From based on clang (via system). . . # .if ${.MAKE.LEVEL} == 0 CC=/usr/bin/clang CXX=/usr/bin/clang++ CPP=/usr/bin/clang-cpp .export CC .export CXX .export CPP .endif # more ~/src.configs/make.conf CFLAGS.gcc+= -v === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___

stable/11 -r304029: an isolated "CAM status: CCB request completed with an error" (I've never had such before)

2016-08-14 Thread Mark Millard
[i:]" Revision: 304029 Last Changed Rev: 304029 # uname -apKU FreeBSD rpi2 11.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 11.0-PRERELEASE #4 r304029M: Sat Aug 13 01:10:34 PDT 2016 markmi@FreeBSDx64:/usr/obj/clang/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/RPI2-NODBG arm armv6 1100500 1100500 # svnlite info /usr/ports | grep &

Re: lots of security advisories rehashed

2016-08-15 Thread Mark Felder
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016, at 05:27, Bob Bishop wrote: > > Why is this hiding out on questions@ ? > I wanted to reach a broader audience. -- Mark Felder ports-secteam member f...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing l

Re: Problems with our libgcc_s.so in base [FYI: armv6 C++/g++6 example under stable/11 -r304029]

2016-08-21 Thread Mark Millard
-PRERELEASE #4 r304029M: Sat Aug 13 > 01:10:34 PDT 2016 > markmi@FreeBSDx64:/usr/obj/clang/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/RPI2-N > ODBG arm armv6 1100500 1100500 === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Benchmarks results for FreeBSD 11

2016-08-21 Thread Mark Linimon
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:57:24AM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > unless knowledgable people respond publicly and/or in the phoronix > forums [...] this interpretation of reality will be fixed in decision- > makers' minds and consequently the uptake (and support) of FreeBSD. IIRC this has been d

Re: Time to enable partial relro [a stable/11 -r304029 armv6 "PT2MAP abort" (copyout+0x2c4) panic possibly related to enabling RELRO?]

2016-08-27 Thread Mark Millard
make.conf > WANT_QT_VERBOSE_CONFIGURE=1 > # > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=perl5=5.22 > WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/portswork > WITH_DEBUG= > WITH_DEBUG_FILES= > MALLOC_PRODUCTION= If I remember right the above are accurate for the rpi2 as well. I'll note that arm-none-eabi-binutils

Re: Time to enable partial relro [a stable/11 -r304029 armv6 "PT2MAP abort" (copyout+0x2c4) panic possibly related to enabling RELRO?]

2016-08-27 Thread Mark Millard
Quick top post: retrying "portmaster -DKa" after rebooting did not repeat the panic. OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=RELRO likely has nothing to do with the unusual panic. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net On 2016-Aug-27, at 3:35 AM, Mark Millard wrote: [I've no solid evidence of wh

Re: Benchmarks results for Compilers on FreeBSD 11

2016-08-31 Thread Mark Linimon
I'll demur just a bit on your points. On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:51:02PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > "we need a compiler to build the system" (a prebuilt package does that > just fine), Well, yes, for a tier-1 machine; and one that is connected to the network. > I can't speak for the whole universe

Ephemeral /var/run and creating port-specific subdir at service startup time

2016-08-31 Thread Mark Martinec
in expecting that /var/run may be ephemeral and is such a setup (as is common in Linux) unsupported? Mark ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fr

Re: svn commit: r306207 - releng/11.0/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes

2016-09-22 Thread Mark Millard
uilding > on one system and installing on another will fail due > to not finding cc in the OBJDIR. > > An actual fix will be made on head separately. > > PR: 212877 > Relnotes: yes > Sponsored by: Dell EMC

11.0-RELEASE tier level for arm64/aaarch64 and the officially built arm/armv6 variants?

2016-09-23 Thread Mark Millard
note that, while there are no official builds for the Pine64 family (A64 based) that are under the Allwinner arm activity, the SOC's involved are Cortex-A53 64-bit arm based. They likely do not fit in the "standard conventions" or arm64/aarch64 would be where they would hav

Fwd: 11.0-RELEASE tier level for arm64/aaarch64 and the officially built arm/armv6 variants?

2016-09-23 Thread Mark Millard
andard conventions" or arm64/aarch64 would be where they would have been supported. Some rewording might be appropriate for the above quote as well.] === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebs

Re: 11.0-RELEASE tier level for arm64/aarch64 and the officially built arm/armv6 variants?

2016-09-24 Thread Mark Millard
e SOC's involved are Cortex-A53 64-bit arm based. They likely do not fit in the "standard conventions" or arm64/aarch64 would be where they would have been supported. Some rewording might be appropriate for the above quote as well.] === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net

Re: 11.0-RELEASE tier level for arm64/aaarch64 and the officially built arm/armv6 variants?

2016-09-24 Thread Mark Millard
On 2016-Sep-24, at 2:11 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >> [A resend since I forget to list free-arm in the To: the first time.] >> >> From https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/arm.html : >> >>> 32-bit ARM is offi

Just FYI: FreeBSD-11.0-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64.raw under qemu on odroid-c2 Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS

2016-09-25 Thread Mark Millard
64. I've not put much effort into figuring such out given the more basic problems above. (The environment the attempt was done from is dhcp based.) === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

devel/powerpc64-gcc cross-build of libc++ based stable/11 -r306344 buildworld failed: call to . . . lacks nop, can't restore toc; recompile with -fPIC

2016-09-26 Thread Mark Millard
more /etc/make.conf > WANT_QT_VERBOSE_CONFIGURE=1 > # > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=perl5=5.22 > WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/portswork > WITH_DEBUG= > WITH_DEBUG_FILES= > MALLOC_PRODUCTION= > # svnlite status /usr/src > M /usr/src/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/Selection

Re: devel/powerpc64-gcc cross-build of libc++ based stable/11 -r306344 buildworld failed: call to . . . lacks nop, can't restore toc; recompile with -fPIC

2016-09-26 Thread Mark Millard
Quick top post on avoiding the problem: Reverting devel/powerpc64-gcc from -r421598 to -r413189 appears to have avoided this problem. While buildworld is still building: the build is well past the failure point reported below. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net On 2016-Sep-26, at 4:48

Re: aibs(4) / atk0110 support for newer systems

2016-09-30 Thread Mark Dixon
Hi Andriy, I tried your patch on an Asus Z170-Deluxe on 11-RELEASEt and aibs did not seem to pick up anything before or after. Not 100% what sensors this board has. Regards, Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >