Doug Barton wrote: > In an effort to find some kind of balance (I won't even try to say > "consensus") between those who hate the idea of slaving the root > zones, those who like the idea but don't want it to be the default, > and those who like the idea, I've made the following change: > > 1. Change the default behavior back to using a hint zone for the root. > 2. Leave the root slave zone config as a commented out example. > 3. Remove the B and F root servers from the example at the request of > their operators. > > I hope that we can now dial down the volume on the meta-issue of how > the change was done, and focus on the operational issues of whether > it's a good idea or not.
Thanks. I'm afraid the consensus has to come from the operators, not from FreeBSD folks. If the operators were required to support it, I think everyone should slave the roots, not just those running busy servers. Just like I'd think everyone should sync with stratum-1 servers if those operators supported everyone doing that. -- Skip _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
