On 22/11/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:49:12AM +, Chris wrote:
> On a few occasions all different remote servers I have had nfs cause
> servers to stop responding so I stopped using it all the servers were
> either 6.0 release 6
On 23/11/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 05:25:21AM +, Chris wrote:
> On 22/11/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:49:12AM +, Chris wrote:
> >> On a few occasions all different remot
d-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
good observation all the servers I have had locking up on me with
nfs/sshfs all inicdently use sis/fxp/rl no coincidence the only 2
servers that dont use these lan cards which are using dc/re work fine
with nfs.
On 23/11/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 04:38:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >kris a development on this, someone else posted about a nfs problem
> >and reading his post some starkling
On 23/11/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 04:38:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >kris a development on this, someone else posted about a nfs problem
> >and reading his post some starkling
and ended up checking my loader.conf and tried setting a
value and leaving it as auto, both of these changes fixed the download
speed issue but setting to "0" introduces the problem.
Has anyone else noticed this?
Chris
___
freebsd-s
I use the athlon-xp switch on 3 boxes with no problems all of them running 5.3
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:00:04 +0100, Bartosz Fabianowski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I am still having the problems with instant reboots that I reported [1]
> a couple of weeks ago. I have a bit more info
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:12:33PM +, Chris wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > After reading the release notes and upgrading my server's I had set
> > the following in my /boot/loader.conf.
> >
> > kern.ipc.nmbclusters="0"
> >
> > This is sup
Hi, I have a dual athlon mp system running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2, I
have wondered if both cpu's should show in top.
Here is a snapshot of my top output.
last pid: 15520; load averages: 0.28, 0.09, 0.03up 7+23:21:08 23:05:33
153 processes: 2 running, 151 sleeping
CPU states: 0.2% user,
229M 25168K nanslp 0 1:10 0.00% 0.00% java
657 root80 2580K 1028K nanslp 1 0:57 0.00% 0.00% da-popb4sm
480 root 960 3160K 1548K select 0 0:55 0.00% 0.00% ntpd
439 root 960 7964K 6808K select 0 0:47 0.00% 0.00% dccifd
Chris
On Fri, 14 Jan
I have been compiling ports using -O2 since I started using FreeBSD
back in 2003 and only port that has had issues with this is lang/ezm3
in FreeBSD 5.2.1 it needed -O.
Chris
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:46:24 +0100, Matthias Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >
Yep its fixed now I know, I was saying its the only time I have ever
had a problem, the problem no longer exists now tho.
Chris
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:56:33 -0800 (PST), John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 18-Jan-2005 Chris wrote:
> > I have been compiling ports us
what does -fno-strict-alias do? I cannot find it in man gcc
Chris
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:54:05 +, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep its fixed now I know, I was saying its the only time I have ever
> had a problem, the problem no longer exists now tho.
>
> Chris
>
I apologise I have yet to test the patch, but will try and do so as
soon as possible by the end of the weekend.
Chris
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:52:19 -0500, Bosko Milekic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you please give an update?
>
> -Bosko
>
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at
acc
ept, logging limited to 50 packets/entry by default
ad0: 39083MB [79408/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
Only thing that concerns me with my config is I see no "SMP: AP CPU #2
Launched!" is this
anged in the next patch level back to 3.3.6.
Chris
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 02:48:01 -0800 (PST), Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There seems to be a bug with the gcc version of 5.3
> STABLE (gcc 3.4.2), when using:
>
> #define _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
> #de
newer version then
what is bundled in 5.3 and I will report back. I havent test ezbounce
with 3.3.6 yet.
Chris
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:06:26 +0100, Björn König <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris schrieb:
>
> >there is also a bug which prevents compiling of ezbounce and psybnc, I
>
I am talking about the psybnc source because its for users on the
server who cannot compile software from ports.
Chris
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:03:05 -0800 (PST), Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 20
Changing this so it affects 5-STABLE is suicide it will annoy a lot of
user's and draw people away from FreeBSD to other platforms, I dont
see any benefit from doing this the symlinks have caused me no ill
effect whatsoever
Chris
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 22:51:37 -0700, Scott Long <[EMAIL P
I mean them downloading from the psybnc website and installing from
that tarball, I guess an option I can provide is to compile from ports
and make some sort of script to install the binaries to the user's
dir.
Chris
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:10:53 +1300, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED
tests you want doing.
Chris
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:15:09 -0500, Bosko Milekic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you please give an update?
>
> -Bosko
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:43:10PM +, Chris wrote:
> > I apologise I have yet to test the patch, but wil
Have tested on 3 boxes.
5.3-STABLE compiled Jan 5th
--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
61 packets transmitted, 61 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.062/0.073/0.146/0.013 ms
5.3-STABLE amd64 build compiled Jan 29th
--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
60 packets tran
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:16:00 +
Subject: Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug
To: Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
0 is supposed to mean unlimited, whilst leaving it blank(commented
out) is auto. Or at le
works, I have worked out
when this happens doing a new command and then trying again makes it
work. Any idea what could cause this?
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 305232 Feb 3 19:43 /usr/bin/make
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
ing 5.x as CURRENT they wanted 5.3 to be a production release so
disabled some things such as the ULE scheduler to force it to be
stable and its turned out a bit messy. Has anyone else got comments
on my 4 main points?
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org ma
3 len 61086 > max 1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type fc52 flags 3 len 55028 > max 1514)
It is still online tho.
Chris
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:29:23 -0800, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:40:48PM -0200, T?rgan Flores de Siqueira wrote
I have noticed issues with HZ=1000 on a celeron 2ghz and a AMD64
3.2ghz, both caused problems with glftpd app and I had to recompile
kernel back to default HZ=100 to fix, I have also noticed HZ=1000 add
latency on my celeron box.
Chris
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:00:09 -0800, Kevin Oberman <[EM
I hope your issue is solved I get the same on a rl0 and have had no response.
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:00:34 -0500, Jonathan Pater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed 5.3-STABLE a couple weeks back onto what is to become an
> office mail server, and after cvsupping to RELENG_5, I began to noti
I made a post earlier in the month about my concerns with 5.3 and I
reffered to 2 of my servers having tcp lockups, but on the most
problematic service I made some changes to the kernel and so far it
has been running very good network wise.
9:26PM up 28 days, 1:01, 1 user, load averages: 0.16,
Hi I have noticed 2 issues the 2nd could be operator error from my side.
1 - When editing make.conf I enabled "NO_BIND_MTREE= true",
but this breaks mergemaster and stops it running during mergemaster
-iv.
2 - This issue I have no idea what the fault is yet since I have no
console access,
Processing"
As it says above mine is set to 1 the default, would setting it to 0
help with things like DDOS attacks because it is processing less and
what side affects if any could I expect from ignoring ip options?
thanks
Chris
___
freebsd-stable
On 07/12/06, Anish Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 07 December 2006 13:36, Chris wrote:
> On 23/11/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 04:38:48PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 14/12/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:28:48AM +, Chris wrote:
> It does make sense if thats the problem since the entire server even
> locally stops working properly, and it always follows a unexpected
> nfs/sshfs disconnection ie.
On 14/12/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:28:48AM +, Chris wrote:
> It does make sense if thats the problem since the entire server even
> locally stops working properly, and it always follows a unexpected
> nfs/sshfs disconnection ie.
On 18/12/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:39:13AM +, Chris wrote:
> On 14/12/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:28:48AM +, Chris wrote:
> >
> >> It does make sense if thats
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I can understand your argument there is little purpose to completely
rehaul something that just works and only needs security
On 19/12/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:20:21PM +, Chris wrote:
> On 18/12/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:39:13AM +, Chris wrote:
> >> On 14/12/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAI
possible to make it auto run debugger, then auto run backtrace
then dump the output to disk so people who have no local access can
get backtraces?
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
iced that cpu usage went through the roof and there was
dozens of clamd in sockstat. On a dual xeon it did cause some smtp
lag but on weaker specs it caused the smtp to completely backlog and
stopped emails arriving.
I downgraded back to 0.88.7 again and all is fine again.
Chris
___
roblem.
--
Renato Botelho
GnuPG Key: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~garga/pubkey.asc
Peterson's Admonition:
When you think you're going down for the third time --
just remember that you may have counted wrong.
so now the latest version of the port has same cpu utilisation
respecting PTHREAD_LIBS.
>
>It's fixed now on 0.90_3.
Any chance to update the port to use 0.90.1 ? It fixes a number of
bugs, one of which happens fairly often (bad directory perms after a db update)
---Mike
What configuration in exim is needed to make it
calSocket' and uncomment the
'TCPSocket' and 'TCPAddr' settings so it looks like this:
#LocalSocket /var/run/clamav/clamd
TCPSocket 3310
TCPAddr 127.0.0.1
-pcf
many thanks seems to be working
Chris
___
freeb
total)
0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k)
0/56/8704 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max)
0 requests for sfbufs denied
0 requests for sfbufs delayed
20233 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile
7740 calls to protocol drain rout
On 06/04/07, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, April 06, 2007 06:17:04 +0100 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am seeing the no buffer space error on a machine running 6.2 STABLE
> feb 24 code, the m
On 06/04/07, Marc G. Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, April 06, 2007 06:17:04 +0100 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am seeing the no buffer space error on a machine running 6.2 STABLE
> feb 24 code, the m
erver user not a fan of
linux so not been a troll this is a serious post.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
so on a seperate testing branch so it allows
security commits etc. to carry on as normal and then remerge again
after testing is complete. Or is this simply not possible to do?
Sysinstaller I do agree it does the job but thats it, its not good
enough for people not familiar with freebs
lf supported release, I also prefer slower major release cycles as
well but I keep been told no on that one :) eg. it would be nice if
7.0 was delayed a month or more to allow the full pf openbsd synch up
rather then leaving it because lack of time befor
removal I dont know but that is what
might be it, and I use some software which isnt yet to be compatible with
6.x. Hopefully all my problems will be resolved when 6.1 is released.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > for this board is available... (not fixing all), could this fix
> > anything in my case ? I think I'll give a try on of these days...
> >
>
> That I have no clue ;-)
>
>
> > Geoffroy
> >
> >
> > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> cheers
> mars
> ___
I noticed a few times now disabling acpi in 6.0 fixes some problems, but on
the same hardware acpi will work on 5.4 is this to do with i386 support been
removed or are there other acpi changes under the hood?
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 09/02/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 04:40:46AM +, Chris wrote:
> > On 07/02/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 05:17:45PM -0800, Jon Holstrom wrote:
>
Hello,
You should try Xinetd as it has more options to help with this. I beleive
you SSH problem is due to a DNS/RDNS problem.
Regards,
Chris
>> Just a thought, wouldn't this open a new possibility for denial of
>> service attacks?
>
> I doubt it. I'm guessing you&#x
ow if there have
been any
issues with the source that I should know about before I "take the plunge".
Thank you for all your time and consideration.
--Chris
This message was brought to you by
the H.R. Communications
Greetings,
Here's a dmesg (see attached).
Thanks.
--Chris
Quoting Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 05:14 PM 24/02/2006, Chris wrote:
Greetings,
I synced up both my source and ports trees 4 days ago and as I haven't
built a kernel for about 5mos. coupled with the secu
Greetings,
My mailer blew the last posting.
Here's another attempt at posting the dmesg...
Quoting Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 05:14 PM 24/02/2006, Chris wrote:
Greetings,
I synced up both my source and ports trees 4 days ago and as I haven't
built a kernel for abo
us also fails with the following error:
:61041): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_text_width: assertion `font != NULL' failed
this message is repeated many times over.
Any relation to the xfontsel errors?
Thank you for all your time and consideration.
--Chris
uname -a
FreeBSD mail.1command.com 5.5
s and ISP(s)
(synonymous?) anyway. So why deprive them for the sake of others? :)
None of this was stated out of anger or malice. I just felt the need to
skeak my 2¢ worth. :)
Best wishes.
--Chris
with kind regards
jonathan
--
p
the plunge".
Thank you very much for all your time and consideration.
--Chris
--
Microsoft:
Disc space -- the final frontier!
FreeBSD
n for your help.
--Chris
Quoting Bartosz Fabianowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
resulted in a quite broken (and *un*stable) 5.5-PRERELEASE
RELENG_5 is 5.x-STABLE *most* of the time. When a release is nearing,
the first few steps of preparation happen directly on the stable
branch, so it will
Hello and thank you for your response.
Quoting Robert Joosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Chris
I *thought* I was chasing 5-STABLE using the stable-src-supfile and
issuing the following:
cvsup -g -L 2 stable-src-supfile
with these settings in place:
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
*d
artosz
As suspected. Perfect. Just what I was hoping. Thank you *very* much
for all your time and attention.
Best wishes.
--Chris
--
Microsoft:
Disc space -- the final frontier!
FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE (SMP) MAIL04 Fri Feb 24 16
.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 09/03/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 05:43:10PM +0000, Chris wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I recently noticed after the libtool bump using libthr on 5.3 and 5.4
>
> What does libtool have to do with it?
>
> > release se
On 10/03/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 01:50:36AM +0000, Chris wrote:
> > On 09/03/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 05:43:10PM +, Chris wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > >
On 11/03/06, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:19:54AM +0000, Chris wrote:
> > I wasn't aware ports removed support right away tho so thank you for
> > clarifying that for me.
>
> There is not enough FTP space for packages correspo
and resolve
problems but diffilcult with no log entries.
Thanks
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Quoting Matt Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Will this also transfer the filesystem structure?
Indeed. The man pages for these commands will provide variations
of their usage. So as to obtain different results. Dependant upon your
needs.
--Chris
On 29/03/06, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>
> > "Conrad J. Sabatier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> so [kern.ipc.nmbclusters] has
Greetings,
I feel as Tarasov Alexey. This would be a terrible loss to anyone
who currently, or in the future; uses FreeBSD. I *dearly* hope that
you can reconcile this issue and not leave.
All the best to you.
Chris
Quoting Tarasov Alexey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Please, don't leav
s a dir traversal it works.
this happened in freebsd 5.x as well but I believe it doesnt occur in
freebsd 4.x.
It is a nuisance because if I supply user accounts for shells user's
will tend to upgrade src tarballs and the compile their own stuff and
will hit this problem.
I dont know if
Quoting jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Wed, 2006-Apr-05 11:24:29 -0400, jason wrote:
Something odd happened to my 5.4-RELEASE system a few weeks ago. My cron
jobs are running 6 times. Everything else looks ok but I'm getting six
copies of my rk sweep,
256 colour Bitmap images.
and size should be 320x200
Last time I used one anyway.
--Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
Quoting "[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Chris wrote:
Quoting "[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Daniel Anson wrote:
I would like to have a splash display during boot. I have edited the
loader.rc to include only include /boot/loader.4th and sta
Quoting "[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Chris wrote:
Quoting "[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Chris wrote:
Quoting "[LoN]Kamikaze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Daniel Anson wrote:
I would like to have a splash display during boot. I h
l your time and consideration.
--Chris
--
Microsoft:
Disc space -- the final frontier!
-
FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p12 (SMP - 900x2) Tue Mar 7 19
al* cheap stuff
and never had any trouble. Though it *sure* doesn't hurt to check the
hardware list. That is so kindly provided on the web page and with the
installation CD.
FreeBSD is great!
'nuff said.
--Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mai
gross
> POLA violation. Actually, "POLA" illustrates my next point... :)
>
> Have you ever Googled something? Saying "Googled" is easier than saying
> "searched Google for". Language (especially technical language) gets
> shor
How many mirrors does portsnap have, it seems to only have around 3 or
4 and they all located in the .us whilst cvs has dozens around the
world.
Is there a eu pool of mirrors available to use or if not is their a
way I can apply to host an eu mirror or even 2 eu mirrors.
Chris
On 18/04/06, Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> > How many mirrors does portsnap have, it seems to only have around 3 or
> > 4 and they all located in the .us whilst cvs has dozens around the
> > world.
>
> Two mirrors, actually: por
n many copies of the test (at least 10) under identical
conditions to account for possible variations. The ministat tool
(/usr/src/tools/tools/ministat) is good for performing statistically
meaningful comparisons of data sets when you have them.
Kris
Does 'makeoptions DEBUG=-g' add
se a new OS or pay someone to fix it). In the case of quotas,
dont use snapshots. In the case of the NVE, a $5 realtek (rl) will
work just fine.
---Mike
are snapshots a default setting?
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
eBSD that just works.
After my rant I will say 6.1 so far has proven to me a lot more stable
then 6.0 which shows the amount of hard work gone into it has made a
difference and I thank everyone involved for the work they do, I just
wonder how many share my views thats all. I am a hardcore
On 07/05/06, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris wrote:
> On 05/05/06, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Make Jakubik wrote:
>>
>> > FreeBSD users now demand stability and performance, as opposed to an
>> > influx of new be
o do the 5.4->6.0 upgrade).
--
Matthias Andree
agreed whilst 6.1 isnt bug free lets not forget its a massive
improvement over 6.0 in terms of stability, I still havent seen a
lockup/crash on any of my 6.1 servers and they are all prerelease.
It did shock me tho they didnt simply repacka
On 11/05/06, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:16:42PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> GNATS didnt reply so I will send the info about email address I used
> and see if I can find the pr number as well.
Any problems you have with GNATS not responding, please e
Any chance of repeating here please?
Chris
On 4/21/05, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 10:53:04AM +0400, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote:
> > Hi list
> >
> > I have 5.4-stable from 18 apr.
> > netstat -m prints some strange curr
h is
> running low on disk-space, larger disks are right next to my desk,
> just waiting :-)
>
> Are there any finer details related to the four-way or larger-bug?
>
> regards
> Claus
> ___
Hi I am abit confused here, have seen a post from someone usi
Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4
onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning
on upgrading a SMP box to 5.4 and ULE this month.
Have you guys tried this without SMP?
Chris
On 5/11/05, Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
Ok thanks I will stick to the old scheduler on my smp system then.
Chris
On 5/12/05, Steven Jurczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>
> >Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4
> >onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes
erstand that? Bill! BEE EYE ELL ELL!!!
_ ___ _
| _ \ |_ _| | | | | | | | |
| |_) | | | | | | | | | | |
| _ <| | | | | | | | | |
| |_) | _| |_ | | | | |_| |_|
|/ |_| |__| |__| (_) (_)
Dear Paul ...
--
Best regards,
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-s
I also have the errors showing up in my periodic logs but they dont
seem to cause me actual network drops.
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type e14c flags 3 len 1722 > max
1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 1 flags 3 len 36860 > max
1514)
Chris
On 5/23/05, Jack Raats &
I also have the errors showing up in my periodic logs but they dont
seem to cause me actual network drops.
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type e14c flags 3 len 1722 > max
1514)
rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 1 flags 3 len 36860 > max
1514)
Chris
On 5/23/05, Jack Raats &
e 65535
if you have network instability try disabling giant functions and
device polling as well, enable syncookies, drop syn+fin, drop all
uneeded traffic with ipfw, disable adaptive mutexes.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Its been mentioned before and most experience the same as you by
setting it to 16 a dramatic improvement in the sequential read, I
currently run all my 5.x servers like this with no issues as a result.
I am curious if the default will ever be changed.
Chris
On 22/07/05, Mark Kirkwood <[EM
a reduced kernel but it
swaps like mad when compiling. Kismet and deps took over 12 hours. Just
after boot and not doing anything it has about 2mb free and 17 processes
running.
Thanks for any suggestions
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.o
Chris wrote:
Hi
The installation notes for 4.11 say, referring to i386 platform
" ...after installation, FreeBSD itself can be run in 4-8MB of RAM
with a pared-down kernel"
The installation notes for 5.4 and 6 (the floppies README.TXT) say
"FreeBSD for the i386 requires ...at
Thanks for all replies and suggestions. sounds like I can give 6 a try.
I can move the hd to a bigger machine for installing and compiling.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
Chris wrote:
Thanks for all replies and suggestions. sounds like I can give 6 a try.
I can move the hd to a bigger machine for installing and compiling.
...except that pcic and card have been removed from -current :( so it's
back to 5.4R
and
scrolling.
Ah I've just checked in firefox and part of the handbook prob is that
the link is no longer on the front page. I would vote for documentation
back on the front page.
Chris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
168.1.0/24 to any
20,21,25,80,110,443,5190
${ipfw} add 610 allow tcp from any 20,21,25,80,110,443,5190 to
192.168.1.0/24
where a problem?
thanks!
Go back to the HAndbook and read it again. You'll see that you are NOT
making the proper references for LAN traffic and internet traffic.
Best re
101 - 200 of 1023 matches
Mail list logo
