On 01/03/07, Renato Botelho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:04:18PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
>
> >Hi All,
> >
> >On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:32:55AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >>On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Martin Blapp wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>Clamd is currently broken with libpthread for some threading-reason.
> >>>You definitly need to use libthr (which is still CPU hungry, but
> >>>works better).
> >>
> >>I don't think it is a problem with libpthread.
> >
> >FYI: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307#c8
>
> I have no idea what this bug report says. This link and
> any other link I can find to clamav bug reports is not
> working or down.
clamav's configure was wrong, using -lpthread -lc_r in freebsd, now it's
fixed on development version.
Anyway, I change it to ${PTHREAD_LIBS} on ports, to respect this var. Before
my last change, REINPLACE_CMD was changing openbsd entry, and it was causing
the problem.
--
Renato Botelho <garga @ FreeBSD.org>
<freebsd @ galle.com.br>
GnuPG Key: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~garga/pubkey.asc
Peterson's Admonition:
When you think you're going down for the third time --
just remember that you may have counted wrong.
so now the latest version of the port has same cpu utilisation as 0.88.7?
Chris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"