Ken Smith wrote:
> With the 7.0 release I tried giving just the URL
> of the primary site (ftp.freebsd.org) but that proved people don't just
> want easy - they're lazy. For the most part they just clicked on that
> and didn't look around for a mirror. Hence your observation about the
> differenc
Marko Lerota wrote:
> In http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html says
>
> Updating Existing Systems
>
> > An upgrade of any existing system to FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE constitutes
> > a major version upgrade, so no matter which method you use to update
> > an older system you should rein
Gavin Spomer wrote:
> I successfully did my first FreeBSD upgrade yesterday after looking at the
> manual, and cross referencing with Googling and getting help from our network
> engineer here at CWU. Before the upgrade, running df showed:
>
> Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed Avail Capacity Mo
Greg Black wrote:
> On 2008-06-10, Joe Kelsey wrote:
>
> > I have never managed to use burncd with any drive.
>
> Just for the record, I've been using burncd successfully with a variety
> of drives from the early days of FreeBSD through to at least 7.0-R, so I
> doubt if the above means very much
Randy Bush wrote:
> the undiscussed and unannounced change to the default dns config to
> cause local transfer of the root and arpa zone files has raised major
> discussing in the dns operational community. (see the mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
> did i miss the discussion here?
No. There
Doug Barton wrote:
> If there is a consensus based on solid technical reasons (not emotion
> or FUD) to back the root zone slaving change out,
If that's a shot at me, you're out of line. I specifically said I
didn't have an axe to grind with anyone, and I never piled on in
my comments.
The reaso
Doug Barton wrote:
> Skip Ford wrote:
> > The reason I provided *is* purely technical. The roots can decide
> > tomorrow to block AXFR requests from FreeBSD users who install
> > 6.3-RELEASE or 7.0-RELEASE. They may. They may not. But they
> > can.
>
> Her
Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > I don't think that "all" of the drama could have been avoided in any
> > case, there is too much emotion surrounding this issue.
>
> I'll concur with Doug on this. I've been discussing doing
> just this for the last 10+ years.
Why don't you update 2870 then
Mark Andrews wrote:
> > > > I don't think that "all" of the drama could have been avoided in any
> > > > case, there is too much emotion surrounding this issue.
> > >
> > > I'll concur with Doug on this. I've been discussing doing
> > > just this for the last 10+ years.
> >
> > Why don't you
Doug Barton wrote:
> In an effort to find some kind of balance (I won't even try to say
> "consensus") between those who hate the idea of slaving the root
> zones, those who like the idea but don't want it to be the default,
> and those who like the idea, I've made the following change:
>
> 1. Cha
Doug Barton wrote:
> Skip Ford wrote:
> > Just like I'd think everyone should sync with stratum-1 servers if
> > those operators supported everyone doing that.
>
> I've already pointed out that this is a silly analogy, as the two
> things have nothing
Robert Watson wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> >>This is my feeling also -- I would consider ABI breakage a show stopper
> >>for 6.x, but feel otherwise that the new code is much more mature and
> >>capable and would be quite beneficial to people building appliances and
Jon Holstrom wrote:
> I had 6.2 stable all setup &
> had gnome 2.18 all humming along 100%
> java & eclipse, tomcat, bah bah bah!
>
> updated src & rebuilt only to
> find 6.2 is gone & 6.3 prerelease!
>
> ( I think there should be a button
> we need to push to get
> software we DONT want! j/k)
>
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> The system updated a couple of hours ago (RELENG_7), the kernel config
> is GENERIC with "options LOCK_PROFILING", default /etc/make.conf, i386
> (I have this problem at current-amd64 as well):
> -
> bb% uname -a
> FreeBSD bb.ipt.ru 7.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA4 #1: Mon D
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 06:22:01 -0500 Skip Ford wrote:
> > Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > The system updated a couple of hours ago (RELENG_7), the kernel config
> > > is GENERIC with "options LOCK_PROFILING", default /etc/make.conf, i386
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700
> Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > It sounds to me like what you're seeing is portmaster asking whether
> > or not you want to delete the distfiles after an upgrade. The easiest
> > way to deal with that is to use '-aD' and then when it's done use
Doug Barton wrote:
> Skip Ford wrote:
> > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> >> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700
> >> Doug Barton wrote:
> >>
> >>> It sounds to me like what you're seeing is portmaster asking whether
> >>> or not you want t
Doug Barton wrote:
> Skip Ford wrote:
> > Doug Barton wrote:
> >> Second, without knowing what command line you used I couldn't tell you
> >> for sure what happened of course, but assuming you used some
> >> combination of '-af' what you saw was e
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:59:19 -0700
> > From: Doug Barton
> > Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
> >
> > Skip Ford wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, it wasn't immediately obvious to me that someone would ever want to
Doug Barton wrote:
> Skip Ford wrote:
>
> > So, basically, portmaster stopped and asked for input because it thought I
> > might've forgotten that I installed an +IGNOREME file 10 minutes prior.
> > I'd prefer to not have tools that try to "think" about
20 matches
Mail list logo
