de in 7-STABLE. It's been axed out for 8-CURRENT
short before 8.0-R. So you may want to run 7.x if you depend on ISDN
(AFAIK it's still in a working condition for 7).
Cheers,
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
me -a`:
FreeBSD cesar.sz.vwsoft.com 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #38: Sun Aug
17 15:12:10 CEST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CESAR i386
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
very recent 7-STABLE box:
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD cesar.sz.vwsoft.com 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #46: Tue
> Sep 30 23:33:36 CEST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CESAR
> i386
Do you mind to show me your rules? What does ``pfctl -gnf
/path/to/your/rules'
oking into my crystal ball... ;)
You seem to have a rule like:
pass ... on tun0 from any to tun0 ...
If you change that into:
pass ... on tun0 from any to (tun0) ...
pf will happily parse your rules and activate your firewall even while
tun0 does not already have an IP address. You may also t
On 10/04/08 01:22, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 00:40:45 +0200
> Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You seem to have a rule like:
>>
>> pass ... on tun0 from any to tun0 ...
>>
>> If you change that into:
>>
>> pass ... on tun0 f
menu for longer than ~10 seconds.
This doesn't happen if USB is built into kernel.
That sound strange. I have no idea why that might work (or I'm
totally wrong with my handover theory).
Weird...
Yes, sounds like or it's probably easily explainable ;)
Volker
___
#x27;s keyboard problem.
But when combining that with your findings, it may still be a thing to
check for... ;)
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
some code
being confused?).
What's going on there?
Thx!
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
eeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE #8: Sun Feb 17 19:13:08 CET 2008
The network the dhcp client was requesting (192.168.178.20) is not mine,
dhcpd rejected that address and offered another one. But why does
FreeBSD complain about the bad hardware address?
Any explanations?
V
t device 0.0 on pci5
> em0: Using MSI interrupt
> em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:64:d9:45
> em0: [FILTER]
>
> ifconfig doesn't show anything other than em0 and lo0
>
> Where should I start debugging this ?
>
> John
John,
I'm not aware whether or not y
n by a dump
(either minidump or the classical one). When the system boots up again,
it will check $dumpdev for a dump and save it to $savecore before geli
swap is brought up again.
Or in short: geli backed swap should not do you any harm.
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 04/03/08 16:22, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:51:52 +0200
> Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> while the system is experiencing a panic, it does not have any knowledge
>> about filesystems and also does not know about the GELI swap space anymo
090307 APIC1050>
> acpi0: reservation of fee0, 1000 (3) failed
> acpi0: reservation of ffb8, 8 (3) failed
> acpi0: reservation of fff0, 10 (3) failed
> acpi0: reservation of 0, a (3) failed
> acpi0: reservation of 10, 1df0 (3) failed
> ACPI HPET ta
another problem that causes a reboot on my 2GB machine. We are
> using a image for the LiveCD which is 64MB great. If i change back mfs_root
> size to 63MB all works well, but all above 64MB causes a reboot.
> Is there any limitation?
>
> Could someone help me out of this proble
he
boot chain), I'll check boot logic in the source code and may check for
your issue, too, at that time, so it's just one effort. But please stay
patient for some days, as I'm currently too busy.
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
#x27;ve done something really, really bad while
organizing your disk / filesystem layout. If I'm not mistaken with that
assumption, I don't see much hope to get the system up by a remote
console only.
At least, you may try to see if you're able to mount root from
"ufs:adXs1a"
On 06/11/07 17:30, ExTaZyTi wrote:
> There are some problems, first DDoS (hardware DDoS) in the system.
'hardware DDoS'... funny thing!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
specially - any specific test procedures?
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
193.0.14.129; // K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
> };
> notify no;
> };
>
> prevents me from resolving hostnames in "my.domain". What I'm still wondering
> though, is this an oversight or by design? I can't imagine setups like mine
> are very rare. Doug?
>
Yes, if the servers of the root zone can't be resolved, all queries
will fail.
If you've got a file /etc/namedb/named.root set it like
file "/etc/namedb/named.root";
and change the zone type to "hint" and all should be well again.
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 07/17/07 09:45, Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 July 2007 09:39:59 Volker wrote:
>> The root zone MUST be of type hint. You do not want to be a slave of
>> the root... don't you? ;)
>
> Actually, I also thought that this is strange, but in a way, this
On 07/17/07 10:05, Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 July 2007 10:00:43 Volker wrote:
>> hmm... the root servers should not allow public AXFR. As I've verified
>> using:
>>
>
> Just like you did:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dig -t AXFR @k.root-se
On 07/17/07 11:06, Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 July 2007 10:52:43 Volker wrote:
>>
>> Relying on a zone transfer doesn't seem to be reliable to me as more
>> than half of the root servers doesn't reply to AXFR requests.
>
> I've heard
On 07/17/07 11:06, Heiko Wundram (Beenic) wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 July 2007 10:52:43 Volker wrote:
>>
>> Relying on a zone transfer doesn't seem to be reliable to me as more
>> than half of the root servers doesn't reply to AXFR requests.
>
> I've heard
On 07/17/07 13:45, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:47:50PM +0200, Volker wrote:
>> As I think having a default to hint root zone is better, I'll
>> file a PR about that.
>
> Which leads me to ask:
>
> Why hasn't anyone recommended using
Doug,
On 07/17/07 18:14, Doug Barton wrote:
> Volker,
>
> I'm sorry to say that you've provided a great deal of incorrect
> information in this thread.
sorry? really? I couldn't find one!
> Volker wrote:
>
>> Remember, AXFR requires a TCP transfer and no
On 07/31/07 17:25, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Friday 13 July 2007 20:08:59 Volker wrote:
>> On 07/11/07 20:42, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> This patch attempts to remove a gross hack with a slightly less
>>> gross hack in order to avoid clobbering data in signal info that
>
.
>>> I don't really think that analogy holds up, given that those who
>>> run public stratum-1 NTP servers specifically request that
>>> individual hosts not sync from them.
>> The analogy is more true than you believe. Someone told you on
>> this ver
time within
the last 6-8 weeks (never had freezes before on that machine running
6-STABLE).
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
7;s, I'm using a script which does 1) csup and 2)
integrate a bunch of patches into /usr/src.
HTH
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 12/23/-58 20:59, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Nate Lawson wrote:
>> Volker wrote:
>>> On 12/23/-58 20:59, Nate Lawson wrote:
>>>> I've committed the below patch and want to MFC it to 7.0. To do this, I
>>>> need people to test this quickly. It probably
01-19. Please review,
check and test if possible. Should work on 8-CURRENT, too.
If nobody complains until tuesday (2008-01-22), I'll file a PR for
that patch.
Volker
--- sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c.orig 2008-01-20 03:22:37.0
+0100
+++ sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c 2008-01-20 03:30:03
er
chipsets). I've just been unsure whether or not calling ata_ahci_init
is everything what is required for proper chip initialization or not
but from what I was reading out of the current code, other functions
don't do much more.
I may include other chipset changes (from your patch) and send a new
patch if my patch does not miss anything for proper operation. At
least the codes changes work here for me (or I haven't noticed
anything bad). @sos: can you comment on this?
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
rebuild pkgdb.db that
way and all is working again.
Greetings,
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ode WPA privacy MIXED deftxkey 2 TKIP 2:128-bit TKIP
3:128-bit
txpowmax 30 bmiss 7 protmode CTS burst bintval 100
I just get a 'no carrier' and so no client system is able to see the
AP. There's no configuration change just a recently csup'ed and
rebuild
On 2006-09-04 22:57, Sam Leffler wrote:
> Volker wrote:
>> ifconfig ath0 says:
>> ath0: flags=8843 mtu 2290
>> ether 00:09:5b:89:7d:1f
>> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect
>> status: no carrier
>> ssid vtec ch
now go on and rebuild kernel (already done) + world with
freshly csup'ed sources, reboot and test once more if gmirror
freezes again (will take an hour).
Running gmirror with four slices (gm0s1: ad4s1, ad6s1; gm0s2: ad4s2,
ad6s2 etc.).
Greetings,
Volker
`gmirror list':
> Geom name: gm0s1
On 2006-09-07 00:17, Volker wrote:
> ...
> The only way out of this machine freeze is to startup into su-mode,
> deactivate/remove some gmirror providers and run in degraded mode
> all time.
>
> The machine also does freeze in su-mode as soon as I'm manually
> trying t
On 2006-09-07 03:03, Michael Butler wrote:
> I'm backing out the attached change to see if it fixes it ..
>
> Michael
Michael,
have you had any success using your patch? I was just standing up
and couldn't test it.
Greetings,
Volker
t. If anything is critical to test, I've got another testing only
machine which I may deploy quickly.
I'm in the european time zone (Germany) so please expect a delay in
response.
Greetings,
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
y one if needed. I
guess I'll put that logic in an rc script but gmirror might avoid
doing concurrent re-syncs and instead using a queue like behavior.
Greetings,
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
polite.
And back to the issue: The gmirror bug has already been fixed and I
posted a note to the ML hours before the first "who the f... did
cause that bug" post. A short look into ML postings would have made
this thread needless.
If you blame developers, then please shut off your computer.
On 2006-09-11 01:33, 'Anubhav A.' wrote:
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Volker thusly...
>> we're talking about software. Have you ever seen a piece of software which
>> has
>> been really bug-free? Not the hello-world, I'm talking
>
ll probably being
detected there. At a time before RELEASE date the -STABLE tree is
being frozen (no new features are allowed to be merged into -STABLE)
and after a testing phase (BETA / PRE-RELEASE) the code will be
released.
Greetings,
Volker
___
fre
(like ACPI
tables) please advise.
Greetings,
Volker
Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights
reserved.
FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #11: Fri Sep 22 01:31:31 CEST 20
;ve seen DOWN and UP messages
(mostly while rebuilding kernel + world + ports) on the console all
the time (but did not care about).
The machine in question is an Athlon XP-64 Socket 939, Asus A8N-VM
CSM. The USB ethernet NIC is a low budget ADMtek device. My
observations are probably not related
On 2006-09-27 23:29, Scott Long wrote:
> Volker wrote:
[...]
>> Strange... I've seen exactly that on a (recent) RELENG_6 box but
>> using a dirty old USB 1.1 NIC (aue). I've seen DOWN and UP messages
>> (mostly while rebuilding kernel + world + ports) on the conso
of natds' -same_ports option?
Function ParseOption doesn't show any processing of this parameter.
From my experience with natd under 5.3 I would say, natd isn't working
as expected for the source port numbering.
Thanks,
Volker
--
GPG/PGP fingerp
Hi Niels!
If that's not working (I don't know anything about ICH5) you may use
atacontrol to create a RAID1.
I've set this up on two Dell PE 750 machines with each having two 80 GB
SATA disks and it's working perfect.
Greetings,
Volker
Hi,
I want to use the RAID1 on
n to racoon2
and need to re-check every IPSec related setup.
Thanks,
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
that what makes me saying it's not perfect) pf load
script /etc/rc.d/pf is being run but aborts loading pf rules in
first place and later (when rc is working though
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/) pf rules are loaded by your custom script.
HTH,
Volker
___
freeb
On 01/28/07 16:40, Alexey Karagodov wrote:
> 2007/1/28, Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
> I've played with that problems a few times. It's not a perfect
> solution, but you may create your own pf loading script and place it
> in
On 02/19/07 22:25, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 10:09:50PM +0100, Volker wrote:
>> On 02/19/07 20:51, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:40:37PM +0100, Volker wrote:
>>>> I suspect this to be a slow /dev/random.
>>> T
ccelerator card help here to get FreeBSD produce garbage faster?
As there is medical data on all media I really need garbage
(/dev/zero wouldn't be enough for data security as this might get
recovered).
Thx,
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@free
On 02/19/07 20:51, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:40:37PM +0100, Volker wrote:
>> The tape sits there since 48 hours writing a block of data every
>> other minute and still didn't fill up the tape completely. The
>> system this is running on is a P-4 3
estion now: Why didn't I get anything useful from the
savecore dumps?
I'll now prepare for a fresh kernel build, install and try to rerun
mdsnd to get a proper dump.
Greetings,
Volker
PS: I didn't include dmesg + config as I hate those lengthy postings
to the list. If a kernel hacker wan
my system. Please forgive me if that hint has already been posted.
HTH,
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ith a BSD style license... ;)
Just dreaming?
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
terest in a project like that. 10k page hits per day is not that bad!
Greetings,
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
The filesystems are working well so I think the values shown are not
used by the kernel when mounting filesystems.
What's wrong with gmirror or bsdlabel?
# uname -a
FreeBSD bellona.sz.vwsoft.com 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #16: Tue
Mar 20 20:10:33 CET 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/s
Michel,
On 12/23/-58 20:59, Michel Talon wrote:
> Volker said:
>
>> As I've done this procedure twice yesterday and once more today,
>> I've double and triple checked everything but I'm running into one
>> single problem:
>>
>> partition c exte
it until its state is COMPLETE before
doing anything else.
BTW, do you really want to use a dangerously dedicated disk (by
using gm0X) without any slices?
HTH,
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
e to switch to other OS only because of this.
No need to switch! :)
You may find tons of infos using google or in the ML archives [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also pf@ or isp@ would be the appropriate list for questions like that.
HTH,
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@
On 04/18/07 14:14, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 18/04/07, Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > but with that configuration, still the proxy ip address that visible
>> > when my client using the proxy.
>>
>> Don't understand that sentence. What addr
dmesg, the backtrace is taken from kgdb as it
also contains source code line numbers).
Machine is 6-STABLE, csup'ed and compiled 20 days ago.
Thx!
Volker
Following: panic message, backtrace, uname, dmesg
kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
On 05/18/07 16:14, Max Laier wrote:
> On Friday 18 May 2007 13:10, Volker wrote:
>> I'm wondering if any of the hackers is able to take a look at this panic?
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/106400
>
> I will try to finally get this into comittab
roblem but why does it occur that
less and only in the morning? My next thought is a DoS attack
(CVE-2007-0244?) but can that lead into a machine freeze?
Is anybody else seeing freezes these days?
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 #0: Sun Feb 11 22:35:18 CET 2007 i3
On 05/22/07 17:18, Ivan Voras wrote:
Volker wrote:
My first thought is a hardware problem but why does it occur that less
and only in the morning? My next thought is a DoS attack
(CVE-2007-0244?) but can that lead into a machine freeze?
When in the morning? If it's around 3-4 am, that&#
On 05/22/07 18:24, Roger Miranda wrote:
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 08:15, Volker wrote:
Hi!
Starting yesterday I'm experiencing machine freezes on a 6.2-R
system (remote to me). The strange thing: It occurs twice a day, in
the morning hours (both freezes are within 1-2 hours) and for the
re
ed).
The portupgrade commands mentioned above might just be half of the
work as other ports might need an upgrade, too. I did the same some
weeks ago but can't remember if there was any extra work needed.
HTH
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.
On 05/23/07 09:17, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Roger Miranda wrote:
> Volker wrote:
> > [...]
> > I've attached the latest dmesg, can you see any similarities (as it
> > still might be a hardware issue)?
> [...]
> Our current version is: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE Fre
talking to myself... ;)
On 2007-05-23 10:27, Volker wrote:
> Currently I'm watching this machine over the distance and waiting for the
> freeze...
...and the machine freeze came this afternoon. I've had a good dump
of the network traffic and haven't seen any st
Kris, Roger & all,
On 05/23/07 23:58, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:31:32PM +0100, Volker wrote:
talking to myself... ;)
On 2007-05-23 10:27, Volker wrote:
Unfortunately three hours later, the machine died completely. It has
been a hardware failure which came quietly.
S
ay 25
12:34:43 CEST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GwMbg.debug i386
I'll keep watching this machine now it has debug functionality in
kernel.
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
On 05/25/07 15:01, Roger Miranda - Digital Relay Inc. wrote:
...
Volker & Kris,
Sorry for kind of hi-jacking your thread. Just hopefully we all can work
together to fix this issue (if there is one).
For me, that's ok as it may (or may not) be a similar problem.
Out machine did g
On 05/25/07 13:45, Volker wrote:
Using a debug kernel, the machine came up quickly with this LOR after
the reboot:
lock order reversal:
1st 0xc077078c tcp (tcp) @ /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:625
2nd 0xc4f18180 pf task mtx (pf task mtx) @
/usr/src/sys/modules/pf/../../contrib/pf/net
job). That would keep the trouble from new users
and also from some mailing lists.
I know there's a release cycle for 7-CURRENT planned next June but
IMHO it can be delayed for some weeks.
What does the core and releng team think? It might do good.
Just
>
> The way I see it (and this is just my personal opinion, not an official
> statement from re@), doing a point release now would be a distraction
> from our next scheduled release, which is 7.0.
Bruce,
is there any ETA for 7-STABLE?
Thx
Volker
_
ut the dmesg messages:
pccard0: Allocation failed for cfe 7
sio4: unable to activate interrupt in fast mode - using normal mode
As always, thanks a lot for your help!
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
On 2006-03-01 17:35, Holger Kipp wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 04:19:37PM +0100, Volker wrote:
>> Dear list members,
>>
>> I'm trying to get a 3g / UMTS connection to work on my RELENG_6
>> (i386, AMD Sempron) machine. I've installed a Novatel Merlin U630
and the
conclusion was faulty hardware. Are there any signs for geom or
driver problems?
`uname -a':
FreeBSD GwOsl 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Wed
Nov 30 02:41:47 UTC 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GwOsl i386
Greetings,
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ake less time.
I've had to setup a handful of fresh systems over the last months
and it was a pain to manually setup gmirror on each fresh system.
Greetings,
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
OM mirror Approach 2: Single Slice, Preferred, More Flexible'
Greetings,
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Patrick,
On 2006-03-07 14:22, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:56:57PM +0100, Volker wrote:
>> Patrick,
>>
>> On 2006-03-07 13:45, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
>> .
>>
>>> Are there instructions on how to do this
cable and they told me to change the disks jumper settings of the
failed drive to run on SATA150 (if it's a SATA300 disk).
Because my troubled box is remote, I've been unable to check those
both suggestions. Probably you may check that first if it solves
your problem.
Greetings,
V
iff_flags="-b" in
/etc/defaults/periodic.conf or ${filter} being changed to 'grep ^+' in
/etc/periodic/security/security.functions.
Bye,
Volker
--
GPG/PGP fingerprint:
FF93 13A1 2477 B631 E953 06DF 4C49 ADD9 E4BF 79B1
___
freebsd-stabl
ried to solve that
first. I might try to recreate that problem on a testing machine at the
weekend and give exact information.
Bye,
Volker
--
GPG/PGP fingerprint:
FF93 13A1 2477 B631 E953 06DF 4C49 ADD9 E4BF 79B1
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org maili
Hi Andrey,
uups... seems like you're right. My /stand/sysinstall is dated back to
the days where I've been running RELENG_4. So please ignore my first
posting... sorry!
Volker
On 2005-08-26 13:16, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Volker wrote:
> > When creating slices and lab
Quote from bsdnews.org:
> FreeBSD Core Team's Robert Watson says he has added lots of minor bugs in the
> POSIX FIFO code fifofs.
Great announcement... :)
--
GPG/PGP fingerprint:
FF93 13A1 2477 B631 E953 06DF 4C49 ADD9 E4BF 79B1
___
freebsd-stable@fre
try it on your own risk.
This looks interesting. I just did a portsnap fetch update
in my FreeBSD 8.1 box, but I don't find that snippet. Where
can I find those patches?
Volker
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
m the system.
Regards
Volker
<http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=ende&p=thMx..&search=implications>
Peter Wemm wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
As stated, FreeBSD's ATA command timeout is hard-set to 5 seconds, and
is not
> 2GB.
Regards
Volker
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Wed, 21 May 2008 21:08:25 +0200
> Von: Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: Instant reboot with FreeBSD 6.3 and > 2G
to date. i had to recreate
my raid configuration, though, which seemed not to harm my data.
(like this: atacontrol create RAID1 ad4 ad6)
is this the expected behaviour: doesn't recognise raids created under
5.2, but works fine with raids created under 5.3?
wondering,
Volker.
* Karl M. Joch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i had the verion 1 of the freenet6 client running for a long time. now,
> after upgrading to 2.1.1 on a 5.2.1 box the tspc client dumps core.
What does the coredump say?
Volker
--
http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/stolz/ *** PG
On 05/25/07 11:07, Volker wrote:
...
I'm using the following additional kernel options:
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
options KDB
options KDB_UNATTENDED
options KDB_TRACE
options DDB
options WITNESS
options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN
options INVAR
recommend pam_af for locking out brute-forcers:
http://mbsd.msk.ru/pam_af.html
For example we have:
9
Mon Nov 7 15:05:50 2005
locked
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sudo pam_af_tool statlist | grep locked | wc -l
363
Volker
--
http://www-i2.
ep SASL--
> I can not find it compiled with SASL.
Did you follow the instructions in /usr/ports/mail/sendmail/pkg-message and
invoke the "right" sendmail (ie. preferably with full path in case you're
unsure)?
Volker
--
http://www-i2.informat
* Graham North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1) Is the AMD Cool 'n quiet feature (PowerNow) feature supported while
> running i386 FBSD on this AMD64 processor? (Assuming MB support).
Maybe this will work: http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fvcool/
--
http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/stolz/ ***
ailable.
--
Abstrakte Syntaxträume.
Volker Stolz * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * PGP + S/MIME
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Solutions?
Thanks a lot in advance,
Volker Sturm
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
ot trust this board any longer.
Could any of the recent changes be responsible for this?
--
Wonderful \hbox (0.80312pt too nice) in paragraph at lines 16--18
Volker Stolz * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please use PGP or S/MIME for correspondence!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
