p; make install
but it does not seem to have any effect
any offers?
cheers
--
Bill
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ectly.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/troubleshoot.html#TOUCH-NOT-FOUND
Thanks Ruslan, that fixed it, I had forgotten we are on BST
--
Bill
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
ontact
me off list and I can provide you with a development system.
thx
--
Bill
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
No it isn't safe to delete these as many, many scripts depend on them.
Bill
--
INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820
Fax:
r most hardware and that significant performance improvements
can be made in most cases by raising it.
While it would be nice if FreeBSD shipped with a more performant default
setting, it would also be nice if mindless benchmark drones would quit
assuming that every system ships pre-configured to
In response to Robert Huff :
>
> Bill Moran writes:
>
> > It's common knowledge that the default value for vfs.read_max is
> > non- optimal for most hardware and that significant performance
> > improvements can be made in most cases by raising it.
>
>
lves Linux, but they have been
competent and provide excellent support.
Bill
--
INTERNET: b...@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820
Fax:(206) 232-
in with Mailman, and anything that exceeds the SA
score is forwarded to the moderator for approval. This is the largest
source of moderator requests.
Bill
--
INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013, Karl Denninger wrote:
>I read around the net that using racoon and the kernel-based IPSEC
>options do not work with Windows 7.
>
>Is there a configuration that does?
I don't know about IPsec, but OpenVPN works very nicely.
Bill
Bill
--
INTERNET: b
\ (oo)\___
> (__)\ )\/\
> ||w |
> || ||
I don't think there are any license issues distributing a FreeBSD
kernel with ZFS statically linked like there are with Linux. For a
long time it wasn't supported an
> Admins attentive to security issues will already be tracking CVEs for
> the software they use and mitigating or solving the vulnerability by all
> means available.
>
> By batching updates, FreeBSD is making administrative decisions for
> other people's systems. Some folks don't need to worry abo
> I’m not sure what you meant about Linux distros not categorizing fixes,
> though — with some notable exceptions, most of the big ones certainly tag
> security fixes >separately, which is what allows `unattended-upgrades` on
> Debian/Ubuntu based systems (and `yum-cron` on RHEL) to work so nice
ore.
So has this been changed, or is there a problem in the p6
implementation/installation? I suspect it has been changed but I
have not noticed it.
Thanks.
BIll
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
ht
After replacing Richard Tector with a small shell script on
Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 17:56 , the following appeared on stdout:
> Bill Vermillion wrote:
> >I have been setting the bpf parameter in the kernel configuration
> >file to 10 [I forget which program needed that]. Prior t
anic: page fault
I've read that bad SATA cables could cause this, the cables I'm using are brand new but are probably
pretty cheap.
Help freebsd-stable, you're my only hope! :)
-Bill
--
-=| Bill Swingle - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebs
on atapci1
-Bill
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Bill Swingle wrote:
I've read that bad SATA cables could cause this, the cables I'm using
are brand new but are probably pretty cheap.
Unlike they're both faulty too..
You need to post your dmesg otherwise we have n
st in case and tried again
and got the identical errors. I ensure that the times on my
machine were correct.
Where should I start to look for the problem - if you can tell from
this. If you need more info just let me know what you need.
Bill
building static magic library
ranlib
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 12:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
saw "Error reading FAT table? Try SKINNY table?" And promptly
said:
> Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:58:45 -0400
> From: Bill Vermillion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: buildworld errors on 6.2p6
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.or
freshly install from ports.
Where can I start looking to get this running?
--
Bill
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 22:46:06 +0100
Bill Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However neither amavis, clamav or postfix start automatically, they can all be
started manually.
you mean that postfix starts if you log in to the box and issue:
/usr/local/et
Doug Barton wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Bill Smith wrote:
This is a newly installed stable machine, cvsupped and rebuilt this
weekend.
I have installed postfix with amavisd-new and clamav.
They are all set for startup in /etc/rc.conf
For each of the scripts, what is the output of:
/usr/local
Doug Barton wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Bill Smith wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Bill Smith wrote:
This is a newly installed stable machine, cvsupped and rebuilt this
weekend.
I have installed postfix with amavisd-new and clamav.
They are all set for startup in /etc/rc.conf
Doug Barton wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Bill Smith wrote:
Thanks Doug, I ran mergemaster (again), I seemed to have missed out
FILESYSTEMS, my fault for not paying enough attention to detail and
being in a hurry, which I am not usually.
It is now fully functional.
Glad it worked out for
some reason this is one server I inadvertantly overlooked.
Normally the OS gets updated the day any security changes are made.
Thanks
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
t put me on the correct track.
Bill
>
> Bill Vermillion wrote:
> > I just updated a 4.11 machine to patch level 24. Somehow I had
> > overlooked that machine earlier as it's so stable and only
> > is handling web pages, secondary dns and secondary mail.
> >
ad design and could transfer data much faster.
If this task is not up to you perhaps you could post the
make/model number of the drives on both systems. Without knowing
the sub-system capability you could be misleading yourself
with other tests.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
oid using anything but a system's standard
file system for the root/boot file system(s), using the more
esoteric file systems for things mounted after boot. While it
may feel nice to have nifty stuff, it can cause far more problems
that it's worth.
Bill
--
INTERNET: b...@celestial
both ends. Make absolutely sure the Procurve is set
to autoneg.
Replace the cable. If the cable is marginal, autoneg will downgrade the
speed to ensure reliability. Use a cable that you know will produce
1000baseTX because you've tested it on other systems.
Try switching out the NIC. Man
leased with the results.
I was able to get bluetooth tethering to work with my Blackberry fairly
easily. I still need to confirm that WPA2 works when I get to the office on
Monday. If it does, I'm going to go through with the update.
-Bill
e to voice your opinion, I don't understand your purpose
in spamming three mailing lists with this demand. What problem are you
trying to solve?
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
t know off-hand how the kernel records it.
Bill LeFebvre
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
t is, then there's something weird about the way the
value is being tracked by the kernel.
Bill LeFebvre
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
?
Heh. I released 3.6 with new SunOS code that didn't adjust for number of
cpus, and someone flagged the behavior as a bug. So you're right: 3.6
doesn't do it this way. But 3.5 did, and it seems at least some people
prefer it that way.
Bill LeFebvre
__
ire picture is
taken into account?
Thanks for any insights.
--Bill
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:22:48 -0700, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:55:47PM +0200, Greg Byshenk wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:38:28PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
>> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 10:02:05AM -0700, Bill Blue wrote:
&
g
related to my specific configuration?
FreeBSD v2.netoldies.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Sep 15
15:14:07 PDT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/V2KERNEL i386
Thanks
--Bill
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/release.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is
intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this
message is not an intende
h I've never used or even heard of??? :)
I strongly recommend getting a copy of the book ``Unix Text
Processing'' by Dougherty and O'Reilly which is far and away the
best I've seen for using UNIX tools. I think it's out of print,
and hard copies are probably found at
ne is a Delta (Midiman) 410 with an ICE1712 chip, and the
other is a Turtle Beach TB400 (not a Santa Cruz) with Vortex AU8830A2 chip.
Both cards have analog and digital ins and outs.
Anyone with insight on any of this?
--Bill
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd
rom the system,
> getting FreeBSD installed + upgraded to 6.2, building a kernel that
> has PAE enabled and then putting the extra RAM back in.
>
> Any other administrators have tips/comments?
I have no idea if the problem is related to PAE, but have you tried
booting an amd64 kernel on
P4 systems have
64 bit support. Unless it's specifically an Itanium (in which case
an i386 kernel wouldn't even boot) it's amd64.
--
Bill Moran
Many miles away, something crawls through the slime at the bottom of a
dark, Scottish lake.
___
f
x27;t know why it made a difference from Linux, and
>nothing in the man page appears to mention why.
Traditionally one uses ``fgrep'' for that type of matching.
Bill
--
INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Systems, Inc.
UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:42:03 -0700, Josh Paetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 September 2006 11:55, Bill Blue wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is this driver known to be 100% working? I'm running stable 6.2 p6
>> right now and have this device driver
testing/etc
I can do, _please_ let me know. I might even be able to get remote
console access to this machine approved for a developer.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential in
In response to Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In my case, it's a bce driver that's doing it. I also have some em
> cards in this machine that I can test if the information will be
> helpful.
Note that I can _not_ reproduce the problem with an em interface (a
PCI NI
1:1:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error
(da0:umass-sim1:1:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition
(da0:umass-sim1:1:0:0): NOT READY asc:3a,0
(da0:umass-sim1:1:0:0): Medium not present
(da0:umass-sim1:1:0:0): Unretryable error
Opened disk da0 -> 6
Trying to moun
In response to Guy Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
> > shutdown screen.
> >
> > A shutdown -p does the same.
> >
> > Other ACPIish stuff seems to work as ad
In response to Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At 12:27 PM 10/4/2006, Bill Moran wrote:
> >In response to Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > In my case, it's a bce driver that's doing it. I also have some em
> > > cards in
In response to Guy Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Guy Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Bill Moran wrote:
> >>
> >>> A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
In response to Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:28:35PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> >
> > A reboot causes the OS to halt, but the hardware just sits there on the
> > shutdown screen.
> >
> > A shutdown -p does
t; Remote console access would be a help. I suspect there may be more
> than one problem here.
In progress ... I'll contact you privately when it's ready.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
IMPORTANT: This message c
:37:40 PDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/V2KERNEL i386
--Bill
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
he gateway/firewall/NAT box traps all outgoing port 80,
rerouting it through squid which allows caching and access
controls for the entire network.
Bill
--
INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Systems, Inc.
UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX:
In response to Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bruno Ducrot writes:
> | On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:07:12PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> | > In response to Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | > > Hi,
> | > >
> | > > On Wed,
In response to Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> John Baldwin writes:
> | On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran wrote:
> | > In response to Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | > > Bruno Ducrot writes:
> | > > | On Wed, Oct 04,
I've copied many of the people who I've been working with directly on
this issue.
Can anyone provide a status update on these problems? Discussion seems
to have stopped since Oct 5.
Any new patches to test?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative
more detail information about it or it is error
> happen to NIC?
It's unlikely that this has anything to do with FreeBSD. It's more
likely that a networking problem is causing packets to take multiple
routes back at times, thus arriving twice.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion
In response to Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 02:53:15PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > John Baldwin writes:
> > > | On Tuesday 10 October 2006 08:54, Bill Moran
the thread in hardware@ please, I've been unable to find it searching
the archives. I'm guessing "bce" is not part of the title?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
; network
> interface working fine (cf. thread on freebsd-hardware).
Are you saying that the version from that site makes your bce card
reliable? Doesn't seem to address the issues being worked on:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-October/029407.html
--
Bill M
ly 2-3 people, tell me that
> the changes in HEAD work for them. So far, no one has.
I'm working on that now. I wasn't aware that improvements had been
committed or I'd have started on it 2 days ago ...
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
_
In response to Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In response to Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Conrad Burger wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > It looks like there is a "new" version of the bce driver in HEAD.
> > > When w
AD* in the latest RELENG_6 didn't fix our
> problems.
>
> We could still trigger the Watchdog timeout when copying a local file to
> an NFS mounted filesystem (UDP mount, GigE speeds).
Same here, although it seemed to require a lot more effort to produce the
problem.
I see ther
In response to Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In response to Jason Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Scott Long wrote:
> > > Conrad Burger wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> It looks like there is a "
ths and generates hundreds of
thousands of interrupts per second. You'd be amazed at the sort of
things you can discover with it. The downside of course is that a
Smartbits with gigE ports isn't cheap, but I'd be surprised if Intel
didn't have one kicking around somewhere.
-Bi
> Bill Paul wrote:
> > [Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> >
> >>On 10/19/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:18:13PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
test system up and running with your driver code,
and it doesn't take that long to run. Of course, I'm biased since I've
run the tests many times, and have easy access to the hardware and
software.
-Bill
--
==
be one of the issues hitting us as well.
Switching from testing the descriptor completion bits to using the
consumer indexes should be pretty straightforward. It's worth a shot
at any rate.
-Bill
--
=
-Bill P
onnections.
I'm seeing similar improvement. I've been testing the new version since
I came in this morning (About 2.5 hours so far), with no failures.
This is the first version of the driver that has allowed me to actually
complete a buildworld over NFS.
I will continue testing and
tried running the make with
> an increased nice level, but that doesn't seem to change
> much. and looking through ports there only seems to be
> cpu monitoring tools, not suppression?
It's unlikely that there's anything you can do in software to fix this
problem. You need t
There are often discussions of
huge databases there:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/
--
Bill Moran
The presence of stale files in this directory can cause the
dreaded unpredictable results, and therefore it is highly
recommended that you delete them.
_
w I can get it to give more info or how to
> resolve this problem.
I'm no expert, but this is probably where you'll need to start:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-online-ddb.html
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
install CD that I'm using today
to install on several others. Haven't had to tweak anything at all
in the BIOS.
I missed the start of this thread. Did you give any more hardware
details?
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-
; I won't be trying another amd64 setup for at least a couple more
> years.
Are there open PRs on this? We've not had any problems. Although
our amd64 deployment is still young, we have several machines humming
away happily. Where did you have problems, specif
ee or not? I'm pretty early in the diagnosis on this,
but I'm looking for pointers to keep me from doing random upgrades or
other time-wasting activities.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
***
In response to "Jack Vogel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 11/13/06, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Just experienced an "interrupt storm" on an em device that disabled a
> > server until I could reboot it.
> >
> > My ini
ulticast filter programming.
IPv6 is all about the multicasting (neighbord discovery depends on it
to work correctly). I can't explain why it's not working though.
I've tested the sample 8168B/8111B cards that RealTek sent me, and I
didn't have any multicast problems w
of your system?
> > Make sure to add -e option to tcpdump(1).
>
> It's more likely a problem with the multicast filter programming.
> IPv6 is all about the multicasting (neighbord discovery depends on it
> to work correctly). I can't explain why it's not working th
> * Bill Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It's more likely a problem with the multicast filter programming.
> > > IPv6 is all about the multicasting (neighbord discovery depends on it
> > > to work correctly). I can't explain why it's not
> Hello Bill,
>
> * Bill Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - Switching from and to promiscuous mode takes 7 seconds. All packets
> > > are dropped in the mean time.
> >
> > The SIOCSIFFLAGS handler in re_ioctl() currently just takes a short
rs:
I would take some extra time to turn "think" into "know" before wasting
any time pissing around with kernels. The above error sounds like a
routing and/or port-blocked issue.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-s
Hi All,
Since my upgrade to 4.10 Stable in mid-Octobor I have been experiencing
some named cache
poisoning. This is remarkebly similar to problems that I had back around
September of 2003 that
were fixed then for the 4.9 version of FreeBSD. I guess the questions for
the group are:
1. Has any
should cause things to
panic, unless you did the upgrade process improperly.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ake any directory and perform
echo * and then do the same with ls -f
I first noticed this years ago when on an old SysV I had a
directory that took 5 minutes to display and the ls -f was quite
fast.
> End of freebsd-stable Digest, Vol 95, Issue 8
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
_
Any progress with a release of 3DM2 that will work under FreeBSD 5.3 on
AMD64?
Thanks, Bill
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ng 1955 Blades and would
> very much like to install FreeBSD on them :)
Support for them is in CURRENT and 6.2, although the comment saying
that they're _not_ supported is still there as well ;)
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
gt; >
> > > > Any help would be much appreciated.
> > >
> > > Any development here? We have just started purchasing 1955 Blades and
> > > would
> > > very much like to install FreeBSD on them :)
> >
> > Support for them is in CURRENT and
FCed
back in to 6.
Keep in mind also that the holidays tend to slow things down, it might
be early January before you get a lot of people looking at this issue
seriously.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
onsideration your existing IPFW rules,
as this will not work if a previous rule allows the connection.
> Also how do I block out IPs after a certain number of invalid login
> attempts to prevent brute forcing?
There are a number of ports that provide this functionality. I believe
the mo
e on amd64.
There is something about these "please continue to support 4.x"
discussions that confuses me.
The general argument has been that 4.11 support should continue because
6.2 is not at release status yet.
Are the people making this argument unaware that 6.1 and 5.5 have been
at
In response to "Michael R. Wayne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Private reply. Not interested in trolling or becoming a troll...
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 09:58:11AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> >
> > Are the people making this argument unaware that 6.1 and 5.
t the impression that this whole EOL issue with
4.x is partly a result of not reminding people when the EOL date for 4.x
is every 5 minutes. The result is that it's just hitting home for a lot
of people now that it's the 11th hour.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
___
In response to "Adrian Chadd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 22/12/06, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I could be wrong, but I get the impression that this whole EOL issue with
> > 4.x is partly a result of not reminding people when the EOL date for
se of NeXTStep. It was
pretty stable, considerning the last release before 1.0
was 0.99. Jobs got a lot of press on that one :-)
> -pete.
Bill
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
of removing the skip and/or scrub
directives to pf?
3) Are you even using pf? The PR involved is related to pf, and it
appears as if the problem was related to an incorrect pf configuration,
and _not_ a bug in FreeBSD.
Someone should follow up on that PR and see if the OP ever fixed the
pr
th diffs at every upgrade? Not the approach I
would take. And please don't top-post.
I don't remember the details of how heartbeat works, but you should be able
to set the required variables and export them into the environment prior
to calling the mysql-server script. If not, just creat
gt;
> Thx!
>
> Richard
>
> ___
You can modify the keyword section of the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server(.sh)
and add "nostart" This
allows you to start it manually with /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server start,
but
ing a hard time figuring
out what problem could possibly be fixed by setting the RX interrupt
delay timer to a non-zero value (especially since elsewhere in the em(4)
source it says that doing so is a Bad Thing (tm)).
-Bill
> Jack
>
> PS This is based on 6.2, but is needed for CURRENT a
In response to Pieter Migo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> please unsubscribe
> ___
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PR
t with the release on Jan 19.
Do I need to send this to anyone to look at. Any hints? Or should
I just 'fugidaboudid'
Bill
- Forwarded message from Charlie Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> From: Charlie Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Da
1 - 100 of 233 matches
Mail list logo
